As everybody knows, the Warren Commission rewrote the laws of physics with its magical “single bullet” theory. This bullet did things never seen before or since. It changed directions and went through bones and marrow without leaving a dent on the casing or shell. It was also fired from an inferior gun with a bad sight by a lousy marksman with pin-point accuracy. It left major holes as entrance wounds and minor holes as exit wounds. This bullet was truly marvelous. But let no one think that the fabulous “single bullet” was unique. It was not. Its prototype, the “gas chambers” of Adolf Hitler, were even more fabulous. Those gas chambers were built underground at Auschwitz. This greatly facilitated the dispersal of the gas which is usually dealt with by building the gassing facility above ground. Then too, the “gas chambers” were not properly sealed or ventilated. They had no means of heating the gas to the necessary temperature for dispersal. And the room was not even big enough to hold the claimed number of victims. Hardly any trace of Zyklon B “Prussian Blue” residue can be found in the chambers where millions of Jews were supposedly killed. Why, it is enough to make JFK’s head explode a second time.

The Warren Commission managed to ignore all kinds of evidence from witnesses who saw shots coming from the grassy knoll, rather than the Texas Book Depository building. They overlooked evidence that Oswald was actually employed as an agent by the FBI. And they managed to rewrite witness statements to make the original statements mean what the Commission wanted them to say. They would not let Jack Ruby tell what he knew although Ruby badly wanted to talk. And, of course, they let the Dallas police Department do its own investigation of who let Ruby into the basement of the Dallas police headquarters to shoot Ruby. Naturally, the Dallas Police concluded that Ruby, a man with deep connections to hundreds of officers in the Department, got in all by himself.

It was all very innovative. Now, where did the Warren Commission learn these investigatory techniques? Why, at Nuremberg obviously! At Nuremberg hardly an original German document was introduced. All the documents were “certified copies of copies”. Genuine German documents of the Auschwitz camp were carted off by the Soviet Union and concealed from the tribunal. Thus, the Jews testifying to “gassings” at the tribunal did not have to explain the German records that showed only about 150,000 deaths of all causes at the camp (only a percentage of which were Jews).They were not confronted by the fact that the Zyklon B used at the camp was used to control typhus epidemics by killing typhus bearing lice or the fact that the crematory ovens were there to burn bodies that died of disease. Heinrich Himmler’s order that the “death rate in the camps was to be reduced at all costs” was, of course, not introduced. No one performed any forensic tests of the alleged “gas chambers”. (That was only done fifty years later.) Genuine German records showing that German policy was to deport the Jews to the occupied territories in the east were suppressed. So too, was Adolf Hitler’s dictum that he wanted “the Jewish question shelved until the end of the war”. The fact that the Communist governments being imposed on Eastern Europe after the war was 75% Jewish was not mentioned at Nuremberg. After all, was it conceivable that the Jews supposedly being exterminated were actually hiding out east of the Ural Mountains during the war? A Jewish newspaper in Sweden during the war claimed that 50-75% of Russia’s Communist Jews had been evacuated eastward before the Wehrmacht arrived. This newspaper was naturally not quoted by the prosecution at Nuremberg.

The Nuremberg Court, like the Warren Commission, arrived at the conclusions it wanted to reach. This process was aided and abetted by the fact that 2400 out of the 3000 total personnel behind the scenes at Nuremberg were Jews. Robert Jackson, Francis Biddle, Sir Hartley Shawcross and others were merely the front men for the real orchestrators of the kangaroo court. It was rather like the Warren Commission, where the presence of Allen Dulles was to help cover up the involvement of U.S. intelligence agencies in the president’s murder. Earl Warren, the man who was responsible for the round up and internment of Japanese-Americans in World War Two, was the Robert Jackson of the Warren Commission. The German defendants at Nuremberg were hung during the Jewish high holidays in October between the Day of Atonement and the Day of Final Judgment. They were ritually executed, just like Lee Harvey Oswald was ritually sacrificed to a pre-determined verdict and judgment.

