<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which way did he go, George?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/#comment-38599</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=2473#comment-38599</guid>
		<description>Milton #96 re. Africa:  I&#039;ve heard the same thing about growth prospects in Africa from informed sources.  

Leo Linbeck III: Smell the glove on that one! Eleven! You really must set up a site for your collected postings, limericks, and sonnets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Milton #96 re. Africa:  I&#8217;ve heard the same thing about growth prospects in Africa from informed sources.  </p>
<p>Leo Linbeck III: Smell the glove on that one! Eleven! You really must set up a site for your collected postings, limericks, and sonnets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Linbeck III</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/#comment-38595</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Linbeck III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=2473#comment-38595</guid>
		<description>The self-absorbed band of G7
Thought that debt was the stairway to heaven

They lived in denial
So kept turning the dial

Because this one, it goes to eleven.

------

L3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The self-absorbed band of G7<br />
Thought that debt was the stairway to heaven</p>
<p>They lived in denial<br />
So kept turning the dial</p>
<p>Because this one, it goes to eleven.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>L3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/#comment-38593</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=2473#comment-38593</guid>
		<description>I would like someone to explain what happen on September 15, 2008. Who and/or what caused the run on the money markets.   I was told that a CIO at a large Internet company that what he saw that day terrified him. What was it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like someone to explain what happen on September 15, 2008. Who and/or what caused the run on the money markets.   I was told that a CIO at a large Internet company that what he saw that day terrified him. What was it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milton</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/#comment-38590</link>
		<dc:creator>milton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=2473#comment-38590</guid>
		<description>Old tricks can still work, go back to where it all began, Africa. I have been watching and analysing the perfomance of various financial institution especially in East Africa and to my suprise, they are growing intern of capitalization and product innovation. I am not sure at the moment whether there is a linear relationship between the global financial crisis and African corporate sector. It might be inversly proportion or some one has to prove otherwise.
Financial result for the year 2008 of some corporate has been market with positive profit especially the banking sector and this what makes me make this hypothesis.
Every thing looks set as a future opportunity to invest in future, Infastructure, Agriculture, Health care the list is endless. Africa is not an emerging market it is an investment Zone with returns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old tricks can still work, go back to where it all began, Africa. I have been watching and analysing the perfomance of various financial institution especially in East Africa and to my suprise, they are growing intern of capitalization and product innovation. I am not sure at the moment whether there is a linear relationship between the global financial crisis and African corporate sector. It might be inversly proportion or some one has to prove otherwise.<br />
Financial result for the year 2008 of some corporate has been market with positive profit especially the banking sector and this what makes me make this hypothesis.<br />
Every thing looks set as a future opportunity to invest in future, Infastructure, Agriculture, Health care the list is endless. Africa is not an emerging market it is an investment Zone with returns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy larsen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/#comment-38587</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=2473#comment-38587</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://in.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idINN0454844120090304&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yep, they&#039;re not reading the papers again.&lt;/a&gt; this bunch is so carter-like, it&#039;s a herpes simplex in the body politik.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idINN0454844120090304" rel="nofollow">Yep, they&#8217;re not reading the papers again.</a> this bunch is so carter-like, it&#8217;s a herpes simplex in the body politik.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy larsen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/#comment-38585</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=2473#comment-38585</guid>
		<description>&quot;Spread the wealth&quot; is what what upward mobility will do --unless gov&#039;t policy blocks free enterprise.  

The statistical poor skew young. Young people, since building wealth takes time, are going to be poor. 

Transfer payments won&#039;t spread wealth anyway --they spread consumption. What spreads wealth is investment in for-profit production of goods &amp; services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Spread the wealth&#8221; is what what upward mobility will do &#8211;unless gov&#8217;t policy blocks free enterprise.  </p>
<p>The statistical poor skew young. Young people, since building wealth takes time, are going to be poor. </p>
<p>Transfer payments won&#8217;t spread wealth anyway &#8211;they spread consumption. What spreads wealth is investment in for-profit production of goods &amp; services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldNeocon</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/#comment-38581</link>
		<dc:creator>OldNeocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=2473#comment-38581</guid>
		<description>It is worse than we think.

Fewer young people every year are conservative.  That means conservatism is closer to dying out every year.  We cannot win this struggle unless conservatism quickly regains a majority.  And stays a majority.  But unless that majority includes a majority of each oncoming cohort of young people, it will be overthrown in just a few more years.  If we are already too late, this is why.  So what can we do?

We have to take back our kids!  They are leftist mostly because of the leftist indoctrination of the government schools.  (Sure, because of the media and entertainment too, but mostly the schools.)

We’ve been trying for 30-odd years to fix that.  We’ve tried running for school boards and changing things from there.  But as soon as we were voted out, it just changed back again.  We even learned not to do it politically, because it can all be lost at the next election – including the next PTA election.  We tried public charter schools.  We tried home schooling.  We tried vouchers.  And these have gone a long way.  But it has not been on a big enough scale.  Neither has it had staying power.

The best answer I see is church-based schools.  Churches, first and foremost, are not the government!  There are about 350,000 of them, scattered all over.  They have staying power.  Churches last a long time, even through many changes of members and staff. They have facilities that are mostly unused during weekdays.  Also, most churches are hard to control from above and hard to take over.  Besides, motivating them to each have a school is not terribly hard.  They just need the money.

It is an option that can start quickly, given the right motivation.  This year!  Many kids could be pulled from the government schools THIS YEAR and put into hastily-started church-based Christian schools.  There is so much fine curriculum out there, so many great models!  No re-inventing the wheel here.  

If we could ever get about half of all our kids into church-based schools, using scholarships for poor kids, the country would change permanently like you would not believe!  In about 15 years, big time!

