Jersey Joe,

Excuse me but Obama has a terrible record about telling the truth and a long history of seeking a disadvantageous reduction in our nuclear arsenal. He has no credibility at this point.

He and his party over the last two years have sought ruinous changes in our public policy that have drastically expanded our budget deficit, raised taxes, created new environmental and other regulatory obstacles to expanding private business opportunities, bailed out many financial and other interests unnecessarily, granted huge multibillion kickbacks to his supporters, defunded critical military programs and greatly restricted our freedoms in untold ways. Most of these efforts have been achieved with little public input behind closed doors. We still don’t know all the details of many of these scams long after they were approved. We have a right to be alarmed about such an important matter as nuclear security with guys like these in charge.

The American Public, not just Jon Kyl has the right to see the full details of this treaty with Obama’s track record. And as Buddy wrote, if this treaty is so critical why is it bring brought up during a lame duck session and not before? And why if we haven’t had ‘boots on ground’ for a year, is another six weeks so important? Why not a full review of this treaty or do ‘ we have to pass it to see what’s in it” again?