<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/#comment-26760</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1462#comment-26760</guid>
		<description>A few years ago, my nephew was doing the trade schooling for carpentry. Our family are tradesmen, and he was following the honorable path of his forbears by starting in a trade after finishing high school.

He was the youngest in the class. Almost everyone else had university degrees or high level training in technology. They either were in a mind-numbingly boring field, or couldn&#039;t get a job in a field where the top 5% are employable, the rest statistics. They were hoping for opportunity working with their hands.

The funniest thing I saw was when I was 2nd year apprentice in my trade. We were doing a job in a place  where everyone had university degrees, very specialized work. One fellow had left his pay stub on his desk. I was making more. I didn&#039;t say anything, I didn&#039;t want to ruin his day.

There is an old joke. A lawyer had a plugged drain, calls a plumber. He shows up, fixes it, and presents the bill. The lawyer says, whew, I&#039;m a lawyer and I can hardly afford this! The plumber says, oh yes, I understand. I felt the same way when I was a lawyer.

Derek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago, my nephew was doing the trade schooling for carpentry. Our family are tradesmen, and he was following the honorable path of his forbears by starting in a trade after finishing high school.</p>
<p>He was the youngest in the class. Almost everyone else had university degrees or high level training in technology. They either were in a mind-numbingly boring field, or couldn&#8217;t get a job in a field where the top 5% are employable, the rest statistics. They were hoping for opportunity working with their hands.</p>
<p>The funniest thing I saw was when I was 2nd year apprentice in my trade. We were doing a job in a place  where everyone had university degrees, very specialized work. One fellow had left his pay stub on his desk. I was making more. I didn&#8217;t say anything, I didn&#8217;t want to ruin his day.</p>
<p>There is an old joke. A lawyer had a plugged drain, calls a plumber. He shows up, fixes it, and presents the bill. The lawyer says, whew, I&#8217;m a lawyer and I can hardly afford this! The plumber says, oh yes, I understand. I felt the same way when I was a lawyer.</p>
<p>Derek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakespeare's Debtor</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/#comment-26758</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakespeare's Debtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1462#comment-26758</guid>
		<description>&quot;It is already possible to imagine a society in which the majority of the population, that is to say, its laborers, will have almost as much leisure as in earlier times was enjoyed by the aristocracy. When one recalls how aristocracies in the past actually behaved, the prospect is not cheerful.&quot;

W. H. Auden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is already possible to imagine a society in which the majority of the population, that is to say, its laborers, will have almost as much leisure as in earlier times was enjoyed by the aristocracy. When one recalls how aristocracies in the past actually behaved, the prospect is not cheerful.&#8221;</p>
<p>W. H. Auden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storm-Rider</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/#comment-26619</link>
		<dc:creator>Storm-Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1462#comment-26619</guid>
		<description>There is a relationship between intellectuals and statist tyranny - both Marxist and Fascist. Tyrants rely on the support of intellectuals to supply a rhetorical veneer of state legitimacy, where the intellectuals rely on the financial support of a powerful state - one capable of redistribution of income in their favor.

&quot;The question is what kind of ideas is favoured by the intellectuals. The question is whether the intellectuals are neutral in their choice of ideas with which they are ready to deal with. Hayek argued that they are not. They do not hold or try to spread all kinds of ideas. They have very clear and, in some respect, very understandable preferences for some of them. They prefer ideas, which give them jobs and income and which enhance their power and prestige. They, therefore, look for ideas with specific characteristics. They look for ideas, which enhance the role of the state because the state is usually their main employer, sponsor or donator. That is not all. According to Hayek “the power of ideas grows in proportion to their generality, abstractness, and even vagueness”. Hence it is not surprising that the intellectuals are mostly interested in abstract, not directly implementable ideas. This is also the way of thinking, in which they have comparative advantage. They are not good at details. They do not have ambitions to solve a problem. They are not interested in dealing with the everyday’s affairs of common citizens. Hayek put it clearly: “the intellectual, by his whole disposition, is uninterested in technical details or practical difficulties.” He is interested in visions and utopias and because “socialist thought owes its appeal largely to its visionary character” (and I would add lack of realism and utopian nature), the intellectual tends to become a socialist...&quot;  President of the Czeck Republic, Václav Klaus

