<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A writing exercise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opaobie</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/#comment-80669</link>
		<dc:creator>Opaobie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=6720#comment-80669</guid>
		<description>With Obama, every silver lining is filled with a dark cloud.  He had to slip in negatives about America, and a cynic could even find some veiled praise for the shooter disguised as praise for our troops.  He failed to acknowledge that it was a terrorist attack, no surprise, but he further blurred the picture by injecting the &quot;crazed killer who snapped&quot; canard.  Has the paperwork to award Purple Hearts been initiated yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Obama, every silver lining is filled with a dark cloud.  He had to slip in negatives about America, and a cynic could even find some veiled praise for the shooter disguised as praise for our troops.  He failed to acknowledge that it was a terrorist attack, no surprise, but he further blurred the picture by injecting the &#8220;crazed killer who snapped&#8221; canard.  Has the paperwork to award Purple Hearts been initiated yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myth buster</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/#comment-80666</link>
		<dc:creator>myth buster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=6720#comment-80666</guid>
		<description>36. There are two problems with that- 1. You can&#039;t sue the Federal Government without its consent, and 2. The occupational hazard doctrine, which states that an employer is immune to lawsuits for injuries or deaths that result from known hazards of a job.  That said, these men and women died in the line of duty, and therefore the next of kin is entitled to $100,000 plus cash value on all banked leave, plus hostile fire pay for this month (not entirely sure about the last one, but they ought to get it, because this man should be deemed an enemy) and 90 days free housing or BAH.  In addition, widow(er)s are entitled to 55% of the fallen soldiers pension, which vests immediately upon death, until they either die or remarry.

Wounded soldiers are entitled to free medical treatment, and shall be placed on light duty until they recover, at which point it will be determined whether they are fit to resume duty, or shall be discharged for disability.  If they are discharged for injuries sustained in the line of duty, they are absolved of all service obligations outstanding, and are therefore able to keep all bonuses advanced to them, as well as cashing out their leave; in addition, discharges for disability cause at least a partial vesting of the soldier&#039;s pension, regardless of years of service.  If deemed a hostile fire act, as it should be, the wounded soldiers shall receive hostile fire pay for this month, and will receive hostile fire pay again in December if they are still hospitalized at 0001 on December 1.

38. Everything sounds great except the number of dead (14) and the MIA part.  MIA stands for Missing in Action, which these men and women clearly are not.  They were wounded in the line of duty, but we know exactly where they are and how they&#039;re doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36. There are two problems with that- 1. You can&#8217;t sue the Federal Government without its consent, and 2. The occupational hazard doctrine, which states that an employer is immune to lawsuits for injuries or deaths that result from known hazards of a job.  That said, these men and women died in the line of duty, and therefore the next of kin is entitled to $100,000 plus cash value on all banked leave, plus hostile fire pay for this month (not entirely sure about the last one, but they ought to get it, because this man should be deemed an enemy) and 90 days free housing or BAH.  In addition, widow(er)s are entitled to 55% of the fallen soldiers pension, which vests immediately upon death, until they either die or remarry.</p>
<p>Wounded soldiers are entitled to free medical treatment, and shall be placed on light duty until they recover, at which point it will be determined whether they are fit to resume duty, or shall be discharged for disability.  If they are discharged for injuries sustained in the line of duty, they are absolved of all service obligations outstanding, and are therefore able to keep all bonuses advanced to them, as well as cashing out their leave; in addition, discharges for disability cause at least a partial vesting of the soldier&#8217;s pension, regardless of years of service.  If deemed a hostile fire act, as it should be, the wounded soldiers shall receive hostile fire pay for this month, and will receive hostile fire pay again in December if they are still hospitalized at 0001 on December 1.</p>
<p>38. Everything sounds great except the number of dead (14) and the MIA part.  MIA stands for Missing in Action, which these men and women clearly are not.  They were wounded in the line of duty, but we know exactly where they are and how they&#8217;re doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna V.</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/#comment-80664</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=6720#comment-80664</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hey, at least 10 of the 14 wouldn’t have voted for him anyway (assuming the cabal would have figured a way to get the fetus on the Chicago voter roles somehow).&lt;/i&gt;

