Belmont Club

By Richard Fernandez

Bio

Get Updates From Richard Fernandez
A Comment About

Sing for change

September 30, 2008 - 1:57 pm - by Richard Fernandez
Storm-Rider
2008-10-01 16:27:42

Biggie: “Changing those amendments would take a political consensus of some size. Where is the consensus to change either amendment?”

Wake up, son; it won’t depend on consensus – don’t you get it? Our first and second amendments will not come up for a vote; they will be rescinded, with the assistance of ACLU lawsuits, by Supreme Court case decisions – rescinded by a Marxist dominated Supreme Court after Barak Obama stacks the court with more Marxists. Un-Constitutional Supreme Court oligarchic power will take care of the job, without the consent of the governed. Wake the hell up – you are a frog in the pan – and you haven’t noticed the temperature slowly increasing.

Obama threatens freedom of speech – First Amendment:

“The Obama camp has been threatening television and radio stations to keep them from airing anti-Obama ads.”

newsmax.com/politics/Obama_Wants_NRA_Ads_Banne/2008/09/27/135118.html

“Earlier this week, NRA-PVF released a series of radio and television spots to educate gun owners and sportsmen about Barack Obama’s longstanding anti-gun record. In response to the NRA-PVF ads, a clearly panicked Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) are doing everything they can to hide Obama’s real record by mounting a coordinated assault on the First Amendment. They have gone to desperate and outrageous lengths to try to silence your NRA by bullying media outlets with threats of lawsuits if they run NRA-PVF’s ads. They have sent intimidating cease and desist letters to cable operators and television stations, threatening their FCC licenses if they run the ads.”

nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=4192

Obama threatens freedom to defend life – Second Amendment:

“Obama supported local handgun bans in the Chicago area by opposing any allowance for self-defense. Obama opposed an Illinois bill (SB 2165, 2004) that would have created an “affirmative defense” for a person who used a prohibited firearm in self-defense in his own home.”

gunbanobama.com/Default.aspx?NavGuid=c3d25dd2-7abd-4f24-8efd-d62bd977d7c2&ID=11574&Type=1