<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread: elections 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:11:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Know</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/#comment-22201</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=784#comment-22201</guid>
		<description>CNN was so liberally biased it was pathetic.  They had GOP officials on there, who were conceding for the party to the left-wing illuminati before the election was even over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN was so liberally biased it was pathetic.  They had GOP officials on there, who were conceding for the party to the left-wing illuminati before the election was even over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/#comment-20508</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=784#comment-20508</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Doug, your #84.  And thanks, Wretchard, for the space to vent.  If any practical movement springs up to counter what we&#039;re in for, I&#039;m fully on board but in the meantime, I can&#039;t pretend away the ominous portents.

Fletcher Christian, that&#039;s one of the most ominous for sure - the conflict of Islam and Constitutional guarantees of free speech/no established religion.  No doubt, Pres. Obama&#039;s sympathies will greatly enhance the Islamists aims, starting perhaps with banking:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.actforamerica.org/index.php/learn/email-archives/494-us-treasury-department-to-host-shariah-compliant-financing-forum&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Brigitte Gabriel: US Treas. Dept. to Host Shariah Compliant Financing Forum&quot;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Doug, your #84.  And thanks, Wretchard, for the space to vent.  If any practical movement springs up to counter what we&#8217;re in for, I&#8217;m fully on board but in the meantime, I can&#8217;t pretend away the ominous portents.</p>
<p>Fletcher Christian, that&#8217;s one of the most ominous for sure &#8211; the conflict of Islam and Constitutional guarantees of free speech/no established religion.  No doubt, Pres. Obama&#8217;s sympathies will greatly enhance the Islamists aims, starting perhaps with banking:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.actforamerica.org/index.php/learn/email-archives/494-us-treasury-department-to-host-shariah-compliant-financing-forum" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Brigitte Gabriel: US Treas. Dept. to Host Shariah Compliant Financing Forum&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fletcher Christian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/#comment-20487</link>
		<dc:creator>Fletcher Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=784#comment-20487</guid>
		<description>Doug, I don&#039;t know what fatal flaw you refer to; but there is a hole in its logic, caused by the Founders&#039; inability to see into the future (for which, of course, they can&#039;t be blamed).

The First Amendment says &quot;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&quot;

Sounds OK? Then what happens when one of the religions permitted to be freely exercised has as a central tenet the establishment of religion? And as another a ban on criticising its prophet?

Further; the Constitution has a clause (I forget which one) outlawing slavery. What is the practice of dhimmi except slavery? And thus an Islamic state in the USA would necessarily throw away another of the parts of the Constitution.

I am quite sure that many other countries have similar problems with their legal systems. It&#039;s about time that we acted to plug the holes; and the simple solution is to ban Moslems from public office, and preferably to expel them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, I don&#8217;t know what fatal flaw you refer to; but there is a hole in its logic, caused by the Founders&#8217; inability to see into the future (for which, of course, they can&#8217;t be blamed).</p>
<p>The First Amendment says &#8220;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds OK? Then what happens when one of the religions permitted to be freely exercised has as a central tenet the establishment of religion? And as another a ban on criticising its prophet?</p>
<p>Further; the Constitution has a clause (I forget which one) outlawing slavery. What is the practice of dhimmi except slavery? And thus an Islamic state in the USA would necessarily throw away another of the parts of the Constitution.</p>
<p>I am quite sure that many other countries have similar problems with their legal systems. It&#8217;s about time that we acted to plug the holes; and the simple solution is to ban Moslems from public office, and preferably to expel them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/#comment-20462</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=784#comment-20462</guid>
		<description>Michael,
At least you&#039;ll know your money is going to address that &quot;fatal flaw!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
At least you&#8217;ll know your money is going to address that &#8220;fatal flaw!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/#comment-20461</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=784#comment-20461</guid>
		<description>Karen, indeed you have no reason to apologize for being so realistic/pessimistic.

One need only think of the damage to come from the Supreme Court alone, after BHO&#039;s picks take their seats.

Remember that tired old Constitution contains a &quot;fatal flaw.&quot;

Nothing more needs to be said about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen, indeed you have no reason to apologize for being so realistic/pessimistic.</p>
<p>One need only think of the damage to come from the Supreme Court alone, after BHO&#8217;s picks take their seats.</p>
<p>Remember that tired old Constitution contains a &#8220;fatal flaw.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nothing more needs to be said about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hoskins</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/#comment-20460</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hoskins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=784#comment-20460</guid>
		<description>Fear.  

I turn 60 in 12 days.  At that time a portion of my retirement planning kicks in; I become eligible for the military medical care benefit (Earned benefit, not an entitlement, not a right) from 24 years active/reserve duty.  Since my current income is large enough to qualify for redistribution, will I be able to maintain my savings rate for the 4 or 5 years needed to insure I do not become part of the problem?

