<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One more day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:06:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: njcommuter</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/#comment-48824</link>
		<dc:creator>njcommuter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=3419#comment-48824</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Buddy Larson&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, how did we end up with a committee chair seniority system anyway? How freaking Bolshevik can ya get? Merit –or lotto –anything but the crap system results we’re getting now.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The Constitution provides that the House and Senate shall make their own rules.  This is an area where I fear that a cure might be worse than the disease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Buddy Larson</b></p>
<blockquote><p>Yes, how did we end up with a committee chair seniority system anyway? How freaking Bolshevik can ya get? Merit –or lotto –anything but the crap system results we’re getting now.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Constitution provides that the House and Senate shall make their own rules.  This is an area where I fear that a cure might be worse than the disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/#comment-48647</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=3419#comment-48647</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s three amendments:

-A sunset amendment. All laws are required to have a sunset established no longer than ten years.

-An amendment that states: Tax and spending increases will require a two thirds majority in both houses of congress. Tax and spending cuts will require a minimum of 40% of congressional votes to get passed.

-Flat tax amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s three amendments:</p>
<p>-A sunset amendment. All laws are required to have a sunset established no longer than ten years.</p>
<p>-An amendment that states: Tax and spending increases will require a two thirds majority in both houses of congress. Tax and spending cuts will require a minimum of 40% of congressional votes to get passed.</p>
<p>-Flat tax amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy larsen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/#comment-48507</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=3419#comment-48507</guid>
		<description>Yes, how did we end up with a committee chair seniority system anyway? How freaking Bolshevik can ya get? Merit --or lotto --anything but the crap system results we&#039;re getting now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, how did we end up with a committee chair seniority system anyway? How freaking Bolshevik can ya get? Merit &#8211;or lotto &#8211;anything but the crap system results we&#8217;re getting now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomw</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/#comment-48504</link>
		<dc:creator>tomw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=3419#comment-48504</guid>
		<description>21:unsk-yup
41:njcommuter-you put in a lot of thought
53:speakeasy-real close

 If the job of politician is relegated to a service rather than a career with retirement packages and health benefits, it would be a lot less atractive to those who would pursue it as a career, or professional politician.
 The rules of the Senate and House usurp the equality of each vote.  Those representatives that have seniority in effect multiply the power of their constituents.  Take away the power granted by seniority, and there would be a lot less clamor for re-election.
 None of this requires constitutional convention, but sure could shake up DC.
tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21:unsk-yup<br />
41:njcommuter-you put in a lot of thought<br />
53:speakeasy-real close</p>
<p> If the job of politician is relegated to a service rather than a career with retirement packages and health benefits, it would be a lot less atractive to those who would pursue it as a career, or professional politician.<br />
 The rules of the Senate and House usurp the equality of each vote.  Those representatives that have seniority in effect multiply the power of their constituents.  Take away the power granted by seniority, and there would be a lot less clamor for re-election.<br />
 None of this requires constitutional convention, but sure could shake up DC.<br />
tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njcommuter</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/#comment-48487</link>
		<dc:creator>njcommuter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=3419#comment-48487</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll add another possible amendment:

That every tax or other levy be laid upon real persons, not upon corporations or other entities created by the legal system, and that every tax that must be collected by one person or entity in a transaction with another must be disclosed fully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll add another possible amendment:</p>
<p>That every tax or other levy be laid upon real persons, not upon corporations or other entities created by the legal system, and that every tax that must be collected by one person or entity in a transaction with another must be disclosed fully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy larsen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/#comment-48437</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=3419#comment-48437</guid>
		<description>or spartan/helote. ok what the hell, master/slave. Ask a Californian on the payee end --if you can find one that ain&#039;t busy packing a moving van.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or spartan/helote. ok what the hell, master/slave. Ask a Californian on the payee end &#8211;if you can find one that ain&#8217;t busy packing a moving van.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy larsen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/#comment-48428</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=3419#comment-48428</guid>
		<description>Public sector unions are a terminal civic disease --look at California. And what is a public sector union *for* anyway? If a union is for labor to collectively bargain with capital, what is a &lt;i&gt;public sector&lt;/i&gt; union to bargain wth? There is no capital to form the other side. There is only the tax revenue --which is expense, not capital. The whole structural concept is absurdist and Kafka-esque. It makes every civil servant a monopoly-entrepreneur with a captive market, who can&#039;t be fired, and is owed an expensive lifetime care at the captive&#039;s expense. yes, Kafka.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public sector unions are a terminal civic disease &#8211;look at California. And what is a public sector union *for* anyway? If a union is for labor to collectively bargain with capital, what is a <i>public sector</i> union to bargain wth? There is no capital to form the other side. There is only the tax revenue &#8211;which is expense, not capital. The whole structural concept is absurdist and Kafka-esque. It makes every civil servant a monopoly-entrepreneur with a captive market, who can&#8217;t be fired, and is owed an expensive lifetime care at the captive&#8217;s expense. yes, Kafka.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no mo uro</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/#comment-48416</link>
		<dc:creator>no mo uro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=3419#comment-48416</guid>
		<description>Lots of good suggestions here.