http://www.klaus.cz/klaus2/asp/clanek.asp?id=wFYl3mgsTzI6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a relationship between intellectuals and statist tyranny &#8211; both Marxist and Fascist. Tyrants rely on the support of intellectuals to supply a rhetorical veneer of state legitimacy, where the intellectuals rely on the financial support of a powerful state &#8211; one capable of redistribution of income in their favor.</p>
<p>&#8220;The question is what kind of ideas is favoured by the intellectuals. The question is whether the intellectuals are neutral in their choice of ideas with which they are ready to deal with. Hayek argued that they are not. They do not hold or try to spread all kinds of ideas. They have very clear and, in some respect, very understandable preferences for some of them. They prefer ideas, which give them jobs and income and which enhance their power and prestige. They, therefore, look for ideas with specific characteristics. They look for ideas, which enhance the role of the state because the state is usually their main employer, sponsor or donator. That is not all. According to Hayek “the power of ideas grows in proportion to their generality, abstractness, and even vagueness”. Hence it is not surprising that the intellectuals are mostly interested in abstract, not directly implementable ideas. This is also the way of thinking, in which they have comparative advantage. They are not good at details. They do not have ambitions to solve a problem. They are not interested in dealing with the everyday’s affairs of common citizens. Hayek put it clearly: “the intellectual, by his whole disposition, is uninterested in technical details or practical difficulties.” He is interested in visions and utopias and because “socialist thought owes its appeal largely to its visionary character” (and I would add lack of realism and utopian nature), the intellectual tends to become a socialist&#8230;&#8221;  President of the Czeck Republic, Václav Klaus</p>
<p><a href="http://www.klaus.cz/klaus2/asp/clanek.asp?id=wFYl3mgsTzI6" rel="nofollow">http://www.klaus.cz/klaus2/asp/clanek.asp?id=wFYl3mgsTzI6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Nigma</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/#comment-26613</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Nigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1462#comment-26613</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it funny how the most elaborate intellectual rationalizations are created to capture people in the most vile forms of tyranny (Arbeit Macht Frei! at the gates of the death camps in the 3rd Reich)? It&#039;s almost as if the intellectuals know about the man behind the curtain who holds the real levers of power, yet cannot quite bring themselves to acknowledge the reality of it. That they too have made themselves into puppets on a string. 
Almost.
Those were the competing ideologies of the 20th century after the collapse of the &#039;Old World Order&#039; at the end of the Great War, the War to end all Wars.  Another misnomer, as it has created the basis for the unenending class and culture war, that will undoubtedly continue after all of us are dead and buried. It could more accurately be  named &#039;The Beginning of the Endless War&#039;.
Where we are now, in the twilight, between the shadows and the light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it funny how the most elaborate intellectual rationalizations are created to capture people in the most vile forms of tyranny (Arbeit Macht Frei! at the gates of the death camps in the 3rd Reich)? It&#8217;s almost as if the intellectuals know about the man behind the curtain who holds the real levers of power, yet cannot quite bring themselves to acknowledge the reality of it. That they too have made themselves into puppets on a string.<br />
Almost.<br />
Those were the competing ideologies of the 20th century after the collapse of the &#8216;Old World Order&#8217; at the end of the Great War, the War to end all Wars.  Another misnomer, as it has created the basis for the unenending class and culture war, that will undoubtedly continue after all of us are dead and buried. It could more accurately be  named &#8216;The Beginning of the Endless War&#8217;.<br />
Where we are now, in the twilight, between the shadows and the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storm-Rider</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/#comment-26609</link>
		<dc:creator>Storm-Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1462#comment-26609</guid>
		<description>Contrast the wisdom of our founding fathers with the tyrannical European philosophy of Karl Marx, who along with the French revolutionaries, were the originators of government enforced economic equality through redistribution - this they call &quot;social justice&quot; and is only enforceable through totalitarian government power. Karl Marx in effect declared that you do not have a right (and certainly not a God-given right) to personal property creatively obtained, and the happiness that follows.

“In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your property. Precisely so; that is just what we intend.”  Karl Marx

“You must, therefore, confess that by &quot;individual&quot; you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible.”  Karl Marx


“In short, the Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things. In all these movements, they bring to the front, as the leading question in each, the property question, no matter what its degree of development at the time.”   Karl Marx

“The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the state… Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property”   Karl Marx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contrast the wisdom of our founding fathers with the tyrannical European philosophy of Karl Marx, who along with the French revolutionaries, were the originators of government enforced economic equality through redistribution &#8211; this they call &#8220;social justice&#8221; and is only enforceable through totalitarian government power. Karl Marx in effect declared that you do not have a right (and certainly not a God-given right) to personal property creatively obtained, and the happiness that follows.</p>
<p>“In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your property. Precisely so; that is just what we intend.”  Karl Marx</p>
<p>“You must, therefore, confess that by &#8220;individual&#8221; you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible.”  Karl Marx</p>
<p>“In short, the Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things. In all these movements, they bring to the front, as the leading question in each, the property question, no matter what its degree of development at the time.”   Karl Marx</p>
<p>“The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the state… Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property”   Karl Marx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storm-Rider</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/#comment-26607</link>
		<dc:creator>Storm-Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1462#comment-26607</guid>
		<description>Work comes in two varieties, creative and slavish. Creative work, along with human love and human liberty, leads to human happiness; whereas slavery stands in the way of happiness.

