I understand that to dwell on the legal underpinnings of her lawsuit gives undue credence to this whackjob, but what exactly is “discriminatory” in saying a specific professor sucks? Apparently, that is a widely-held view in her case.

And I wonder what sort of market is out there for her book – outside of the humanities departments of the Ivies, of course. Publishers will be lining up around the block for the chance to publish that paranoid drivel.