NY Times tries to torpedo anti-Obama book; succeeds in spreading its message
Here’s the new, more elevated improved standard of public debate that Obama and his change-bots bring us:
“Corsi’s a 9-11 Truther and all around nutjob.”
“Kimball is a four-eyed, bow-tied twat. His jealousy of Obama’s full head of hair is painfully obvious.”
“You wingnuts are a freaking joke. Why don’t you take the tinfoil off of your heads and come out into the real world. I promise. It’s really not that scary.”
“Today’s Hate Obama piece, from a square who wears bow ties. … Crap like this only increases my sympathy for Obama and makes me think that Mr. Kimball is nothing more than the average, petty blogtard.”
“What a pathetic bunch of losers you guys are.”
“.. you’re a xenophone, Kimball. Nice bow tie, dude – looks like you were cloned in a Republican factory. They actually pay you for this garbage?”
“Pathetic.”
“… you are just a sad little Republican conspiracy nut looking for something to make themselves feel smarter at the dinner table.”
“I don’t know enough about Roger Kimball and his supposed membership in NAMBLA but it should be investigated. His pouty lips, beady eyes and predilection for bow ties suggest a latent pedophilia that should make any conservative question his judgment. See how easy that is.”
“what gutless, cowardly little man Corsi (and his ilk) is.”
“… the scurrilous, scrofulous dregs of humanity masquerading as the pinnacle of Western Civilization that are the likes of Mr. Corsi and yourself. See you in hell, pal!”
“Jerome Corsi is to journalism as Cleopatra is to virginity on the Nile. The man is a sleazy hack. Naturally, this whimpering little simp Kimball –God, he’s the very embodiment of lily white pussy– embraces him. It’s hack-on-hack love.”
Yes. We. Can.
