Lancet, the formerly highly respected medical journal, apparently felt no shame whatsoever from its previous total bogus-science outing (the science of statistical sampling was the victim in Lancet’s Iraq war casualties report, which came out juuuust before the 2004 election).
***
BTW, as i sit here watching the FoxBizNews lineup of Saturday morning business shows, the Climategate eruption is coming up over and over, and it appears the minimizers are planning to use the term “peer-reviewed” as their last-ditch debate-ender.
Too bad the other guests mostly haven’t seen the evidence that we blog-readers are seeing –of long-term wide-spread ”peer review” rigging, influencing, bribing, intimidating, and other employments of the the usual tools (excepting –so far –Torquemada’s ingenious toolkit) of installation of deterministic orthodoxy.