The Kennedy assassination has generated an enormous literature disagreeing with the obviously doctored official conclusion. But the literature disproving the kangaroo court at Nuremberg is still very much underground. It is read privately by those deathly afraid of career destruction if they are found out. But the deniers of the mythical six million and the deniers of the mythical single bullet have something in common, nonetheless. Both are seekers after truth. And the truth, surprisingly enough, is the same in both cases. The real killers of John Kennedy were they who concocted the hoax of the “gas chambers”. And the motive, in both cases, was the same – to promote the interests of the emerging, and later extant, state of Israel. But that is another story for another essay.

Whenever the Jews are caught with their pants down on the facts, they resort to certain standard responses. Thus, whenever confronted with the Jewish involvement in Communism or the slave trade, they will assert that the facts are taken out of context, that only a small minority of Jews are involved in such activities, that the facts may be true of one specific instance but not all instances, that the behavior was the product of unique historical circumstances or of oppression, etc. In short, every possible excuse is trotted out of the closet. But never, ever, do Jews concede: “Yes, it’s true. We did it.” Jews have refined these techniques to a fine art. Jews who were Communists were non-Jewish Jews who repudiated their Jewishness; Zionists who invaded Palestine were somehow the victims of the Arabs they were dispossessing; Jews in Russia sex slaving women were victims of Czarist oppression; Jewish tax collectors gouging on commission were merely doing the king’s bidding, not robbing the citizen’s blind, on and on it goes.

The one constant in all the bullshit is that Jews are always innocent. Always – that is axiomatic. To reach any other conclusion is anti-Semitism. What anti-Semitism means is: Jews are always innocent regardless of the facts. Facts cannot be used to convict Jews of any collective offense. This is true because Jews say so. If you think otherwise you are an irrational bigot no matter what the evidence shows. Anti-Anti-Semitism is innocence by proclamation. Innocence by proclamation cannot be enforced by evidence; it can only be enforced by fear. The implied threat behind innocence by proclamation is: If you do not buy it, your career will be destroyed. You will become an unemployable social outcast. And that is why people tremble before the accusation of anti-Semitism. It is a threat – and one that will be enforced.

A professor Jeffrey Herf in Chicago promotes the line that any idea of Jewish ethnic solidarity across national lines is a myth. One wonders how professor Herf reconciles this thesis with certain well known facts. Let’s examine just one episode inconsistent with his thesis. Prior to the creation of the state of Israel American Zionists organized a vast arms smuggling operation on behalf of the Jewish underground in Palestine. This operation was transcontinental in scope, involving Jews of many different ideologies in many countries, united only by ethnicity and Zionism and manipulating governments all over the world. Let us examine how it was done.

The operation began with a meeting of prominent American Jews in New York City. The number was only about fifteen. One, however, was the extremely influential Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver, the chief advisor to Senator Robert A. Taft of Ohio. These men decided that the Jewish nation hood movement had to be supported by arms and munitions from America. They organized to that end. One of their stratagems was to buy large quantities of WW2 army surplus. Prominent Jews in the sheet metal business and related industries began acquiring machine guns and ammunition either by buying it or stealing it. The next problem was how to ship the material to Palestine in violation of American export laws. Various methods were employed. Many arms shipments were packed within carpet roles or fruit cases and shipped as “freight”. Unions, dock workers and public officials were corrupted, bought off or intimidated. Unconfirmed allegations have been made that J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI were co-opted into the operation. A particular problem was how to fly the supplies to Palestine. The Zionists conceived the idea of registering planes they had purchased in America in Panama to avoid American export restrictions.

This necessarily involved the cooperation of various South American governments. This was achieved by both economic and political contacts. Samuel Zemmaray, the chief share holder of the gigantic United Fruit Company, was very influential in this process. So was the dictator, Antonio Somoza of Nicaragua, who agreed to provide aircraft and bases for flying transports overseas. On the diplomatic front, South American politicians provided invaluable support to the Zionists. The president of the General Assembly of the United Nations, Aranha of Brazil, was a Zionist agent. When the United Nations were debating the partition of Palestine resolution of November 1947, it was president Aranha who delayed the final vote on the resolution several times so that the Zionists could coerce the necessary votes to obtain passage of the resolution. Garcia Granados, the president of Guatemala, provided similar services to the Zionists as documented in his book, “The Birth of Israel”.

