Whiskey: At the risk of pulling down your ire on top of me, let me say that while I certainly think you are onto a truth, it is not the sole truth nor is it the overarching truth.

Women are not in control of these event, they are being used as a section in a voting block, and are merely part of that block. That section by no means includes a plurality of all women in the country.
Obama is acting on behalf of the entire left–and no doubt foreign actors too–not just “leftist women”. In fact he is mostly acting for himself and whoever his paymasters are.

I think that you mistake the vocal few for the mass of women.

There is not this ground swell of women wishing treason on us by crippling the military. The game is much deeper and the players much more sinister than that.

You get a little megalomaniac about this stuff, you need to temper it a bit.
you are starting to depart from the real world.

You credit women with more power than they actually have in this world. Most Corp. management have essentially token positions for women at the higher levels–the real power people are mostly all men, and the struggles are rough. The technology sectors are almost entirely male. The real Democrat Political machine is run by men at the top, and most certainly at the regional and large city level. Note, those are not the people that you see as delegates at the national convention. Those are the guys that you go see of you own a cement company. I have heard you say that NGO’s are run by women and gays, and that is not really so. They are run by trust fund brats, who generally actually own the NGO’s, and the great majority of them are straight men. They call the shots.

These NGO’s are run like little principalities and with all the pomp of a court.
Most of the “management” plays CYA with the tyrant that runs them. That is why they are so irritable and grouchy.

A great deal of this younger female voting block you describe just votes for whomever they have been conned into thinking it is “cool” to vote for, they are not possessed of the sort of deliberationa or calculations that you attribute to them. If it were “hip” to vote conservative, they would vote conservative. They are not that deep or not really that vicious.

There are not hordes of women running around “hating the military”. I challenge you to prove that across this country women overwhelmingly hate the military, or even hate men.

It is unreasonable claim to make that because some “women” in the media hate the military, that all women do, or even a majority of them do. The military is one of the most popular insititutions in the country. Every soldier touches upon dozens of women in his family and his community and they are very supportive. A great many of those soldiers are women themselves. The Amy Smarts only represent a portion of American females. I have spent long periods of my life in close connection to the Armed Services and their communities and I can tell you that they are supported by millions upon millions of fine and patriotic American women.

I have also worked in media, and I can tell you that women to not “call the shots” in that world. The general public never sees the real power players in the media world. It is a rough place, that inner circle of power, and women rarely get even close to it. One really discovers this when one tries to sell them something that costs real money. You are rarely talking to a woman. It is more an issue of culture, those left wing prejudices, and many in that circle do not even realize that they are pushing a socialist agenda, not really. It is pure elitist contempt for the middle classes that is driving them, not some anti-male agenda. It is not all about gender. Sure they are a target demographic, but so are young urban men, and the young urban men make more money, BTW, as a demographic, a lot more, and they spend more.

You have valid points, I will not say that you do not, and I am glad you are out there posting, but you need to put them in perspective.

So this does not really answer my question.