Fear, with no adrenalin to help...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fear.  </p>
<p>I turn 60 in 12 days.  At that time a portion of my retirement planning kicks in; I become eligible for the military medical care benefit (Earned benefit, not an entitlement, not a right) from 24 years active/reserve duty.  Since my current income is large enough to qualify for redistribution, will I be able to maintain my savings rate for the 4 or 5 years needed to insure I do not become part of the problem?</p>
<p>Fear, with no adrenalin to help&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/#comment-20459</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=784#comment-20459</guid>
		<description>As I was editing the post below by a conservative teacher in California, I realized that my wife and I were 2 more conservative teachers in a one-party state for the 15 years we homeschooled our son in Hawaii.

When we went to public schools in CA, they were near the top in the country. Since then, with the advent first of the NEA, and next one party rule, and unchecked illegal immigration, CA schools now rank at the bottom of the country.

The same thing has happened in Hawaii, although only recently have we witnessed the influx of significant numbers of illegals, so Hawaii&#039;s public schools have yet to reach the depths attained in CA, but the trend has been steadily down since the advent of the NEA.

Obviously not co-incidence that these states&#039; unionized public schools have trended down together in one-party states.
-------------------------------

&lt;a href=&quot;http://rightontheleftcoast.blogspot.com/2008/11/agency-fee-rebate.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Agency Fee Rebate&lt;/a&gt;

Last week I received my agency fee rebate from the CTA. At the risk of repeating myself (I do have over 3500 posts on this blog so far!), several courts have held that I cannot be compelled to pay for a union&#039;s activities that do not relate to union organizing or employee pay, benefits, and working conditions. I pay full union dues each school year, and in about January of the following year an arbiter decides which union expenses are chargeable to me and which are outside of the allowable categories. My percentage of those disallowed charges is my agency fee rebate, and I receive that rebate check from the CTA each fall. Please click on the agency fee label for more details in general, and read this post for more specific information.

I received almost $400 last year; this year I received only $330. These rebate amounts are calculated but by an arbiter paid for by the CTA. CTA is required by law to pay for this, and it seems exceedingly unlikely that they would pay an organization that consistently ruled against their interests. I question the impartiality of the arbiters CTA hires.

The arbiter looks at the expenses for the NEA, the CTA, and the local union, and determines which are chargeable to agency fee payers and which are not. Here are the rebate percentages from last year:
NEA--48.59%
CTA and local--38.7%

Here are the percentages from this year, an election year:
NEA--53%
CTA and local--29.1%

The figures above are percentages that CTA&#039;s hired arbiter calculated are outside of the approved categories.

Given CTA&#039;s expenditures since the summer, I expect that next year&#039;s rebate percentage will be significantly higher in the CTA/local category. Given that I have no reason to trust the American Arbitration Association in this arena, though, there&#039;s no telling.

