I would regard any person who converted to Islam and and changed his name to “Abdullah” as guilty until proven innocent (as Orwell recommended with respect to saints).

This has little to do with you being on the right wing, but everything to do with a defect in your reasoning process. Its hard to believe but you’re a bigger douchebag than your silly photo would initially suggest. Yet, its true.

By the way, this is specious reasoning which immediately validates the very ruling you seek, with your feeble reasoning skills, to critique:

“People were not arrested on the Justice Department’s whim; in each instance the arrest had to be approved by a U.S. district judge.”

And, in this case, two federal judges–respectively appointed by the Bush and Reagan administrations–found that the lawsuit could proceed. If, it is a reflexive fact that a federal judge’s ruling renders something valid, then so it does here. Otherwise, the only possible explanation for the divergent opinion on your part–that when federal judges ok the arrests of people who you admittedly dislike, they are good, and when they clear the way for lawsuits by same they are bad–is that you’re a completely unreliable tempermental child in the body of a bow-tied homunculus. I leave it to your barely literate audience to come to the conclusion.