JPT @162

“You tried to claim in late March that there was a trend toward decreased approval for Obama. The basis of your claim was one data point – his approval rating in late March.”

Lie. Right off the bat. From the very start, I emphasized, repeatedly, that the trend was over a period of time. It’s an amazing lie, because anyone so inclined could check it so easily.

Tell, me, jackass, why I should read one more word?

I’ll scan to the end.

“I have a PhD in ‘hard’ sciences and perform far more complex math than this every day. I tried to dumb it down for you as much as possible.”

Another lie. Why do I know this? A PhD in ‘hard sciences’? You have a PhD in ‘hard sciences’? Tell us. What institution gave you your PhD in ‘hard sciences’. Let the terminology go for now. Let’s just make the observation that no one who achieved a PhD in any scientific discipline would say the idiotic things you said, nor would they be so reading challenged. And NO ONE with any familiarity with any of the the hard sciences would be unable to recognize a trend. And NO ONE with any familiarity with hard science would confuse the two point equation for a line with the definition of a trend and tell one and all that only two points are needed to establish a trend. It was one of the stupidest statements that anyone could have made, much less someone with math background and you were held up to well earned derision for making it. Sorry if that offended you. Don’t say stupid things in discussions that are out of your depth.

“It only means that over the past several months there has been no significant increase or decrease in Obama’s approval rating.”

More evidence of being both intellectually challenged and dishonest. As the discussion occurred several months ago, what happened over the intervening months is meaningless, and does not absolve you of being dead wrong at the time the discussion occurred using the data available at the time. You obviously have no idea how absurd that position is. And you would if you were what you claimed to be.

Give it up. You revealed yourself to be a jackass. Why keep adding to it. You can’t redeem yourself up by taking ownership of the positions you derided. No revisionism you attempt to make at this point can alter the record of what you, or I, said then.

So what do I put up? Continue to hammer away at the evidence of your moronic cognition ad infinitum? Pull direct quotes out of a thread from two months ago for everyone’s edification when I suspect that everyone with any grasp of logic reading you has already come to the conclusions about you that I did two months back?