Our founding fathers declared that all men have a God-given human right to the pursuit of happiness; this could be re-stated as a God-given or sacred right to human creativity and the property that accrues from creative work. Excessive taxation of human labor, by degree, leads to slavery; and this was declared unjust and tyrannical by our founders.

“The personal right to acquire property, which is a natural right, gives to property, when acquired, a right to protection, as a social right.”  James Madison

“The rights of persons, and the rights of property, are the objects, for the protection of which Government was instituted.”  James Madison

“Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.”  James Madison

“Property is surely a right of mankind as real as liberty.”  John Adams

&quot;Property must be secured, or liberty cannot exist.&quot;    John Adams

&quot;Now what liberty can there be where property is taken without consent?&quot;    Samuel Adams

“Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can.”  Samuel Adams

&quot;In a free government almost all other rights would become worthless if the government possessed power over the private fortune of every citizen.”    Chief Justice John Marshall

“Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases.”  Thomas Jefferson

“The true foundation of republican government is the equal right of every citizen in his person and property and in their management.”   Thomas Jefferson

“Take not from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned.”  Thomas Jefferson

“The Constitution of most of our states, and of the United States, assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed and that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of press.”  Thomas Jefferson

&quot;Property is the fruit of labor...property is desirable...is a positive good in the world. That some should be rich shows that others may become rich, and hence is just encouragement to industry and enterprise. Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another; but let him labor diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence when built.&quot;  Abraham Lincoln</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work comes in two varieties, creative and slavish. Creative work, along with human love and human liberty, leads to human happiness; whereas slavery stands in the way of happiness.</p>
<p>Our founding fathers declared that all men have a God-given human right to the pursuit of happiness; this could be re-stated as a God-given or sacred right to human creativity and the property that accrues from creative work. Excessive taxation of human labor, by degree, leads to slavery; and this was declared unjust and tyrannical by our founders.</p>
<p>“The personal right to acquire property, which is a natural right, gives to property, when acquired, a right to protection, as a social right.”  James Madison</p>
<p>“The rights of persons, and the rights of property, are the objects, for the protection of which Government was instituted.”  James Madison</p>
<p>“Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.”  James Madison</p>
<p>“Property is surely a right of mankind as real as liberty.”  John Adams</p>
<p>&#8220;Property must be secured, or liberty cannot exist.&#8221;    John Adams</p>
<p>&#8220;Now what liberty can there be where property is taken without consent?&#8221;    Samuel Adams</p>
<p>“Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can.”  Samuel Adams</p>
<p>&#8220;In a free government almost all other rights would become worthless if the government possessed power over the private fortune of every citizen.”    Chief Justice John Marshall</p>
<p>“Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have &#8230; The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases.”  Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>“The true foundation of republican government is the equal right of every citizen in his person and property and in their management.”   Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>“Take not from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned.”  Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>“The Constitution of most of our states, and of the United States, assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed and that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of press.”  Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>&#8220;Property is the fruit of labor&#8230;property is desirable&#8230;is a positive good in the world. That some should be rich shows that others may become rich, and hence is just encouragement to industry and enterprise. Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another; but let him labor diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence when built.&#8221;  Abraham Lincoln</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wretchard</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/#comment-26606</link>
		<dc:creator>wretchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1462#comment-26606</guid>
		<description>Imagine being able to ask animals and plants if they worked. It&#039;s possible they would not be able to distinguish survival activities -- Russell&#039;s work -- from living. But for some men at least, a shadow has fallen between work and life. Life becomes what happens between Friday afternoon and Monday morning. To explain this, some Marxists have proposed that man&#039;s work has been stolen or &#039;alienated&#039; from him. By giving it back to him he will be restored to wholeness.

Ironically, the way Marxists think work can be given back to man is making him an employee in some vast, soulless state apparatus which will be perpetually enlarged at the cost of the entrepreneur, self-employed professional and tradesman. Yet common experience will suggest that they are achieving quite the opposite: that the Marxist world where all the means of production are owned by the state is in fact the ultimate in slavery while the world that they in fact destroy -- where men are freer agents seeking out opportunity according to preference and conditions -- is ironically the world of comparative freedom.