The Zionists needed a base in Europe to transport the arms to Israel-in-the-making. Transatlantic flights to Palestine were simply too long to consider. They found their allies in the Communists of Czechoslovakia. With the approval of Joseph Stalin, the Czech Communists agreed to train Zionist pilots and provide them with high quality captured German Messerschmidts. The planes were then refueled in Communist Yugoslavia under the direction of a Mr. Joseph Korbel and then flown to Palestine to attack the Arabs. (Mr. Korbel later came to America and established an institute for international studies in Denver, Colorado where two future U.S. Secretaries of State, Condoleezza Rice and Madeline Korbel/Albright were trained. The Zionist international does get around.)

Back in America, the Zionists were extremely busy. Jews like Mickey Cohen, the L.A. Jewish mobster, Mr. Greenberg, the Las Vegas newspaper editor, Jewish casino owners, Lyndon Johnson and his friend Jim Novy and many, many others were funneling arms, munitions and money to the Jewish underground. Former camps for German prisoners of war, like the camp in Oswego New York were used as training grounds for Zionist troops to fight the Arabs. This amazing activity, which included the Jewish community in America, the corruption of the U.S. government, the recruitment of South American governments, the corruption of the United Nations, the assistance of the Soviet Communists and the help of Jews all over the world in pursuit of an ethnic agenda, leads to only one conclusion. Jews are indeed an international community, bound by ties of blood – and no denial by professor Jeffrey Herf shall alter that fact.

When Adolf Hitler was living in the Ratzner’s men’s hotel in Vienna he became very good friends with several of the Jewish residents there, particularly Joseph Neumann and Siegfried Lofner. The young Adolf not merely had many political conversations with these Jews, he personally profited from the associations. One of them was a coppersmith and Hitler used him to market his paintings. Hitler also spent many hours in conversation with Neumann, discussing such things as Herzl’s Zionism. On one occasion, Hitler objected to Kaiser Wilhelm’s removal of a statue that had been erected to the German-Jewish poet, Heinrich Heine. Although Hitler stressed that he did not share Heine’s politics, he thought it wrong not to honor the poetic achievements of a great German.

None of this jibes with the later fiction that Hitler was reflexively anti-Jewish. It is, of course, true that Hitler was a great admirer of Karl Lueger, the anti-Semitic mayor of Vienna. As in the case of Lueger, Lueger’s anti-Semitic bark was worse than his bite. The future Fuehrer also liked to attend performances of Shakespeare’s “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” by Max Reinhardt of whom Hitler was a great admirer. Hitler later marketed the vast majority of his paintings through the Viennese Jewish art dealer, Morgenthau, who sold Hitler’s paintings and sketches to mainly Jewish clients (as revealed by Morgenthau’s card index). Adolf Hitler thought very highly of his family’s Jewish physician, Eduoard Bloch, who treated, unsuccessfully, Hitler’s mother, Klara, for breast cancer. In fact, Hitler went on to say that Dr. Bloch was a “good Jew” and that if all Jews were like Dr. Bloch, there would be no “Jewish problem”. Bloch was given special protection by the Gestapo when the Anschluss took place in 1938 before he emigrated to New York, dying in 1945. Bloch’s comments on the young Hitler who accompanied his mother to Bloch’s office are interesting. Doctor Bloch stated that the young Hitler was extremely well behaved, polite and showed no signs of mental disturbance whatever. Moreover, when Hitler’s mother died, Bloch never saw a more distraught individual. While not condoning Hitler’s later policies, Eduoard Bloch had nothing but positive memories of Adolf Hitler as a youth.

If Hitler was not originally anti-Semitic, what happened to change his attitudes? As the historians Brigitte Haman and David Irving have demonstrated, Hitler’s attitude change was a direct response to the Jewish involvement in Communism and the post-war betrayal of Germany. The strikes at war’s end which crippled Germany were largely Jewish inspired, as even anti-Hitler writers acknowledge. Communism in the year 1919 in Germany was everywhere Jewish. The three Bavarian Communist upheavals were led by men like Kurt Eisner, Hugo Haas, Ernest Toller, Eugen Levine-Nissen and the revolutionary Jewess, Rosa Luxemberg. Other prominent Communist Jews of the day were Leo Jogisches, Paul Levi, Klara Zetkin and Ruth Fischer. The Brest-Litovsk treaty which ended Germany’s war with Russia was signed, on behalf of Bolshevik Russia, by Trotsky-Bronstein, Joffe and Abramovich. In nearby Hungary, the six month reign of Communist terror, March through August, was run by the Jew Bela Kun. 160 out of 200 of his top commissars were Jewish, including the notorious hangman, Tibor Tzamuelly.

