Robohobo @53
Your characterization of illegal immigrants is spot-on. What elese could be expected from the spawn of human-sacrificers and Moorish-influenced conquistadors.

In the early 1770′s, “long-hunters”, British-Borderer-descended frontiersmen from Virginia south to north Georgia, often harvested deer pelts in the Indian country of what is now Tennessee and Kentucky. They traveled alone or in pairs trying to avoid detection. One famous episode is useful for evaluating the outcomes both in Britain and in the US.

A lone long-hunter was spotted and pursued by about a dozen Cherokees. He led the chase for an hour or so, loading his rifle as he ran, and when loaded stopping to drop the nearest pursuer. He felled half the Indians in this manner before the remainder lost interest in being the lead-Indian. The Borderer-descended immigrants did not come explicitly for genocide, but they were more than ready to do what it took to get the land. Their genes, and culture, are present throughout the South and Texas. These folks will not give the land back to Indians=Mexicans. Won’t happen. Ditto Britain regarding muslims.