A judge has tossed out Philip Berg’s lawsuit. There goes that shot.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D941NCJG0&show_article=1

Check out this odd bit.

[Judge]Surrick ruled that Berg lacked standing to bring the case, saying any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was “too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters.”

Any harm “too vague”? Is it me, or did the wise old judge just in effect say “it doesn’t matter the Constitution says about eligibility.”

The dissolution begins.