This is what changed Adolf Hitler’s attitudes toward Jews. Hitler’s identification of Jews with Communism was not unique. Virtually everyone of his time made the same identification. The authoress, Cecille Tormay, who wrote the famous autobiographical account of the Hungarian revolution, “An Outlaw’s Diary”, said the same. So did Winston Churchill, in his famous newspaper article, “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”. The American State Department overflowed with reports in the early 1920’s on Jewish involvement in Communism. Despite Hitler’s undoubtedly correct view on the Jewish involvement in Communism, he continued to make distinctions between good Jews and bad Jews. When Hitler discovered that his chauffeur, Emil Maurice, may have been a Jew, he personally ordered Maurice converted into an “honorary Aryan”. The early National Socialist regulations made exceptions for Jews who had loyally fought for Germany in the First World War. When the Nuremberg race laws were passed in 1935, Hitler had a major problem because of the huge number of part Jews in the Wehrmacht. He converted over 50,000 of them into “honorary Aryans” to avoid their expulsion from the military. An excellent source on this is “Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers” by Bryan Rigg.

Hitler undoubtedly acted to purge Germany of Jewish influence. His closing down of Jewish businesses and banning of Jews from the professions is proof of this. Yet he continued to be remarkably lenient in many cases. Hitler personally sponsored the career of the part-Jewish soprano, Marguerite Slezak, at the Berlin State Opera. He also managed to overlook the marriages of a great many German artists to Jewish spouses. A classic case in point was the operetta composer, Franz Lehar, who married Lizzy Leon, the daughter of the Viennese Jewish librettist, Victor Leon. A not inconsiderable number of Nazi officials were also of part Jewish ancestry. Reinhard Heydrich, the head of the Czech protectorate, was actually or allegedly the son of a Jewish actor. In the military, part Jews like Lutwaffe General Helmut Wilberg, General Johannes Zukertort, Admiral Bernhard Rogge, Commander Paul Ascher of the battleship Bismarck and the famous General Manstein (Lowenstein) are choice examples of part Jews serving Germany’s National Socialist regime.

Adolf Hitler was not above making deals with those who later denounced him as the source of all evil. One of his first acts as Chancellor of Germany was to conclude the Havaara or Transfer Agreement with the Zionists. By the terms of this agreement approximately 40,000 of Germany’s Jews were sent to Palestine minus an exit tax. This facilitated the Nazi objective of ridding Germany of unwanted Jews while facilitating the Zionist objective of moving Jews to Palestine. Zionist leaders praised Hitler as the man who would preserve the “racial purity of both the Germans and the Jews. It was two Zionist rabbis, Leo Baeck and Joachim Prinz, who helped Hitler formulate his definition of a Jew in the Nuremberg laws. The Nazis founded special Zionist training camps for agricultural pursuits for Jews who wished to go to Palestine. The Nazi press consistently praised the achievements of the Zionists in Palestine and not so subtly suggested that German Jews should emigrate there. The Nazis prepared a special medallion commemorating Zionism and allowed the blue and white flag of Zionism to fly alongside the swastika. It was the only flag beside the swastika to legally fly in the Third Reich.

Today, all these verifiable facts about Adolf Hitler’s intimate relations with Jewry have gone down the historical memory hole. No one wishes to remember that it was the Central Emigration Office of the SS under Adolf Eichmann who loaded Jews onto the boats on the Danube as they sailed to British Mandatory Palestine. Nor does anyone wish to remember Werner Goldberg, the ideal Nazi soldier, who was the half Jewish son of a convert to Lutheranism. Even more forgetful was the little Jewish girl and her mother who used to visit Hitler at Berschtesgaden until 1938. And as for Hedy Lamar’s claim that she had a sexual tryst with Der Fuehrer at the insistence of her half Jewish husband and Nazi arms dealer, Fritz Mandel, the less said the better.

Adolf Hitler, for better or worse, was a thinking man’s anti-Semite. He opposed Jewish influence while acknowledging the good in individual Jews. Since these facts do not comport with the legend that he killed six million Jews in purported “gas chambers”, the facts have generally been buried. To read the suppressed facts is to realize, once again, that history is “a lie agreed upon”.

