@Gramps Larsen, good on yer.

@ Benj, Check it out,

http://www.frontiersman.com/articles/2008/09/08/breaking_news/doc48c1c8a60d6d9379155484.txt

I have to take the them Mayor at her word, the inquiries were not about banning or deselecting books, but at protecting the city from law suits. There was at the time a number of bits of litigation about the subject throughout the NW, especially in regards to porn in the public eye. Totally relevant to the job, and completely reasonable manner with which she sought to know the limits of her responsibility. Please note she responded with “nothing particular” and generally approached this and other interviews of heads of the various city agencies with questions pertaining to the function of the agency and their perceptions of those functions. In 1996? I think we can label the librarian as paranoid seeing as some on she did not have reason to particularly be chummy with was now her boss, and the climate of the NW at the time. Kudo’s to Palin, she took no advantage of the situation, kudo’s to the librarian, vigilance takes all forms I guess, tilting at imaginary windmills served her well.

Of course that is censoriousness, depending on who gets to twist the story first, and last.