You may be right. This whole thing in Iran could fizzle out without any support from anyone. But, that would become apparent in a few days. If the opposition has any legs, they will show. If they do, then support should have an effect in a relatively short time.

If the opposition does not have any legs, that will also become apparent in a few days. We are not talking about waiting years for this to happen. If they fail now, and the Mullahs crack down on them, it will be a very long time before they rise again. In which case you will be right in your assessment of the nukes, etc.

Then again, why does it all have to come down to Obama? Maybe someone else will help the opposition. There are many countries with the ability and the interest to see Iran change.

Many of the countries we accuse of helping or appeasing Iran may step in. Remember they work with the Iranians out of their own national interests, and not because they like the Mullahs. If they help change the Government, they will have a better partner to deal with. Russia, France, other Europeans and even China come to mind.

This may not be a great thing for the US, since they would show us off and take credit for doing what we could not. But, it would still rid us of the radical mullahs, which is a good thing in its own rite.

I never expected Obama to go after North Korea. I just said if we must flex our muscles, it would be better place to do it. Obama does not have muscles to flex.

Hey, the Saudis being so ardent to make the Iranians “feel the heat” and spending $715 million in last week’s Lebanese elections can help. That amount will buy a whole lot of weapons needed in this conflict. Nah! There are no Sunnis to support. Nix the thought.

Obama must be pissed. That is a lot more than they funneled to him, and per capita comes down to over 100 times more. Eat his heart out Obama!

I guess he will not be kissing the Saudi king’s hand again! Well, we can always hope.

Cadmus

Thus, realistically in the near term if we follow your view, we are left with nukes sprouting everywhere from the hands of Dinnerjacket and the Norks, unless Israel takes out Iran’s nukes. As good as it would be to free Iran, as long as Buraq and the Dems are in power, it is not going to happen. And the threat to the free world of Iranian nukes takes precedence over waiting out Buraq to free Iran.

Buraq’s principle goal is cramming Marxism, with more than a touch of Islam, down the throats of the American people. Defending America and the free world from the likes of Iran and North Korea is nowhere on his agenda.

People can come up with all sorts of great scenarios where America would not only defend it’s interests, but could make the world a better place. But America under Buraq is not that country that fights for freedom anymore.

You said: We’re in the midst of a major coup, and the message making it work is that the Democrats are done with the two-party system, are done because they can be, because they’ve proved they can and will make the nation ungovernable otherwise.

I ask: Doesn’t this mean the end of the two-party system either way? I mean that what they’re doing is clearly criminal, and if we are fortunate enough to overthrow this regime against their adament and vociferous objections, then how can we ever allow them to be re-elected? The ones we don’t hang that is.