#90 rhhardin
Hillary’s warning about consequences was then meant as a pointed statement to somebody that we’ll take you out if you try this again.
That somebody may be pretty high up.
A caller’s theory, here, the end of Armstrong and Getty 051310 H3, starting 26:45
I confess to being dubious at best, and this has not been that good a day, about the caller’s theory.
I just wonder what it would be about that warning that would counter the effect of decades of called American bluffs? And when you add in that it was delivered by Hillary, who is not the most threatening personality [except to Americans] on the international political scene the threat loses some of its sting. Further, officially she is a spokescritter for Buraq Hussein Obama. Name one Islamic leader who trembles in fear at the mere prospect of incurring the displeasure of “Teh Won”.
Until some unfortunate and unexpected set of circumstances causes something tragic [and hopefully exothermic] to happen to someone who is behind some of the attacks on us; followed shortly by at least one and perhaps more unfortunate circumstances from the same population group, I ain’t buying it. And I suspect no one else in that group will either.
Subotai Bahadur
