Poor Citizen, now I understand you, you are a moonbat, and bth and idiot and one wholly consumed by MSM/Democrat propaganda.

Wrong, and absurdly so! It was the American rejection of the Democrats by giving the GOP their first control of both houses of congress since Eisenhower than held the line against the economic treason of the Democrat Party. Had Clinton had his way, you would have seen the same sort of disaster we are experiencing now. Granted, they barely held the line. Beyond that, it was the wave of small and mid sized firms created by the Reagan tax and regulator reforms , more or less held in line by Bush Sr., that lead to most of the real prosperity of the 1990′s. About the only thing that Clinton may be lauded for would be some small decrease in capital gains, which in any event he had to get through a GOP congress. And please spare me the nonsense of “surpluses”. What real surpluses Clinton might have come up with were due to gutting the military, and we all now know the ramifications of that. In fact, most of the so called surplus of those years were projected and therefore pure fiction. More to the point, it was Clinton that ramped up the disastrous policies surrounding the CRA, Freddie and Fannie, and push forward all the hustles with MBS’s and CDR’s.

So you are completely wrong here. This is irrefutable.

2000=2008 equals military failure=economic failure=mass tax cuts for big business/oil=financial meltdown, mass unemployment=Bush=la la land=you

This is chock-full of lies. There is not one truth here. What military failures are we talking about? Afghanistan fell in a month with what, 2 US combat deaths? Iraq was a brilliant campaign, and the armed force adapted well over a few years to a wholly different form of warfare. What are the failures here? There really were none. This is just a fiction of the MSM. That you believe them does not speak well of you.

Iraq was a brilliant campaign. a few thousand deaths. You seem completely ignorant of military history if you assert that it was failure. Merely because the Democrat controlled media tells you that they are failures, does not make them so. Nor do the murmuring down at your local Starbucks make this so. You need to learn to think for yourself. If there were problems, they were mostly cause by the filthy and traitorous Democrat Party politicizing the war. Had they not stood against America, the enemy might have not been so embolden and things would have got better sooner. You are know doubt quite young, but were you older you would remember ow the Democrats betrayed the USA and her allies back then, much like they are doing today. As for real military failure, one would have thought that Clinton would have taken the cake, but Obama is a complete disaster. He is not only undoing the advances of the prior 8 years, and those advances were considerable, he is really undoing all of the advances since 1943. He is destroying us as a super power and going around the world apologizing and humiliating America. We most likely will never get back to this level of power again. This is his actual intent and desire. He is a Marxist traitor. If you were actually concerned with military failure, you would be up in arms over all of this. But you are concerned with no such thing. So here you are not only wrong, but you are dishonorable.
So this comment is idiotic.

Economic failure? The economic boom on GWB was one of the most robust and prolonged of the post war period. Go have a look at the Dow or NASDAQ for that period. The culprit here is, again, as always, the Democrat party. This time it was their redistribution regulations in the housing section and the attendant distortions of the market that pushed us over. Bush tried to do something about it, but they would not have it. It is true that he let Paulson spook him last summer, but seriously, it is starting to look more and more like the “Oct. Surprised was actually engineered. That your precious Democrats for you: Push us into an depression to get elected. Some fiscal responsibility here. In any event, the economic problems of the nation started when the Democrats took over congress in 2006. Moreover, GWB brilliantly navigated the nation through the economic fallout of 911. Had the Democrats been in charge we would have had a real disaster. So not only can this not be laid at the foot of the Democrat.

Obama has done more damage to our economy in less than a year than all of the GOP presidents in our history combined,

So you are extremely wrong here.

As for tis:

Now: any more questions?

You are just making a public fool out of yourself with childish retorts like this.
You are putting your ignorance, arrogance and immaturity on display for all the world to see. Wat is pathetic is that you imgine that you have done just the opposite.

Oh, and your real problem is that you spend to much time reading newspapers. They are lying to you, and you are too foolish to see it.

The real truth is out there. Try goggling around for it.