<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s on TV!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFSanders</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/#comment-24029</link>
		<dc:creator>JFSanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1171#comment-24029</guid>
		<description>@Cascajun #29,

 I agree with you. The only way to be sure about ridding yourself of a cancer is to irradiate it and then treat what is left with very strong chemicals. I suggest we apply the appropriate protocols to our cancer as soon as possible. Wink and nod...

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cascajun #29,</p>
<p> I agree with you. The only way to be sure about ridding yourself of a cancer is to irradiate it and then treat what is left with very strong chemicals. I suggest we apply the appropriate protocols to our cancer as soon as possible. Wink and nod&#8230;</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveaz</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/#comment-24012</link>
		<dc:creator>steveaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1171#comment-24012</guid>
		<description>Wretchard, you wise old bird,  
We&#039;ve come full circle now, haven&#039;t we?  

Now it&#039;s India&#039;s &quot;chickens&quot; that&#039;re comin&#039; home to roost!  Hindu India is the &quot;White Satan,&quot; and the democratically elected government in New Delhi needs to consider the &quot;root causes&quot; of the attacks on Indian civilians in Mumbai.

How convenient...and how coincidental?

Now that the American Mustang has (apparently) accepted Xerxes&#039; bit in its mouth, Washington DC may have been removed from the immediate-attack list.  And the Jihad has decided to refocus its fear-mongerinig on the caliphate&#039;s &lt;i&gt;other&lt;/i&gt; obstruction in central Asia.

If they&#039;re smart, the Jihadis&#039;ll see fit to give our Kenyan President-elect some room to work.  They should know the game by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wretchard, you wise old bird,<br />
We&#8217;ve come full circle now, haven&#8217;t we?  </p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s India&#8217;s &#8220;chickens&#8221; that&#8217;re comin&#8217; home to roost!  Hindu India is the &#8220;White Satan,&#8221; and the democratically elected government in New Delhi needs to consider the &#8220;root causes&#8221; of the attacks on Indian civilians in Mumbai.</p>
<p>How convenient&#8230;and how coincidental?</p>
<p>Now that the American Mustang has (apparently) accepted Xerxes&#8217; bit in its mouth, Washington DC may have been removed from the immediate-attack list.  And the Jihad has decided to refocus its fear-mongerinig on the caliphate&#8217;s <i>other</i> obstruction in central Asia.</p>
<p>If they&#8217;re smart, the Jihadis&#8217;ll see fit to give our Kenyan President-elect some room to work.  They should know the game by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew X</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/#comment-23981</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1171#comment-23981</guid>
		<description>Ruby, your problem and why no one is listening to you goes back to one line in your first post: &quot;defined by a President who got the member list straight from Jesus.&quot;

One can argue for or against Mr. Bush&#039;s decisions, but when you say that line, you define yourself as someone who has utterly nothing whatosever to add to the conversation that could possibly matter.

Yet so many are unable to offer cogent arguments without such drool slipping through the logic mechanisms and dropping onto the floor like excrement.

Try arguing against Mr. Bush and lose the pathetic nitwtted &quot;straight from Jesus&quot; crap, and maybe people who matter will listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruby, your problem and why no one is listening to you goes back to one line in your first post: &#8220;defined by a President who got the member list straight from Jesus.&#8221;</p>
<p>One can argue for or against Mr. Bush&#8217;s decisions, but when you say that line, you define yourself as someone who has utterly nothing whatosever to add to the conversation that could possibly matter.</p>
<p>Yet so many are unable to offer cogent arguments without such drool slipping through the logic mechanisms and dropping onto the floor like excrement.</p>
<p>Try arguing against Mr. Bush and lose the pathetic nitwtted &#8220;straight from Jesus&#8221; crap, and maybe people who matter will listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterike</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/#comment-23979</link>
		<dc:creator>peterike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1171#comment-23979</guid>
		<description>Wow, it&#039;s been ages since anyone brought up Joe &quot;Bag of Wind&quot; Wilson and his famous glamourpuss wife, Secret Squirrel. Thank you for reminding me, Ruby Red, that traitors live always amongst us. No doubt you are of the ilk that considerous treasonous behavior the highest form of honor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it&#8217;s been ages since anyone brought up Joe &#8220;Bag of Wind&#8221; Wilson and his famous glamourpuss wife, Secret Squirrel. Thank you for reminding me, Ruby Red, that traitors live always amongst us. No doubt you are of the ilk that considerous treasonous behavior the highest form of honor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumcrook</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/#comment-23975</link>
		<dc:creator>rumcrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1171#comment-23975</guid>
		<description>we live now in an era of soviet style history, meaning re-write anything you dont like and ignore or quash what you cant.

