<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/26/more-agw-controversy/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 02:23:35 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>More AGW Controversy</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Watts Up With That? describes the controversy surrounding New Zealand&amp;#8217;s official temperature readings after the Climate Science Coalition replotted the raw data and found the &amp;#8220;rising temperatures&amp;#8221; were really flat. The rises in temperatures reported by the official (NIWA) figures were the result of adjustments.  However, the agency defended its adjustments.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:42:48 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Richard Fernandez]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/richard-fernandez/2009/11/26/more-agw-controversy-n189420</link></item></channel></rss>