While Mr. Fukuyama’s thesis was undeniably naive and an overly optimistic reading of tea leaves, I don’t see how it could possibly compare to the unbelievably dangerous, misguided and fraudulent hoax known as global warming. While Mr. Fukuyama’s analysis may have been subsequently vetoed by the unfolding of events, how can that compare to the massive scam being deliberately perpetrated on free societies by the likes of Al Gore and the global warming mob? One is incorrect wishful thinking. The other is a crime.