propaganda and lies are not history ruby red. thats what you spread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we live now in an era of soviet style history, meaning re-write anything you dont like and ignore or quash what you cant.</p>
<p>propaganda and lies are not history ruby red. thats what you spread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby Red</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/#comment-23969</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1171#comment-23969</guid>
		<description>Rumcrook said, &#039;saddam hosted al queda operatives in iraq. he promoted and allowed terrorist training camps to function in iraq. was he responsible for 911? in as far as he gave support to terrorist orgs and al queda, than yes and so you cannot say “absolutely”&#039;

&lt;i&gt;Cheney told the CIA (on White House stationary no less!) to forge an Iraqi document proving that Saddam Hussein was developing nukes and collaborating with al-Qaeda. 

The bogus memo said Mohammed Atta was trained in Baghdad and also talked about a Yellowcake shipment from Niger.  JC Wilson called bolshevik on that, and they &quot;outed&quot; his wife Valerie in retaliation.  I know all this is ancient, sordid history but we don&#039;t forget.  The only ones who still go around saying there was a link between Saddam and 911 is World Net Daily and the Elephant Bar.  And this place.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumcrook said, &#8216;saddam hosted al queda operatives in iraq. he promoted and allowed terrorist training camps to function in iraq. was he responsible for 911? in as far as he gave support to terrorist orgs and al queda, than yes and so you cannot say “absolutely”&#8217;</p>
<p><i>Cheney told the CIA (on White House stationary no less!) to forge an Iraqi document proving that Saddam Hussein was developing nukes and collaborating with al-Qaeda. </p>
<p>The bogus memo said Mohammed Atta was trained in Baghdad and also talked about a Yellowcake shipment from Niger.  JC Wilson called bolshevik on that, and they &#8220;outed&#8221; his wife Valerie in retaliation.  I know all this is ancient, sordid history but we don&#8217;t forget.  The only ones who still go around saying there was a link between Saddam and 911 is World Net Daily and the Elephant Bar.  And this place.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiskey</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/#comment-23964</link>
		<dc:creator>whiskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1171#comment-23964</guid>
		<description>Wretchard, Hotair has a link where the Pakistani ISI Chief is going to Bombay to assist in the investigation. The Indians are already talking about War.

Obama is seen as a hostile, pro-Jihad, pro-Pakistani President. Unlike GWB. Obama as a matter of record spent a Summer in Pakistan, traveling on an Indonesian passport. It&#039;s doubtful he was there for the girls or the beaches.

That coupled with this terrorist provocation clearly run by the ISI pretty much guarantees War. India and it&#039;s people don&#039;t CARE what the international community does, and indeed India needs a short, sharp, quick resolution so that outsourcing and tourism can return.

They need a &quot;resolution&quot; of the problem, which means really a complete and total defeat of the Pakistani people and ethnic/religious cleansing of Muslims inside India. Notice I said people not government. India cannot afford in a global downturn the drip-drip-drip effect of attack after attack destroying their outsourcing advantage in the climb out of poverty. At the very least that creates poor people who had only recently climbed out of poverty -- a classic pre-revolutionary condition pols are well aware of.

What would defeat of the Pakistani people look like? Killing about 50% of the people I think, which means essentially a first-strike of Nuclear Weapons. Against major Pakistani military installations and nukes AND cities. 

