<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/05/offensive-defense/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 19:10:08 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Offensive defense</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Recent news articles outline the extents of the debate over what constitutes a licit national defense.  Those who are against using war as an counterterrorism method have argued that the US ought to use police and intelligence methods &amp;#8212; rather than military solutions &amp;#8212; when fighting al-Qaeda. An article in Wired, for example, describes a national &amp;#8220;hit squad&amp;#8221; that can be used instead of expeditionary forces.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:41:15 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Richard Fernandez]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/richard-fernandez/2009/11/05/offensive-defense-n189359</link></item></channel></rss>