D’oh! @ 182: an interesting compilation but one-sided. are you going to pretend there was no science at all supporting the alleged problems with DDT? the junkscience lists alleges mistaken DDT readings, but doesn’t list any actual occurrences of these mistaken readings. my recollection circa 1970 was reduced pelican populations in Los Angeles. were these chance, caused by other factors that vanished just as DDT was banned?

Interesting, but without presenting both sides, I cannot find it convincing. It would be nice for the future, if it were correct.