Maybe a “post-modern foreign policy” is something like that favored by Obama legal advisor and point man on transnationalism, Harold Koh.

(Eric Holder is likely on board too, as part of his agenda to criminalize individuals in the former administration and/or show the world the grand American legal system by granting citizens’ rights to jihadists who have already begged for martyrdom, at the cost of somewhere between $200 million and a billion, depending on how long the dog and pony show were to drag on)

The transnationalist impulse is basically one to subject the United States to the whims and dictates of the “international community” (the international community, in case you were wondering, is 6 guys at the EU) and to bring the judicial system of the United States under the direction of bodies like the UN’s International Criminal Court at the Hague.

It all fits in nicely with Harold Koh’s (and others surrounding and advising this President) notion of putting big holes in that silly, antiquated, non-post-modern notion of United States’ “sovereignty”.

In a world of enlightened, post-modern foreign policy, will all the asshats in Yemen and Pakistan (many asshats are in Britain, too) abandon their ideas of blowing the crapola out of the United States and other free countries and enslaving any infidels they allow to live ?

Will Hamas and Hezbollah (not to mention their biggest sponsor and enabler, Iran) abandon their mission to wipe Israel off the map ? Will that nasty little fellow Arachnid-jihad turn to peace and love ? Will the lion lie down with the lamb ?

(For the record, indications at this point are that the tea partiers understand the detrimental, ticket splitting effects of creating a 3rd party and will, instead, back Republican candidates.)