I could not disagree with Wretchard more. First, the idea of a notional nation or centrality of religion over nationalism and identity is as dead as the Holy Roman Empire. You cannot call back the bullet.
Said bullet already being fired by the UN.
The BNP specifically cites the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples wrt Labor’s policy of flooding the UK with immigrants here.
Indigenous Peoples are Indigenous Peoples. In Britain, they are the Angles, Scots, Welsh, Celts, Saxons, Danes, etc. Under the UN Declaration they have primary rights. Just as Mexico has the right to prevent say, hordes of Germans descending on them and colonizing them and making them minorities in their own nations (and theoretically, Tibet to exclude Chinese or Egypt the Palestinians), so too do native Britons. Who are in this case White.
This is the bullet THAT CANNOT BE CALLED BACK. Group rights and identity ARE THE LOGIC OF THE AGE. Arguing that it would be nice if people were oriented towards God or notional ideas of a nation state are akin to arguing it would be nice if the Byzantine Empire had never fallen. It is completely irrelevant at the task at hand.
Which is a naked spoils fight over government goodies according to ethnic/racial identity.
This was the inevitable outcome of the bullet being fired (which is why many warned against it) but nevertheless, the bullet has been fired. It cannot EVER be called back. SOME form of the BNP is the future of EVERY nation on Earth. Period.
The US has uneasily been an Anglo-Celtic-African nation. With the African part being in one way or another, the deciding factor between the “Anglo” i.e. coastal, wealthy merchant/banking/leadership elite, and the Celtic, western, populist, frontier-entrepreneurial masses. The US cannot and will not ever cease being party Black. Blacks are going nowhere but here. The US always has been and always will be partly Black.
HOWEVER, the status-quo ante of Affirmative Action is no longer sustainable. It depended on good times rolling, a White population that found it a small cost (for Blacks basically not rioting much), with government a distant and not intrusive aspect of daily life. NOW, with “We Are All Socialists Now” being Newsweek’s mantra, government proposes to control EVERY aspect of life, health care, who gets what, the carbon rationing green police, government hiring being the only game in town for jobs, and all predicated on Blacks first on the Bus and Whites standing in the back (getting beat up like that White kid in St. Louis by a cheering Black crowd) metaphorically speaking if Whites protest too much.
Given that the US Census Bureau has the 2005-2007 Community Survey as 76% White and 12.5% Black, and the 2008 Estimates being 80% and 12.8% respectively, this is not even with Elite backing from wealthy Whites a sustainable political arrangement.
Changes ALREADY MADE by Obama cannot be unwound, and more changes to come will only make Government a PERMANENT aspect of life in all areas. This makes racial identity voting CRITICAL for the majority — facing discrimination by an alliance of minorities.
The key aspect of the alliance (women and women’s activist groups, note that the report cited was created by a female pol) has been White women who have allied themselves against White men, their chief political, economic, and cultural enemies. However, the naked spoils fights over slices of the pie have led more to conclude that the BNP is “a better deal” which is why you get the British National Ballet ballerina, a very respectable woman in her thirties, who had a child by a Chinese-Cuban man who is her common law husband, joining the BNP.
Duh the female converts to Islam. They want a dominating husband, who expresses “hard” masculinity and are perfectly willing to share him with other women (indeed that other women would want him and have him is proof he is desirable.) Only those putting women (falsely and in a way that denies their humanity of flaws and bad attributes) on a pedestal would fail to see the motivating desire to convert to Islam by women: they wish dominant/dominating husbands and don’t see any downside feeling “protected” by modern society. In other words the classic expression of female hypergamy.
Sandra Tsing Loh in her column on divorce noted how Scandinavian men were abjuring their effeminate countrymen for marriages to Muslim men. Note btw that polygamy plus Muslim men “hoarding’ the limited number of available women (Muslim women do not date unbelievers) is an unspoken pressure cooker for young men who now have every reason to hate.
