Pascal (the derivative) 135 said about the CRU liars:

“… we should still make an offer so they can reclaim some respectability.”

It appears that the folks at CRU are “digging-in” and sticking with their story, refer to:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/29/ipcc-climate-change-leaked-emails

When caught telling a bald face lie, a good tactic is to become wildly indignant and then change the subject.

The MSM tried to suppress this story but it’s leaking out anyway (inept buffoons). The timing was good to foul up the UN climate summit in Copenhagen. This raises the unasked question about who really were the “Russian hackers” who spilled the beans on this scientific fraud. Who ever did it knew what they were doing. There are some very powerful interests that stand to lose lots of money if AGW becomes established canon. One suspects the “Russian hackers” were not just script kiddies having some fun on the public library’s computer.