LOUIS FERDINAND LEPEN?

Louis Ferdinand Celine was the famous French writer of unabashed anti-Semitic beliefs. One of his more famous works was “Bagatelle for a Massacre”. Jean Marie LePen, the founder of the French National Front, is not dissimilar in his views. LePen once dismissed the Jewish Holocaust myth as a “detail” of the Second World War. LePen gave a private interview in 2002 with the Canadian journalist Eric Margolis in which he confessed to the ultimate in politically incorrect beliefs. Essentially, LePen said that the Jews who created Communism have now created racial equality as an alternative means toward world conquest. The idea, said LePen, is to mongrelize and destroy the white race by mixing it with inferior breeds.

He scathingly commented on the masses of Arabs living in France, denouncing them as a racial invasion and a breeding grounds of crime and poverty. As Margolis noted, LePen is an “equal opportunity anti-Semite. He hates Arabs and Jews equally.” LePen never expressed himself in public so blatantly, of course. That would have been suicidal. However, as Margolis correctly noted, it would be incorrect to describe LePen as a “Nazi”. More precisely, he is a product of the Catholic, anti-Masonic, anti-Jewish mentality of the 1930’s. In a sense, Jean Marie LePen might be considered a French Patrick Buchanan. One rather doubts that LePen shares Buchanan’s pro-Germanism but otherwise their positions are remarkably similar.

LePen’s daughter, Marine, has publicly distanced the Party from her father’s rhetoric while maintaining the essence of his positions. The National Front, far from being a French Nazi Party, is much more akin to the movement of Charles Maurras in the 1930’s, L’action Francaise, without the obsessive anti-Germanism and more up-to-date. (The National Front does not pine for the restoration of the Bourbons.) The National Front forms an interesting contrast with American conservative groups. Unlike American conservatives who have largely sold out to the Jews and the state of Israel, the National Front is historically literate and not the least bamboozled by Zionist propaganda.

Whether the National Front shall ever come to power in France remains an imponderable. What is clear is that the National Front is the real thing. It stands for France for Frenchmen, breaking Jewish-Masonic power and a return to a Europe of nations, not a Europe of Jewish international finance.

A PICTURE DRIPPING KOSHER RED

The old Soviet Union had a variety of motives in sponsoring “Palestine in Siberia” or the old Birobidzhan project. The reasons are expertly explained by Henry Felix Srebrnik in “Dreams of Nationhood: American Jewish Communists and the Soviet Birobidzhan project, 1924 -1951”. Writes Srebrnik:

“The Bolsheviks did their utmost to facilitate the social rehabilitation pf the Jewish petty bourgeoisie by promoting the formation of atrtisanal co-operatives, and by encouraging the constitution of Jewish agricultural collectives in areas of heavy Jewish population destined to become autonomous regions. The focus at first was on settlements in Belarus, Ukraine and especially, the Crimea. With the establishment of the Jewish autonomous districts – the Kalinindorf, the Stalindorf, and Naystotopol in Ukraine, plus Fraydorf and, later, Larindorf in the Crimea – Jews were settled in agricultural colonies. The campaign to settle déclassé Jews on the soil was widely publicized in the United States and elsewhere. The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (the “Joint”) and the World Union of Societies for Promotion of Artisanal and Agricultural Work Among the Jews of the World (World ORT Union) already active in helping poor Jews in eastern Europe, provided money for projects in the Soviet settlements. The American Jewish Joint Agricultural Corporation (the “Agri-Joint”) had been formed by the Joint in 1924 specifically to aid Jewish farmers in the Soviet Union.”

“Felix Warburg, chair of the Joint, had been active in the work for Russian Jews in the 1920’s, providing a gift of $400,000 at a meeting of the Joint in Philadelphia on September 12-13, 1925. Dr. Joseph A. Rosen, the Joint’s specialist on Jewish colonization in the USSR, told the gathering that ‘the Jews in Russia, under the present government, feel safer now than under any other Government.’ Rosen had been instrumental in convincing the Joint to form the Agri-Joint, which provided aid to the KOMERD in creating Jewish agricultural colonies in the southern Ukraine and Crimea in the 1920’s and 1930’s. In 1927, Warburg visited the Jewish agricultural colonies in the Crimea and Ukraine and wrote to James N. Rosenberg, the chair of the Agri-Joint, that he was ‘profoundly impressed’ by the ‘rapid progress’ being made, thanks to the ‘splendid understanding and assistance’ of the Soviets. Jews had fully vindicated themselves as farmers, he declared, and he became ‘an enthusiastic believer in the land settlement work’”.

