NY Times tries to torpedo anti-Obama book; succeeds in spreading its message
The article points out that the questions about Osama, I mean Obama are natural and legitimate irrespective of any book or critic with whatever background or agenda. And whatever its source, the light of truth shines to the benefit of all.
Now lets call a spade a spade. Butcrack Hussein is just not qualified to be POTUS, not even close. Even Juan McRino is a no-brainer preference. Only the most deluded and/or power-hungry partisan democrats and their bamboozled minions will not understand and accept this.
The rest of us (a significant majority I believe) may not vote enthusiastically for the republican in November but out of utmost necessity we will definitely vote NObama.
So face it all you leftocrat blogtards, your great black hope may have a lot of airheads swooning, but he is simply not electable in this country, not with his judgement (& lack thereof), his lies and pandering, the fact that he has no record of any achievement, and his racist/terrorist cronies, etc., etc. You would’ve been way better off with Hitlery as the nominee and Butcrack as the VP, primed for a POTUS run in 2016 by when he would at least have some experience to reference.
At least you can take heart that McRino may not turn a deaf ear toward the gullible warming gorons (if he still has a good ear at all that is
.




