As I said, I received $330 back. I&#039;m going to spend over half of that by rejoining the &lt;a href=&quot;http://aaeteachers.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Association of American Educators&lt;/a&gt;, through which I receive better liability insurance than I would through CTA. I learned about AAE from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://ctenhome.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;California Teachers Empowerment Network&lt;/a&gt;, a grassroots organization of teachers who serve to counter and balance the one-sided information teachers get (often from the state union that&#039;s supposed to look out for their interests).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I was editing the post below by a conservative teacher in California, I realized that my wife and I were 2 more conservative teachers in a one-party state for the 15 years we homeschooled our son in Hawaii.</p>
<p>When we went to public schools in CA, they were near the top in the country. Since then, with the advent first of the NEA, and next one party rule, and unchecked illegal immigration, CA schools now rank at the bottom of the country.</p>
<p>The same thing has happened in Hawaii, although only recently have we witnessed the influx of significant numbers of illegals, so Hawaii&#8217;s public schools have yet to reach the depths attained in CA, but the trend has been steadily down since the advent of the NEA.</p>
<p>Obviously not co-incidence that these states&#8217; unionized public schools have trended down together in one-party states.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p><a href="http://rightontheleftcoast.blogspot.com/2008/11/agency-fee-rebate.html" rel="nofollow">Agency Fee Rebate</a></p>
<p>Last week I received my agency fee rebate from the CTA. At the risk of repeating myself (I do have over 3500 posts on this blog so far!), several courts have held that I cannot be compelled to pay for a union&#8217;s activities that do not relate to union organizing or employee pay, benefits, and working conditions. I pay full union dues each school year, and in about January of the following year an arbiter decides which union expenses are chargeable to me and which are outside of the allowable categories. My percentage of those disallowed charges is my agency fee rebate, and I receive that rebate check from the CTA each fall. Please click on the agency fee label for more details in general, and read this post for more specific information.</p>
<p>I received almost $400 last year; this year I received only $330. These rebate amounts are calculated but by an arbiter paid for by the CTA. CTA is required by law to pay for this, and it seems exceedingly unlikely that they would pay an organization that consistently ruled against their interests. I question the impartiality of the arbiters CTA hires.</p>
<p>The arbiter looks at the expenses for the NEA, the CTA, and the local union, and determines which are chargeable to agency fee payers and which are not. Here are the rebate percentages from last year:<br />
NEA&#8211;48.59%<br />
CTA and local&#8211;38.7%</p>
<p>Here are the percentages from this year, an election year:<br />
NEA&#8211;53%<br />
CTA and local&#8211;29.1%</p>
<p>The figures above are percentages that CTA&#8217;s hired arbiter calculated are outside of the approved categories.</p>
<p>Given CTA&#8217;s expenditures since the summer, I expect that next year&#8217;s rebate percentage will be significantly higher in the CTA/local category. Given that I have no reason to trust the American Arbitration Association in this arena, though, there&#8217;s no telling.</p>
<p>As I said, I received $330 back. I&#8217;m going to spend over half of that by rejoining the <a href="http://aaeteachers.org/" rel="nofollow">Association of American Educators</a>, through which I receive better liability insurance than I would through CTA. I learned about AAE from the <a href="http://ctenhome.org/" rel="nofollow">California Teachers Empowerment Network</a>, a grassroots organization of teachers who serve to counter and balance the one-sided information teachers get (often from the state union that&#8217;s supposed to look out for their interests).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/#comment-20458</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=784#comment-20458</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Our nation is about to become less exceptional...&lt;/i&gt;  I agree.  No more of this &quot;the world&#039;s last best hope&quot; stuff.  Too many Americans wanted change and change is what we&#039;re going to get.  It&#039;s all over but the crying, and there&#039;ll be plenty of that over all the &quot;changes&quot; that will be forced on us.  The only question remaining now is if the change will be a slow years-long process or a quick death spiral.  I started to say sorry but, no, I&#039;m not even going to apologize for being so pessimistic.  We know who Obama and the Dems are and we know exactly what we can expect from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Our nation is about to become less exceptional&#8230;</i>  I agree.  No more of this &#8220;the world&#8217;s last best hope&#8221; stuff.  Too many Americans wanted change and change is what we&#8217;re going to get.  It&#8217;s all over but the crying, and there&#8217;ll be plenty of that over all the &#8220;changes&#8221; that will be forced on us.  The only question remaining now is if the change will be a slow years-long process or a quick death spiral.  I started to say sorry but, no, I&#8217;m not even going to apologize for being so pessimistic.  We know who Obama and the Dems are and we know exactly what we can expect from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fletcher Christian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/#comment-20452</link>
		<dc:creator>Fletcher Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=784#comment-20452</guid>
		<description>Well, it looks as if my tired little country the UK is going to have to once again take up the burden of leadership against the forces of darkness. &quot;One Stone to rule them all, one Stone to find them, one Stone to bring them all and in the darkness bind them; in the Dar-al-Islam where the Shadows lie&quot;. A black stone, of course.

I hope we can. Maybe the enemy ought to be reminded, somehow, that we can bring about the predictions of the Three Conjectures all by ourselves. And maybe, just maybe, we will be lucky enough to find another Thatcher or Churchill. We don&#039;t deserve it, and neither does the USA.

Interesting times are coming. Pity we&#039;re not Chinese.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks as if my tired little country the UK is going to have to once again take up the burden of leadership against the forces of darkness. &#8220;One Stone to rule them all, one Stone to find them, one Stone to bring them all and in the darkness bind them; in the Dar-al-Islam where the Shadows lie&#8221;. A black stone, of course.</p>
<p>I hope we can. Maybe the enemy ought to be reminded, somehow, that we can bring about the predictions of the Three Conjectures all by ourselves. And maybe, just maybe, we will be lucky enough to find another Thatcher or Churchill. We don&#8217;t deserve it, and neither does the USA.</p>
<p>Interesting times are coming. Pity we&#8217;re not Chinese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aconservativeteacher</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/04/open-thread-elections-2008/#comment-20442</link>
		<dc:creator>aconservativeteacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=784#comment-20442</guid>
		<description>Elroy- it isn&#039;t a surprise that people in a tanking Democrat state voted for all Democrats.  I teach Advanced Placement Comparative Government, and this has let me learn about other country&#039;s governments.  Dictatorships are common- democracies are rare.  One-state rule is common- multiparty rule is not.  Our nation is about to become less exceptional, and if you don&#039;t like it, they&#039;ll eliminate you- first by cutting off your speech, later in other ways.  Power is the ultimate goal.  In Michigan, the &#039;reason why things are bad&#039; is because of &#039;one chamber is still controlled by the GOP&#039;.  It&#039;s about to be &#039;the reason why things are bad nationally is that the GOP keeps filibustering...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elroy- it isn&#8217;t a surprise that people in a tanking Democrat state voted for all Democrats.  I teach Advanced Placement Comparative Government, and this has let me learn about other country&#8217;s governments.  Dictatorships are common- democracies are rare.  One-state rule is common- multiparty rule is not.  Our nation is about to become less exceptional, and if you don&#8217;t like it, they&#8217;ll eliminate you- first by cutting off your speech, later in other ways.  Power is the ultimate goal.  In Michigan, the &#8216;reason why things are bad&#8217; is because of &#8216;one chamber is still controlled by the GOP&#8217;.  It&#8217;s about to be &#8216;the reason why things are bad nationally is that the GOP keeps filibustering&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