“Rosenberg told the New York Times after returning from a visit to the Soviet Union in June 1926 that ‘These Jews, hitherto herded in ghettos, are eagerly seizing the chance now given them to settle on the soil, the same as other Russians.’ The newspaper called him ‘the American father of the back-to-the-soil movement among the Jews of the former Pale of Settlement.’ Rosenberg noted that since 1923, more than 100,000 Jews had settled on more than one million acres in the Crimea, Ukraine and White Russia. He said that ‘The Jewish farmer destroys a thousand blind prejudices against the Jew’ and ‘is an irrefutable demonstration of the Jewish aptitude for a hardy, natural life of productive toil.’ In any case, with immigration to the U.S. curtailed, the economically ‘surplus’ Jewish population in Russia can absorb would-be emigrants.’”

“When the writer Elias Tobenkin visited the Soviet Union in 1933, he was especially impressed with the Jewish settlements in the Crimea. ‘The dream of a Jewish republic on the shores of the Black Sea won the sympathy of Jews the world over. American Jews responded with utmost generosity,’ he wrote. With the help of the Agri-Joint, the farms were a greater success. William Zuckerman, too, touted the success of the Crimean settlements. The Crimea had an excellent geographic location, enjoying good transportation by land or sea. Near major centers of population, it was itself more sparsely populated and, being almost an island, isolated enough to become a compact Jewish-majority territory. Its excellent climate and soil made it ‘the California of Russia’, Zuckerman exclaimed. The Crimea also appealed to Jews abroad. Non-Zionist organizations such as the ORT and the Joint ‘flocked to the banner of the Crimea’ and answered the GEZERD’s appeals for funds. Jewish nationalists, including Folkists, Bundists and territorialists, approved of the idea, while some Zionists saw it as a ‘second Palestine, a Zion of the Diaspora’. A few even dreamt of a ‘Greater Zionism” embracing both the Crimea and Palestine.”

“But a Jewish Crimea was not to be. Land was in great demand in the European areas of the USSR, and Jews faced hostility from native Tatars and Ukrainians. So the Yevsektsia and GEZERD began to look for larger, more remote areas in which to settle Jews. The plan was to move as many Jews as possible to a parcel of rich, entirely undeveloped land on the easternmost borders of Siberia where, freed from the bourgeois trader of the shetl, they would form collective farms and transform themselves into a strapping class of Soviet peasantry. Their presence in the east would also help safeguard against a Chinese or Japanese invasion. Some considered the project a shrewd means by which to neutralize Zionist sentiments among the Jewish masses in the Pale of Settlement. Thousands of Soviet Jews would see an opportunity to escape poverty and anti-Semitic violence and become part of a longstanding dream: a Jewish homeland – but in the USSR. The development of a national area for Jews might also help reduce anti-Semitism in the cities in Belarus, European Russia, and Ukraine where Jews competed with other nationalities for scarce resources.’”

(Srebrnik, pp/10-12)

These are most amazing passages. They show the active collaboration of American Jewry with the Jewish Bolsheviks in setting up vast Jewish Communist agricultural communes in the Crimea next to the Black Sea. That this collaboration was based not just on a humanitarian desire to help brother Jews, but also on an active sympathy for the Communist system is shown by the quotation from Joseph Rosen. This assistance involved vast sums of money funneled to Russia through the American Jewish Committee, the Joint Distribution Committee, the Agri-Joint, Mr. Felix Warburg, the banker and Mr. Julius Rosenwald of Sears, Roebuck and Company. The agricultural collectives represented a Jewish dream of a “greater Palestine” encompassing not just the Holy Land but also the Jewish Communist Motherland in Russia. It was a scheme for Jewish nationality within a Communist system linked to, and allied with, Zionist-Marxism in Palestine. The third link in this system was the Soviet Birobidzhan project. Known as “Palestine in Siberia” Birobidzhan aimed to give Soviet Jews the nationality they craved away from the other Soviet peoples who despised them. Formally inaugurated by Stalin in 1928, Birobidzhan was the formal Soviet alternative to Zionism. Its theoretical advantages were that it was located within socialist Russia and was not inhabited by Arabs hostile to a Jewish state in their country. It also was launched just before the 1929 riots in Palestine, so damaging to Zionist pretensions, broke out.

