Get PJ Media on your Apple

Roger’s Rules

The ‘Obvious and Commonsense Conclusion’ about the IRS Scandal

July 14th, 2014 - 10:26 am

Actually, Fromkin writes “war” where I have substituted a contemporary reality.  But the same “obvious and commonsense conclusion” applies.

President Obama, to his shame, said that there wasn’t  “even a smidgeon of corrpution” at the IRS.  Quite right.  There is a boatload, and it stinks to heaven. Pace the David Brookses and Bob Godlattes of the world, talk of impeachment — beginning, perhaps, but only beginning, with John  Koskinen, the smarmy Democratic apparatchik who is head of the IRS — occupies a place not in “cloud-cuckoo land” but here in the terra firma of responsible political discourse.  Anyone who cares about the future of the country — which is not the same thing as the results of the next election — should remember and act on this truth early and often.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
We may not have a smoking gun but there certainly is enough hot brass laying on the ground to draw some conclusions.
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
It all leads right to Obama. Nothing else can explain it all.
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
FEC traitors "lose" their material evidence as well.

And whatever happened to the 1.1 million pages of donor information illegally given to the FBI?

This is weaponized agencies attacking and then destroying evidence of those attacks against the citizenry.

Frankly, those judges may be saving the necks of the treasonous. Because if there is no justice...something will shoot out the other end of that black hole. Those rulings are the event horizon.

If those judges let America pass the event horizon, nothing...certainly not light, will escape.

And the pressure building inside that void...will be immense.
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (29)
All Comments   (29)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
I think that ye forget whilst the fox tends the henhouse the hen tends to hide.
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
Let's have a contest to name Lois Lerner's prison nickname. I will start. Tax Tushy.
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
Dear Roger:

To demonstrate that I play fair and try to hold myself to a standard of English composition at least as high as that I expect of thinkers and writers as esteemed as you, allow me to point out an embarrassing mistake in my own note: where I write "I doubt that I am the only, let alone the first, reader to notice the error . . . ," I should have written "I doubt that I am the first, let alone the only, reader to notice the error . . . "

Logic and sense are cruel taskmasters.
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
Dear Roger:

Ouch.

That "it's" in the first sentence of your discussion can really turn off a reader.

It should, of course, be "its," the possessive fom of the pronoun "it."

I doubt that I am the only, let alone the first, reader to notice the error, as you have many sharp readers among your learned audience (I say this sincerely: these days irony and parody come so easily that I find I must declare, as though under oath, when I'm being serious).

Thank you, Roger, for defending the West even as it disintegrates and commits suicide.
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
I don't want the last word on this scandal to be that 5 years down the road that the culprit was found - coped a plea - and sent to jail - and when everyone heard the name they collectively went "Who?"

If that happens justice will have been officially buried on that day.

To the credit of our republican led house they have voted to diminish the budget of the IRS for tax enforcement. A small step to be sure but with such dimwits its a long learning curve.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CONGRESS_SPENDING?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-07-15-12-25-57

13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
In Watergate, Nixon resigned for being connected to a break-in to Democrat headquarters. But he didn't actually use the apparatus of the state to go after Democrats, only small-time hired hoodlums. Nixon did not directly order the break-in.

The IRS scandal is like this but where the state itself was used to target conservative citizens, not just the Republican party. This is much worse than Watergate.

The IRS issue isn't less serious than Watergate, it's much worse, much scarier, and marks a turning point for America.
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
Correct, but there are 3 other big differences that will make things much tougher:
1. Nixon kept the tapes, where it looks like Obamas minions have done a much better job of dewtroying all the evidence.
2. The MSM hated Nixon, and was eager to investigate him at any opportunity, while the MSM loves Obama, and will actively cover for him.
3. During Nixon there were some honest repubs on the commitee that actually wanted to find the truth. But now any dems on the committee may as well be Obama press agents.
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
Here's some suggestions on what to do...

Some good advice on proper tactics from Rick Wilson @ Ricochet:

"Congress should be devouring the bandwidth of the targeted agencies.  Flooding the zone with requests, constant depositions of senior leaders, a constant legal barrage of inquiry for every email, every piece of paper, everything, all the time.  Who cares if we use it? Torture them every minute of the day and force them to live in fear of contempt charges.  Make their execs lawyer up, and dig dig dig at every inconsistency.

Second, the power of the purse is entirely underutilized, and Congress as a rule has no creativity. Don’t cooperate? Zero out every executive bonus in the agency for a decade. Don’t cooperate? No more conferences, training seminars, trips. Don’t cooperate? No more drivers for senior execs. Don’t cooperate? Every construction project for every building your agency wants is zeroed. Don’t cooperate? We’re relocating 98% of your manpower to Omaha. Don’t cooperate? Zero out the public affairs budget. Don’t cooperate? Every program with ‘green’ ‘affirmative’ ‘equal opportunity’ ‘LGBT’ ‘diversity’ or ‘awareness’ is zeroed out.

Sure, it sounds petty, but the agency people we’re talking about are the most parochial, small-minded bureaucratic weasels, and their perks and powers are all they care about.  All it takes is a more bloody-minded approach."
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
Time to file a suit against the NSA to produce the "lost" documents. As Mr. Adams says in another article; "Time to go on the offensive". Big time; I would add. Sue every last one of them! Holder, Lerner, Koskinen, et al should be in jail for their crimes and maleficence. "Shock and Awe" should be the battle plan; and don't let up. Uncover the evidence through discovery and make them defend their actions in a public forum. I used to wonder how any nation could be taken over by tyrants; that is not the case any longer. It is happening before our very eyes.
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
I fear that these two judges are being ordered and directed to act 'fair and unpartial' simply to advance Dear Leader's "not a smidgen" obfuscation/misdirection/lie. With so many people involved in this criminal act of intimidation, I find it hard to believe there is not one single true Patriot somewhere within the confines of the FBI or CIA or NSA with access to some damning documents.....will they have the courage to come forward and be deposed in open court, or at least simply "leak" the documents to an intrepid reporter like Ms. Atkisson? Please pray for our country before violence erupts; it's a powder keg right now.

Remember BENGHAZI!
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
Where is the Democratic Party's Howard Baker, who asked "what did the President know, and when did he know it" which spelled the beginning of the end of the Nixon presidency.

IS there a Howard Baker in the current Democratic Party, or are the so much the party appratchik's that they don't give a sheet about the good of the country, or the Constitution, that they would continue to support a man/presidency that has gone far, far beyond what Nixon only HOPED to do...where is that man/woman? Where oh where, indeed...
13 weeks ago
13 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All