Obama’s punitive liberalism, or why treating success as a form of failure is wrong
I declare from this day forward that liberals are not allowed to talk about the poor unless they know somebody who is poor. And here’s what disqualifies someone from being poor.
If you own a computer with internet access, have a cellphone, have a television with cable, at least one car, or a microwave, you are not poor.
So in other words, if you just returned from the store in your car where you bought microwave popcorn for the movie on HBO you plan to watch right after you check your email, you are not poor.
Seriously. Liberals do not know any poor people. And for that reason I declare the subject off limits to them. In fact, I think there aught to be a law passed banning all left-wingers from advocating on behalf of the poor.
After 50 years of advocacy on the poors behalf the only thing they’ve accomplished is the destruction of inner cities, black families, and public education. So to hand over the responsibility of the plight of the poor isn’t just irresponsible on our part. It borders on cruel and down right evil.
Liberals are like little children who want a new puppy. And when they get it they grab it by the neck, squeeze it until it’s almost dead. Not until an adult intercedes to save the puppy does the poor animal have another chance at life.
That should be how we look at the way liberals will help the poor. Not until adults intercede will they really have a chance at a good life.




















