LOTM: “Yes he should have taken advantage of my proffered distinction between a defined expectation of support for some forms of pressure and undefined and open ended statements offering support to any 3rd parties acts in the name of pressure rather than resorting to personal criticism.”

(That could have been written in Greek without much loss of clarity.)

I did not “support” “any 3rd parties [sic] acts”. You just read that in. That I do not speak specific disapproval of wrong behavior does not mean that I approve of it. Such a claim is illogical, unfair, and, connected with the suggestion of racism, it is offensive.

(Per your expressed thinking, I haven’t heard your disapproval of mugging, so maybe you should clear that up, otherwise you are lending support to mugging little old ladies.)

OK, I forgive you, but understand that I am not going to bridle my words in order to clarify for you that I do not mean things that I have neither said nor implied. I don’t believe in that kind of wishy washy speech in this situation.

You might try studying a little logic. Maybe read Plato’s Meno and a few other of the dialogues where categories are analyzed.