Get PJ Media on your Apple

Roger’s Rules

An ‘Outrageous Abuse of Executive Power’

March 10th, 2014 - 5:20 am

I do not know the exact composition of the rationale. But it is crystal clear that we are witnessing  arrant lawlessness and a silent collusion in lawlessness. I have had occasion to quote these lines from  A Man for All Seasons before in this space. Roper, the prospective son-in-law of Sir Thomas More,  urges him to arrest someone they suspect of being a spy. For what? More asks. He hasn’t broken any law. That doesn’t matter, says  Roper. He’s a danger to you. “What would you do,” asks More, “cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?” Says Roper: “I’d cut down every law in England to do that!” More replies: “And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws being all flat?”

It’s a good question, isn’t it?  When the leader of the free world makes his way back from the links, maybe someone will ask him about that.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
He is not changing the law...he is "fixing" the law. This is how one fixes things in Chicago. You delay implementation until after the election.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
Why does he break the law and how does he get away with it? 2 reasons:

1. Obama's and progressives' ends justify whatever means are necessary
2. A complete lack of an adversarial media function which is now essentially state-run propaganda
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
I think the basic reason people aren't standing up is fear. That is what has sustained the power of tyrants through history. And not enough people are standing up and explaining why all of our freedoms depend on sustaining the rule of law. Thank you for making a start.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (50)
All Comments   (50)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
From Brazil.
On the same subject, Andrew McCarthy points out (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/370909/obama-adds-irrationality-lawlessness-while-threatening-prosecution-andrew-c-mccarthy), a specific Atlas Shrugged-like govt provision. Has anyone re-read the door-stopper lately? I'd concede the awfulness of Ayn Rand's prose, but her "predictions" are coming to pass - to the letter.
49 weeks ago
49 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Why is that Obama blithely puts himself above the law..."?

Could it be that with his past membership among the "Honourables" in the Congress / Senate he took the measure of the members of that agency? THEIR respect for The Law?

Could it be that he KNOWS many members of the Congress and Judiciary are SELF - interested above all else?

The evidence of their concepts of duty, integrity and service to and for "the public" from the most powerful with their lifetime tenure is so much hogwash?

Fairy tales for children and "that vast Right Wing Conspiracy", their "astro-turf" or the current pet name "low information voters".

Look now at how many "representatives of the People" are anticipating their own futures IN Government. Rather than accepting their PRESENT DUTY to which their own sworn/affirmed oaths commit them : to Uphold and Defend the Constitution, aka the Supreme Law of the Land.

Could it be that so many members of Congress, and all Judiciary, are traiined as lawyers and kNOW as self interested of the Legal Profession just how to Game the Legal System?

For example how to AVOID their BOUNDEN DUTY to Uphold and Defend the Constitution. Dotted i's and crossed t's as hindrances.

THE oath binding them GUARDIANS of the Law, the Supreme Law of the Land.

With necessary and sufficient powers AND responsibilities as CO -Equal branches of the government to assure the LAWFUL administration of that government.

BUT what's an oath worth in today's "modern world"?

AND could it be that no matter how much Obama and the entire hierarchy of the "Democratic" and friends factions display AND HAVE displayed for some decades, their utter disrespect for TBHE LAW. and the People it protects from their plans, designs to Take over their individiual decisions in their private lives?

AS IN " NEVER, give a sucker an even break"?
50 weeks ago
50 weeks ago Link To Comment
I've written to both senators even though one is a democrat and is, in fact, the despicable lying scoundrel Harry Reid. I don't think there is much that we the people can do to stop the presidential grab for power; it will take the congress to awaken to the fact they have become powerless. Maybe after the mid term elections there will be a change of heart in congress.
50 weeks ago
50 weeks ago Link To Comment
and tell me why any reporter worth his salt, wouldn't be screaming that delaying the implementation is JUST KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD.

having a train wreck postponed for a while, doesn't stop the train wreck, it just delays it.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
this is what happens with a slobbering media that is supporting their unvetted, affirmative action, half white unpatriotic, irresponsible, chicago thug failure.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
I wrote to my senator (a Democrat) last summer. Within two weeks I received a notice of my businesses audit by the state department of labor. It was painful but since I am an honest person, there were no problems found. It's a bit chicken, but I'm not up for another soul-sucking experience like that.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
Fascist government response. Tell your children. Tell your neighbors. Make sure they remember. Or else we are all doomed.
50 weeks ago
50 weeks ago Link To Comment
The word is "arrant" lawlessness, not "errant."
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
Whatmeeworry: You're right, but there is a 3rd reason. He's delaying a very unpopular law. Of course its a abuse of power, but everybody is so relieved to get a reprieve that they're loath to complain about it.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
A very insightful remark. One that hides in plain sight. And look on the bright side. Many if not most Cons worried at the start that once established the ACA would never be repealed. The longer it gets not established the more likely it is to be repealed. Works for me.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
Where, I wonder, is the tar? Where are the feathers? Where are the pitchforks and the pullulating multitudes marching and chanting in the streets over this contemptuous exhibition of lawlessness?

I have a great deal of trouble picturing citizens demonstrating in large numbers that ObamaCare, which is clearly a major disaster, isn't being implemented on schedule. Seriously, it would be like a death row prisoner protesting that his execution has been delayed several months.

I realize that the bigger picture - Obama's ignoring the law of the land via his Executive Orders - would be the real cause of such a protest but how many citizens will respond positively if it looks like we're complaining that ObamaCare isn't being rolled out on the original schedule?
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
Where are the angry mobs like the one that famously cornered Rep. Dan Rostenkowski in his car? They just don't make a Chicago mob of gray-hairs anymore like they use'ta.
50 weeks ago
50 weeks ago Link To Comment
I think everyone who speaks to a liberal who thinks delaying the law is just fine how they would feel about delaying an environmental law, like something to stop pollution. Or, how they'll feel when the government is directed by the next President to stop implementing ACA. After all, it looks like it requires neither a repeal of the law nor an executive order to change it. The President can simply decide that the situation isn't right and stop it. Mind blown.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 3 Next View All