The only thing stopping that IMHO is a Pakistani surrender of some convenient ISI people and various cut-outs, either LeT or AQ or whoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wretchard, Hotair has a link where the Pakistani ISI Chief is going to Bombay to assist in the investigation. The Indians are already talking about War.</p>
<p>Obama is seen as a hostile, pro-Jihad, pro-Pakistani President. Unlike GWB. Obama as a matter of record spent a Summer in Pakistan, traveling on an Indonesian passport. It&#8217;s doubtful he was there for the girls or the beaches.</p>
<p>That coupled with this terrorist provocation clearly run by the ISI pretty much guarantees War. India and it&#8217;s people don&#8217;t CARE what the international community does, and indeed India needs a short, sharp, quick resolution so that outsourcing and tourism can return.</p>
<p>They need a &#8220;resolution&#8221; of the problem, which means really a complete and total defeat of the Pakistani people and ethnic/religious cleansing of Muslims inside India. Notice I said people not government. India cannot afford in a global downturn the drip-drip-drip effect of attack after attack destroying their outsourcing advantage in the climb out of poverty. At the very least that creates poor people who had only recently climbed out of poverty &#8212; a classic pre-revolutionary condition pols are well aware of.</p>
<p>What would defeat of the Pakistani people look like? Killing about 50% of the people I think, which means essentially a first-strike of Nuclear Weapons. Against major Pakistani military installations and nukes AND cities. </p>
<p>The only thing stopping that IMHO is a Pakistani surrender of some convenient ISI people and various cut-outs, either LeT or AQ or whoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumcrook</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/#comment-23963</link>
		<dc:creator>rumcrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1171#comment-23963</guid>
		<description>this page contains links and commentary on saddams connection thru his security and intel agencies to al queda and specifically individuals in alqeada who participated in the 911 attacks http://rumcrook2.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this page contains links and commentary on saddams connection thru his security and intel agencies to al queda and specifically individuals in alqeada who participated in the 911 attacks <a href="http://rumcrook2.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://rumcrook2.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumcrook</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/#comment-23962</link>
		<dc:creator>rumcrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1171#comment-23962</guid>
		<description>saying iraq had &quot;absolutely nothing to do with 911 is flat out wrong.

saddam hosted al queda operatives in iraq. he promoted and allowed terrorist training camps to function in iraq. was he responsible for 911? in as far as he gave support to terrorist orgs and al queda, than yes and so you cannot say &quot;absolutely&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saying iraq had &#8220;absolutely nothing to do with 911 is flat out wrong.</p>
<p>saddam hosted al queda operatives in iraq. he promoted and allowed terrorist training camps to function in iraq. was he responsible for 911? in as far as he gave support to terrorist orgs and al queda, than yes and so you cannot say &#8220;absolutely&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cascajun</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/27/its-on-tv/#comment-23953</link>
		<dc:creator>Cascajun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1171#comment-23953</guid>
		<description>Regarding the use of Hama Rules:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hama_massacre&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;After the Massacre:&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;i&gt;&quot;Western countries denounced the attack as a breach of human rights and a massacre. In an official speech, Al-Assad called on the world not to harbour those who fled Syria. His calls fell on deaf ears. Most members of the Brotherhood fled mainly to Jordan, the U.S, England and Germany. Large numbers of them settled in the latter two, which granted them political asylum.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Thus, it seems the use of Hama Rules has the risk of potentiating terror and spreading it around the world in much the same way &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.karlloren.com/biopsy/p35.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cutting into a cancer tumor can cause it to break up an seed itself into other organs.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the use of Hama Rules:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hama_massacre" rel="nofollow">After the Massacre:</a>  <i>&#8220;Western countries denounced the attack as a breach of human rights and a massacre. In an official speech, Al-Assad called on the world not to harbour those who fled Syria. His calls fell on deaf ears. Most members of the Brotherhood fled mainly to Jordan, the U.S, England and Germany. Large numbers of them settled in the latter two, which granted them political asylum.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Thus, it seems the use of Hama Rules has the risk of potentiating terror and spreading it around the world in much the same way <a href="http://www.karlloren.com/biopsy/p35.htm" rel="nofollow">cutting into a cancer tumor can cause it to break up an seed itself into other organs.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