As the extended quotation from Srebrnik’s book shows, Jews in America were most enthusiastic about both the Jewish Communist Crimean colonies and the Birobidzhan project in the 1920’s and later into the 1930’s. This enthusiasm had its roots in the fact that many American Jews had emigrated from the revolutionary areas in Russia in the 1880’s and 1890’s. Their relatives who remained behind had made the 1917 revolutions. Thus, Communism traveled back and forth from Russia to America, courtesy of the same ethnicity. Many, many Jews from America toured the Jewish Communist agricultural colonies in the Crimea, always returning with glowing praise. Both Felix Warburg and Joseph Rosen were two such. The reciprocity between American and Soviet Jews on this issue, as well as the extensive fund raising and coordination of efforts in keeping the colonies flourishing, is one of the best practical examples of the Jewish internationalism flourishing behind the hammer and sickle. It is common these days, thanks to Zionist media disinformation, to condemn Communism as a system which “persecuted” Jews. But as these documented facts show, there was a time when Jews gladly cooperated with a system that they regarded as an outreach of their power. These facts are easily verifiable from Jewish reference works – and they paint a picture dripping kosher red.

You confuse my limited typing skills with my grammar. You need less epistemological nonsense and more grounding in facts. I have both the facts and the analytical ability that you lack. Here is one more example.

THE REAL PROOF OF JEWISH COMPLICITY IN COMMUNISM

Although Jews have evolved some rather clever techniques for explaining away their complicity in Communism, the proofs of that complicity are not hard to find. Two of the best proofs are: (1) the Yiddish Communist press and (2) the Jewish agricultural settlements in Russia. Anyone who has studied the Communist press pre-World War Two knows that it was disproportionately published in Yiddish world wide. That would certainly indicate a Jewish connection with Communism. The flourishing of Jewish Communist agricultural collective farms in Ukraine, the Crimea and especially the Birobidzhan project in Siberia also demonstrate the Jewish Communist connection.

Anti-Communists sometimes put too much faith in lists of Jewish commissars. Although there is little doubt that Jews were disproportionately involved in the Soviet commissariats at all levels, lists can be disputed on many grounds, not the least of which is the fact that lists are constantly changing, as are percentages of ethnicity. Thus, one list may be adjusted by including some names but not others. Lists then, are indicative but not determinative. Consistent sympathies based on ethnicity all over the globe are much more reliable.

Jews know that their sympathies have always been consistently pro-Communist for decades. This fact is much more damaging to them than Jewish names in the commissariats. When the largest circulation Communist magazine in the United States is the Morning Freiheit, published in Yiddish, with a circulation of thousands, that fact is much harder to explain away than the fact that seven out of ten gulag commissars in the 1930’s were Jews. An individual Jew with Communist sympathies means nothing. But if the student of the subject notices a Yiddish Communist newspaper in Buenos Aires named Der Royter Shtern (The Red Star) or notices that the American Communist Party always had a publication entitled Jewish Affairs, then that commonality of language and ethnicity is much more convincing.

An individual Jew who moves from New York to Moscow to practice Communism proves nothing. But when thousands of Jews move from Canada, America and Argentina to the Soviet Far East in response to the siren call of Joseph Stalin, that fact is very indicative of pro-Communist sympathies. American Birobidzhan Committee (Ambijan) and the Canadian ICOR (Jewish Colonization Society for Russia) were not organizations of just a few Jews. They were mass organizations including thousands of Jews all over North America loyally committed to the hammer and sickle. The Joint Distribution Committee and the Agri-Joint were not minor community councils. They were lavishly funded organizations headed by the luminaries of Jewry. These organizations expended major funds establishing Jewish collective farms in Soviet Russia.

These are the real facts that establish the Jewish Communist connection. These are the facts that should be hammered on, again and again, not whether Lavrenti Beria was Armenian or Jewish.

http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/history/5813