The other irony is that when modern man seeks freedom, he doesn&#039;t seek Russell&#039;s world of cultured leisure. Who doesn&#039;t know the lyrics to Woodstock?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, I came upon a child of God
He was walking along the road
And I asked him, tell me, where are you going
This he told me:

Said, I&#039;m going down to Yasgur&#039;s farm
Gonna join in a rock and roll band
Got to get back to the land
And set my soul free&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Back to the land. Back to the garden. A return to nature. A journey back, in a word, to our animal roots, where all of the time is spent in survival activities. How strange it is that the Aqe of Aquarius should look to the Age of Stone for its vision of freedom. What beckons them to it? Work in the precise form that Russell denounced it. Maybe they won&#039;t want it any more, once they know what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine being able to ask animals and plants if they worked. It&#8217;s possible they would not be able to distinguish survival activities &#8212; Russell&#8217;s work &#8212; from living. But for some men at least, a shadow has fallen between work and life. Life becomes what happens between Friday afternoon and Monday morning. To explain this, some Marxists have proposed that man&#8217;s work has been stolen or &#8216;alienated&#8217; from him. By giving it back to him he will be restored to wholeness.</p>
<p>Ironically, the way Marxists think work can be given back to man is making him an employee in some vast, soulless state apparatus which will be perpetually enlarged at the cost of the entrepreneur, self-employed professional and tradesman. Yet common experience will suggest that they are achieving quite the opposite: that the Marxist world where all the means of production are owned by the state is in fact the ultimate in slavery while the world that they in fact destroy &#8212; where men are freer agents seeking out opportunity according to preference and conditions &#8212; is ironically the world of comparative freedom.</p>
<p>The other irony is that when modern man seeks freedom, he doesn&#8217;t seek Russell&#8217;s world of cultured leisure. Who doesn&#8217;t know the lyrics to Woodstock?</p>
<blockquote><p>Well, I came upon a child of God<br />
He was walking along the road<br />
And I asked him, tell me, where are you going<br />
This he told me:</p>
<p>Said, I&#8217;m going down to Yasgur&#8217;s farm<br />
Gonna join in a rock and roll band<br />
Got to get back to the land<br />
And set my soul free</p></blockquote>
<p>Back to the land. Back to the garden. A return to nature. A journey back, in a word, to our animal roots, where all of the time is spent in survival activities. How strange it is that the Aqe of Aquarius should look to the Age of Stone for its vision of freedom. What beckons them to it? Work in the precise form that Russell denounced it. Maybe they won&#8217;t want it any more, once they know what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WPZ</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/#comment-26602</link>
		<dc:creator>WPZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1462#comment-26602</guid>
		<description>I shall ask for a moment of indulgence to poke around in the span of my working experience.
Starting out life as someone who wanted to view himself as intellectual, and even artistic, I thought that my life work would be as a photographer.  To pay the bills in that not-so-remunerative line of work, I took a summer job as a carpenter&#039;s helper.
Nearly 37 years later, I still lug around a tool belt and think about wood, nearly all the time.  I of course don&#039;t do some of the more basic or physical stuff I once did, and do more supervising and teaching now in my later years than plain old nail-slugging, but I had a bit of time a couple of weeks ago, dug out some leftover framing material buried in one of the vans, and constructed a rather nice entrance canopy on the front of our house.  
I still marvel at how much I threw myself into it, and how much time I&#039;ve spent (blush) admiring it, even though I have plans to gussy it up and make it prettier.
Here&#039;s the point, though: Nothing I&#039;ve done in the last few months comes close to the sheer pleasure building that porch roof gave, nor brought on such feelings of satisfaction.
That I perhaps was born with a predilection for building things certainly is a factor, nor would I ever suggest that anyone not given the opportunity to build structures is somehow lacking- my wife is a gerontologist and couldn&#039;t run a Skilsaw to save her life, but she works harder than anyone else and gets the same results from working hard at what she does as her tradesman husband.
In my early twenties, as a rabid motorcyclist I grabbed Robert Pirsig&#039;s bizarre &quot;Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance&quot; thinking I was getting a book about my favorite mode of transportation.
It wasn&#039;t- it&#039;s about the search for &quot;quality&quot;.  But at no point does Pirsig&#039;s search travel far from work as the basis of human existence.
This exposition came to me early in my trade career, perhaps four years in, but shook me all the way to the foundation: here was why I was so engaged with, and enthused by, my workaday work.
I&#039;ve never stopped telling folks that I want to be a writer when I grow up (that may be obvious), but as long as I can still get up a ladder and pick up a Skilsaw, I hope that I&#039;ll still find opportunities to do work.
It&#039;s the only time I feel right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shall ask for a moment of indulgence to poke around in the span of my working experience.<br />
