#87 RWE- “Gender Feminists” is one that really burns my barn down.

Although not a fixture of the english language, gender is a function of words-

Example’s include la mattequilla, La Lune, die Preis for feminine

And El burro, Il Pomodoro, or der Mond for masculine.

This stuff is junk science of the first order.

Men and women, boys and girls don’t have “gender”, they have [a] sex.

And its akin to your navel, or belly button: you’re born with either an innie, or an outie.

This is all a follow through of all that Frankfurt School nonsense taken all too seriously by those revolutionaries when the “proletariat” gave their “peoples” revolution talk of Marxian economics a pass and refused to join their treachery out on the streets.

With their hopes of “Glorious” this and that dashed, they seethed with resentment of the once vaunted “enlightened to action” proletariat, e.g. “the people’s” and plotted their psy-war against them all.

In a pickle, and facing obscurity, they considered and chose the subliminal route to re-engineer the ones, and specifically the institutions of those who had ignored and rejected them all, and now have taken over most places in any once great institution you can name, education and its curriculum “government agencies”, arts, entertainment and even your local church edifice.

If there was a plausibly jusifyable concept of “feminism” that once existed, it too has been hijacked for the purposes of “gender” reassignment, with variation the order of the day as long as any [of the] variation[s doesn't or] don’t go errant or retro and start resembling the old archetypal ones.

They keep tampering with it to stave off real human nature, because with man as the measure of all things, the perverse extremes we are going through are all justified, because man is perfectible.

Oh really?

Once I decided to give “feminism” as we know it a new derogatory moniker and I came up with “womenist”, as in the definition of the woman is that they are the womenist of the womenists, the ultimate ‘feminist’ who can do anything a man can do, only better, the ‘purest’ form of the feminist, etc., just as Pol Pot’s executioners and slave drivers used to point out that Pol Pot’s marxism was the “pure” form of [a] more perfect marxism, as opposed to the “compromised” form in, say China and elsewhere. Pol Pot had come closer to the ideal, and now you would either live up to it or die and be discarded in the name of “social justice”.

Or to quote Justice Janice Rodgers Brown: Communism- great for ants, a horror for humans.

Only to discover that feminists had already broken with the old feminist model and were already calling themselves now- “womenists”.