<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/01/24/rush-to-judgment/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 23:28:57 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Rush to judgment</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Byron York asked Rush Limbaugh to respond to the President&amp;#8217;s remark that Republican politicians ought to quit listening to him and get on with crafting the stimulus plan. Readers can read Limbaugh&amp;#8217;s response themselves.  Both Limbaugh and Obama infer that political motives are shaping the policy debate. Obama by accusing Republican politicians of being cowed by the Limbaugh crowd, and Rush by suggesting that the huge expenditures carry the danger of creating a permanently expanded &amp;#8212; hence Democratic &amp;#8212; government.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:13:14 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Richard Fernandez]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/richard-fernandez/2009/01/24/rush-to-judgment-n187085</link></item></channel></rss>