“The military will look at all this closely and decide if there is any mental or physical illness, whether this is just a lonely guy with a remote personality who got a bad officer evaluation report and lost the confidence of his peers, maybe withdrew into religion as solace. What could we have missed? How could we do better?”

“Withdrew into religion”, eh? Casscells unintentionally admits the truth here, that religion might be at issue, though he will not follow up that line of thought. What might that religion be teaching its adherents? What might that religion require of its followers? How does that religion require unbelievers be treated? What is that religion’s overarching goal? These are questions that cannot and will not be asked, because multiculturalism is the official policy of our government.

I am certain that “Letting a Muslim into our Army is dangerous” will not be an answer to “What could we have missed?”, and that more appeasement will be the answer to “How could we do better?”