We should not be surprised.  The Founders said that our new constitution and nation would work “only for a religious and moral people.”  Doh.  Such people make up the great base of the conservative movement.  The bigger that group gets, the more democracy and public common decency we have.  The smaller it gets, the less.  

Unless it gets bigger, and stays bigger, we are lost.  Oh, we might win a bit here and there, for awhile.  But we couldn’t keep it.

We conservatives look back to the Constitution, as we ought.  But we have forgotten about its essential foundation on the Judeo-Christian tradition, massively followed by the population of that time.  

Without it, we have been skating on thin ice.  It had to start cracking sometime.   

(See Niall Ferguson’s thoughts on this, even though he is a “materialist.” At http://www.gerrycharlottephelps.com/2005/07/christianize_fa.html.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is worse than we think.</p>
<p>Fewer young people every year are conservative.  That means conservatism is closer to dying out every year.  We cannot win this struggle unless conservatism quickly regains a majority.  And stays a majority.  But unless that majority includes a majority of each oncoming cohort of young people, it will be overthrown in just a few more years.  If we are already too late, this is why.  So what can we do?</p>
<p>We have to take back our kids!  They are leftist mostly because of the leftist indoctrination of the government schools.  (Sure, because of the media and entertainment too, but mostly the schools.)</p>
<p>We’ve been trying for 30-odd years to fix that.  We’ve tried running for school boards and changing things from there.  But as soon as we were voted out, it just changed back again.  We even learned not to do it politically, because it can all be lost at the next election – including the next PTA election.  We tried public charter schools.  We tried home schooling.  We tried vouchers.  And these have gone a long way.  But it has not been on a big enough scale.  Neither has it had staying power.</p>
<p>The best answer I see is church-based schools.  Churches, first and foremost, are not the government!  There are about 350,000 of them, scattered all over.  They have staying power.  Churches last a long time, even through many changes of members and staff. They have facilities that are mostly unused during weekdays.  Also, most churches are hard to control from above and hard to take over.  Besides, motivating them to each have a school is not terribly hard.  They just need the money.</p>
<p>It is an option that can start quickly, given the right motivation.  This year!  Many kids could be pulled from the government schools THIS YEAR and put into hastily-started church-based Christian schools.  There is so much fine curriculum out there, so many great models!  No re-inventing the wheel here.  </p>
<p>If we could ever get about half of all our kids into church-based schools, using scholarships for poor kids, the country would change permanently like you would not believe!  In about 15 years, big time!</p>
<p>We should not be surprised.  The Founders said that our new constitution and nation would work “only for a religious and moral people.”  Doh.  Such people make up the great base of the conservative movement.  The bigger that group gets, the more democracy and public common decency we have.  The smaller it gets, the less.  </p>
<p>Unless it gets bigger, and stays bigger, we are lost.  Oh, we might win a bit here and there, for awhile.  But we couldn’t keep it.</p>
<p>We conservatives look back to the Constitution, as we ought.  But we have forgotten about its essential foundation on the Judeo-Christian tradition, massively followed by the population of that time.  </p>
<p>Without it, we have been skating on thin ice.  It had to start cracking sometime.   </p>
<p>(See Niall Ferguson’s thoughts on this, even though he is a “materialist.” At <a href="http://www.gerrycharlottephelps.com/2005/07/christianize_fa.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gerrycharlottephelps.com/2005/07/christianize_fa.html</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/#comment-38574</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=2473#comment-38574</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This only strengthens the argument for shortening the feedback loop in any attempts to “shift out of the current dynamic” because the steps we can rationally take can never drastically exceed our information holdings.&lt;/i&gt;

Shortening the feedback loop (mark to market) is exactly what caused the problem. What is really wanted is more integration: averaging over longer time periods. That damps out oscillation - unless the gain is too high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This only strengthens the argument for shortening the feedback loop in any attempts to “shift out of the current dynamic” because the steps we can rationally take can never drastically exceed our information holdings.</i></p>
<p>Shortening the feedback loop (mark to market) is exactly what caused the problem. What is really wanted is more integration: averaging over longer time periods. That damps out oscillation &#8211; unless the gain is too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pips</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/#comment-38571</link>
		<dc:creator>Pips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=2473#comment-38571</guid>
		<description>The wake up should have happened the day following Sept. 11, 2001 -- the wake up that would bring us to clear sense of ourselves as a nation under physical threat. Clearly the event was not big enough. Thanks to the press even this new alarm clock, come to us in the form of a major financial threat, isn&#039;t big enough either.  It looks like we are going to need some hard core bank FAILURES not bailouts before we are brought to the point of shedding our sheeps clothing.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wake up should have happened the day following Sept. 11, 2001 &#8212; the wake up that would bring us to clear sense of ourselves as a nation under physical threat. Clearly the event was not big enough. Thanks to the press even this new alarm clock, come to us in the form of a major financial threat, isn&#8217;t big enough either.  It looks like we are going to need some hard core bank FAILURES not bailouts before we are brought to the point of shedding our sheeps clothing&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterike</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/03/04/which-way-did-he-go-george/#comment-38570</link>
		<dc:creator>peterike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=2473#comment-38570</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Whether Anthony Kennedy supports liberty or not may determine the future of America. &lt;/i&gt;

Good luck with that one. Can anybody check to see if he&#039;s been on the guest list at all the parties Obama has been throwing? 

I think Kennedy is easily flattered and rolled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Whether Anthony Kennedy supports liberty or not may determine the future of America. </i></p>
<p>Good luck with that one. Can anybody check to see if he&#8217;s been on the guest list at all the parties Obama has been throwing? </p>
<p>I think Kennedy is easily flattered and rolled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