I&#039;d add two more.

1.  One against unfunded mandates.  Something like this:

&#039;No level of government, federal, state, county, or municipal, may pass a law requiring public monies be appropriated or spent by another level of government.  Any monies required to enact or enforce a law must be appropriated by taxation or fees on individuals or corporations at that level of government only.&#039;

2.  Ban public sector unions, along these lines:

&#039;i.  Any individual or group of individuals or corporation who is engaged in or attempts to engage in labor union activity, labor union organization, or collective bargaining with any entity of government, any public employees, or any civil servants at any level of government, shall be deemed to be attempting treason against the people of the United States, and shall be prosecuted for that crime.  

ii.  Such unions and organizations which now exist will be deemed null and void one year from the passage of this amendment, and members of said unions and organizations will be exempt for treason prosecution for that time period.  Any monies, funds, properties, trusts, or copyrights owned by public sector unions at the time of passage of this amendment are to be dissolved and distributed equitably and lawfully by the unions, their membership, their leaders, and their subsidiaries, within one year of the passage of this amendment, with the Supreme Court acting as final arbiter in any disputes regarding the distribution and disposition of those monies, funds, properties, trusts, or copyrights.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of good suggestions here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d add two more.</p>
<p>1.  One against unfunded mandates.  Something like this:</p>
<p>&#8216;No level of government, federal, state, county, or municipal, may pass a law requiring public monies be appropriated or spent by another level of government.  Any monies required to enact or enforce a law must be appropriated by taxation or fees on individuals or corporations at that level of government only.&#8217;</p>
<p>2.  Ban public sector unions, along these lines:</p>
<p>&#8216;i.  Any individual or group of individuals or corporation who is engaged in or attempts to engage in labor union activity, labor union organization, or collective bargaining with any entity of government, any public employees, or any civil servants at any level of government, shall be deemed to be attempting treason against the people of the United States, and shall be prosecuted for that crime.  </p>
<p>ii.  Such unions and organizations which now exist will be deemed null and void one year from the passage of this amendment, and members of said unions and organizations will be exempt for treason prosecution for that time period.  Any monies, funds, properties, trusts, or copyrights owned by public sector unions at the time of passage of this amendment are to be dissolved and distributed equitably and lawfully by the unions, their membership, their leaders, and their subsidiaries, within one year of the passage of this amendment, with the Supreme Court acting as final arbiter in any disputes regarding the distribution and disposition of those monies, funds, properties, trusts, or copyrights.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamquam</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/#comment-48278</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamquam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=3419#comment-48278</guid>
		<description>Under no circumstances shall the judiciary overturn a law enacted by a majority of the people in an election.

Honorable military service shall be a mandatory pre-requisite for election to President, Vice President, Governor and Lieutenant Governor or any elected official who shall stand in the line of succession to these offices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under no circumstances shall the judiciary overturn a law enacted by a majority of the people in an election.</p>
<p>Honorable military service shall be a mandatory pre-requisite for election to President, Vice President, Governor and Lieutenant Governor or any elected official who shall stand in the line of succession to these offices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy larsen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/04/22/one-more-day/#comment-48205</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=3419#comment-48205</guid>
		<description>Cannoneer/50; --and yet for a few feet of elevation, Lee&#039;s 100 gun two-hour preparation for Pickett&#039;s Charge would not have carried harmlessly over the Union entrenchment on the ridge line, and perhaps the Charge would&#039;ve carried the ridge, and the battle won, and Europe in with the South, and the nation split in two. Another one of those tiny twitches in the hand-of-destiny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannoneer/50; &#8211;and yet for a few feet of elevation, Lee&#8217;s 100 gun two-hour preparation for Pickett&#8217;s Charge would not have carried harmlessly over the Union entrenchment on the ridge line, and perhaps the Charge would&#8217;ve carried the ridge, and the battle won, and Europe in with the South, and the nation split in two. Another one of those tiny twitches in the hand-of-destiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

