You know, if you look at the whole Atlantic cover, the photo’s she took really are a part of an attempted hit piece. The headline over McCain’s picture is “why war is his answer”. There’s another not-so-subliminal red headline in the upper corner feature the words “porn” and “adultery”. And according to Greenberg herself, the picture the Atlantic honcho’s did choose to run have McCain looking red-eyed and with “bad skin”. I’m not sure what “bad skin” is but his picture is certainly red-eyed which is usually also thought of being haggard.

I haven’t read the article yet, but I’ll be surprised if it’s not essentially a hit piece also.

I wonder if the editors of Atlantic aren’t so much annoyed that Greenberg kept back some pictures she took on their dime and with their say-so as that she then went out and bragged about it, and blew their cover as being “professional”.