I agree, we need to work on that.  After all, the Democrats have been rip-roaringly successful in getting the dead on the Chicago voter rolls somehow.  It would be  only fair to garner votes from the other end of the life cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hey, at least 10 of the 14 wouldn’t have voted for him anyway (assuming the cabal would have figured a way to get the fetus on the Chicago voter roles somehow).</i></p>
<p>I agree, we need to work on that.  After all, the Democrats have been rip-roaringly successful in getting the dead on the Chicago voter rolls somehow.  It would be  only fair to garner votes from the other end of the life cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumcrook®</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/#comment-80661</link>
		<dc:creator>rumcrook®</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=6720#comment-80661</guid>
		<description>yes barry is awsome. just for the record, is this guy expounding on barry&#039;s awsome delivery of a shout out? just prior to fitting in a few words on the massacre? or some other speach, becuase his shout out really brought a tear to my eye/////</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes barry is awsome. just for the record, is this guy expounding on barry&#8217;s awsome delivery of a shout out? just prior to fitting in a few words on the massacre? or some other speach, becuase his shout out really brought a tear to my eye/////</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/#comment-80660</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=6720#comment-80660</guid>
		<description>Hey, at least 10 of the 14 wouldn&#039;t have voted for him anyway (assuming the cabal would have figured a way to get the fetus on the Chicago voter roles somehow).

What&#039;s the issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, at least 10 of the 14 wouldn&#8217;t have voted for him anyway (assuming the cabal would have figured a way to get the fetus on the Chicago voter roles somehow).</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rc</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/#comment-80656</link>
		<dc:creator>rc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=6720#comment-80656</guid>
		<description>Wretchard,

By that speech alone, I would vote for you as POTUS.  You are simply head and shoulders above our current incumbent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wretchard,</p>
<p>By that speech alone, I would vote for you as POTUS.  You are simply head and shoulders above our current incumbent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heyyoukidsgetoffmylawn</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/#comment-80655</link>
		<dc:creator>heyyoukidsgetoffmylawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=6720#comment-80655</guid>
		<description>buddy larsen
 
Not unlike Burt Lancaster in &quot;The Swimmer&quot;, I&#039;ve been dropping in on select websites and noticed, well, not to put to fine a point on it, a certain indefinable quality. 

Is it just me, or are people right miffed?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV0MKP0wyak

Too soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buddy larsen</p>
<p>Not unlike Burt Lancaster in &#8220;The Swimmer&#8221;, I&#8217;ve been dropping in on select websites and noticed, well, not to put to fine a point on it, a certain indefinable quality. </p>
<p>Is it just me, or are people right miffed?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV0MKP0wyak" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV0MKP0wyak</a></p>
<p>Too soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgdp</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/#comment-80652</link>
		<dc:creator>jgdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=6720#comment-80652</guid>
		<description>In response to Tony #18:&quot;Let’s not gnash and groan, let’s focus on something.&quot;

Let&#039;s get this worthless embarrassment of a turd out of office!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Tony #18:&#8221;Let’s not gnash and groan, let’s focus on something.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get this worthless embarrassment of a turd out of office!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgdp</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/#comment-80648</link>
		<dc:creator>jgdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=6720#comment-80648</guid>
		<description>“I respectfully resign from the Office of President of the United States based on the facts that I’m completely unqualified to be a leader”.

 THERE IS CHANGE WE CAN ALL BELIEVE IN and sincerely hope for!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I respectfully resign from the Office of President of the United States based on the facts that I’m completely unqualified to be a leader”.</p>
<p> THERE IS CHANGE WE CAN ALL BELIEVE IN and sincerely hope for!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgdp</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/11/a-writing-exercise/#comment-80647</link>
		<dc:creator>jgdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=6720#comment-80647</guid>
		<description>This is indeed what should have been said, but obama is a worthless amateur and will NEVER be professional enough to say this!  He is a rank poseur and has ABSOLUTELY NO  business being president.  The sooner this fool is out-of-office by any means the better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is indeed what should have been said, but obama is a worthless amateur and will NEVER be professional enough to say this!  He is a rank poseur and has ABSOLUTELY NO  business being president.  The sooner this fool is out-of-office by any means the better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