Starting out life as someone who wanted to view himself as intellectual, and even artistic, I thought that my life work would be as a photographer.  To pay the bills in that not-so-remunerative line of work, I took a summer job as a carpenter&#8217;s helper.<br />
Nearly 37 years later, I still lug around a tool belt and think about wood, nearly all the time.  I of course don&#8217;t do some of the more basic or physical stuff I once did, and do more supervising and teaching now in my later years than plain old nail-slugging, but I had a bit of time a couple of weeks ago, dug out some leftover framing material buried in one of the vans, and constructed a rather nice entrance canopy on the front of our house.<br />
I still marvel at how much I threw myself into it, and how much time I&#8217;ve spent (blush) admiring it, even though I have plans to gussy it up and make it prettier.<br />
Here&#8217;s the point, though: Nothing I&#8217;ve done in the last few months comes close to the sheer pleasure building that porch roof gave, nor brought on such feelings of satisfaction.<br />
That I perhaps was born with a predilection for building things certainly is a factor, nor would I ever suggest that anyone not given the opportunity to build structures is somehow lacking- my wife is a gerontologist and couldn&#8217;t run a Skilsaw to save her life, but she works harder than anyone else and gets the same results from working hard at what she does as her tradesman husband.<br />
In my early twenties, as a rabid motorcyclist I grabbed Robert Pirsig&#8217;s bizarre &#8220;Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance&#8221; thinking I was getting a book about my favorite mode of transportation.<br />
It wasn&#8217;t- it&#8217;s about the search for &#8220;quality&#8221;.  But at no point does Pirsig&#8217;s search travel far from work as the basis of human existence.<br />
This exposition came to me early in my trade career, perhaps four years in, but shook me all the way to the foundation: here was why I was so engaged with, and enthused by, my workaday work.<br />
I&#8217;ve never stopped telling folks that I want to be a writer when I grow up (that may be obvious), but as long as I can still get up a ladder and pick up a Skilsaw, I hope that I&#8217;ll still find opportunities to do work.<br />
It&#8217;s the only time I feel right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Nigma</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/#comment-26598</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Nigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1462#comment-26598</guid>
		<description>Well, the people that invent technological advances (Edison-&quot;Invention is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration&quot;) are obsessive workaholics, and happy to be so.
But the people that PROMOTE and make it popular are the ones who are lazy. The last century-plus has seen an incredible amount of labor reduction and time-saving technological advances in American society; from the change to diesel from steam powered trains, commercial air travel, washers and dryers (ever used a wringer washer?), and on and on.
But have any of these technological wonders improved our ethical or moral outlook? No, probably not. Some aspects of these advances have made us wealthier (no doubt) and given us more time for charity and benevolence, but it has not cured us of the collectivist urge, or enabled people to have a more moral life ( I give you instant pron to be downloaded via the Internet. Voila!).
It reminds me of the melancholy phrase by Tolkien in describing the Numenoreans of the 2nd age: &quot;though their wealth increased, their joy departed&quot;, based on their estrangement from the Elder race (elves).
We are indeed well and truly estranged from the philosophical roots of our Republic, and there is for sure no going back. What lies ahead, who can guess, for we are surely traveling blind into the Undiscovered Country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the people that invent technological advances (Edison-&#8221;Invention is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration&#8221;) are obsessive workaholics, and happy to be so.<br />
But the people that PROMOTE and make it popular are the ones who are lazy. The last century-plus has seen an incredible amount of labor reduction and time-saving technological advances in American society; from the change to diesel from steam powered trains, commercial air travel, washers and dryers (ever used a wringer washer?), and on and on.<br />
But have any of these technological wonders improved our ethical or moral outlook? No, probably not. Some aspects of these advances have made us wealthier (no doubt) and given us more time for charity and benevolence, but it has not cured us of the collectivist urge, or enabled people to have a more moral life ( I give you instant pron to be downloaded via the Internet. Voila!).<br />
It reminds me of the melancholy phrase by Tolkien in describing the Numenoreans of the 2nd age: &#8220;though their wealth increased, their joy departed&#8221;, based on their estrangement from the Elder race (elves).<br />
We are indeed well and truly estranged from the philosophical roots of our Republic, and there is for sure no going back. What lies ahead, who can guess, for we are surely traveling blind into the Undiscovered Country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RWE</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/12/16/hard-work/#comment-26593</link>
		<dc:creator>RWE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1462#comment-26593</guid>
		<description>Staring:  Yeah, I was thinking that if I could get that guy on the Sullivan show I could retire as a millionaire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staring:  Yeah, I was thinking that if I could get that guy on the Sullivan show I could retire as a millionaire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

