They do not love freedom, instead they love and covet power. They have through trickery and manipulation kept an entire class of people as their slaves for what, 6 generations now? Even as we speak they spread their lies into our youth. Many the very people freed by the conflict you quoted from. And for what end? For the sole purpose of defeating our very principles of equity by using those principles against us. They are not Americans, not as defined by those that suffered to create and sustain our nation. The vain narcissists who seek to enslave us care only for themselves and seek to use all weaker than they as a commodity, they are soul-less relativist.

I call them beyond the pale, and I sir am most certainly not alone. If there are any of them left when this is over (if we are left) then we’ll discuss re-education. I don’t expect them to sing Silent Night with us once this gets lit, they are that far out of bounds now.

They are still our countrymen, and even if The Good Guys win this CWII, their widows and daughters and sons will still be our countrymen. Who has the standing or legitimacy to declare some Americans Beyond The Pale?

My usage. It is an acronym for Those Who Are No Longer Our Countrymen. Given the nature of the Cold Civil War, and the rising temperature; we are beyond mere differences between Democrat and Republican, or even Left and Right. At this point we do not share a culture, a language [we use the same words, but they convey totally different meanings], or a view of how the world is. Indeed, there is as much difference between us and Wahabists as between us and those I refer to as TWANLOC. Mind you, Wahabists and TWANLOC are not the same, just both are different from us along different axis’. They do share on thing, which leads to a degree of mutual support between them. It is a belief that “The enemy of my enemy (in this case us) is my friend.”.

The acronym works for me, YMMV.

Subotai Bahadur

see http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/08/22/a-tribute-to-our-decency/#comment-147

Since 90% or so of the communications industry is already reliable to this admin’s aims, the ‘reform’ subject of the ‘national conference can mean only one thing –that other 10% or so has to be that which “requires reform”.

The czars, sez Beck, are the muscle, the exoskeleton, of a “…machine being built that is awaiting ‘an event’, which will come, one way or another, and then they will ‘turn the machine on’.

Beck is asking for people to start archiving little-known info on the czars –as he thinks the web will be getting scrubbed before long.

Look, it’s bad –it’s real bad. the czars is where the head reds are –the project managers who overwrote all these magically-appearing 1300 page mock-English boilerplate American-suicide bills.

He’s doing Mark Lloyd now –the “diversity czar” (which is a hide, he’s gonna ‘do’ RTFP) –showing a videotape of the FCC’s sudden new Political Officer. in the film he’s talking, sweating out Hugo Chavez. No, not that HC WILL take over the Venezuelan communications industry –but that he WON’T.

He’s very explicit –he says it straight –i’m not interpreting, and Lloyd ain’t up to litotes.

And he’s your communications industry czar. He’s as commie as they come, sorry no joke, and he *is*your*communications*czar.

You’ve got to find a way to see these shows –starting with Monday’s i guess.

If we’re gonna fight these people, Glenn Beck is a suddenly indispensable weapon. see the shows, or read the transcripts if ya can –

Your comment about promising maybe half a loaf hits home. If our representatives are not going to insist on enforcing the rule of law (especially enforcing the constitution), then we are not being represented and are on our own. I’m thinking that is why more of us are getting involved (tea-party, town-hall) that would ordinarily keep quiet.