Comments on: Al-Qaeda Threatens France Over Burqa

By: Gabriel Angel

Gabriel Angel — Wed, 19 May 2010 11:58:37 +0000

Dear professor Guvinoff, Iam a christian maronite from the Lebanon. For 25 years I visited regularly arab countries stretching between Lybia and Persia and learned a quitgood bit of their way of living. In Lebanon, till dato, no educates moslem women or girl use these hedous closing which they consider as medieval unnecessary atrocities for the respects of the feminin gender, the same was among schi’ites women that invited me and all of them offered us coffee or tea or sweets as it is commen in these countries. Even in Iraq Idid not notice about these egsagerationed fanatism. Today, Egypt is a symbol of extrem islamic religious fanatism, but 25 years back, a freind of a freind urged me to leave the Hilton hotel where I was alloging and invited me in his home not far from the H. hotel with these words: shame on you, you have a home in Cairo and you go to the hotel. We used to sit on the same table and have super with all the ladies of his families including his mother his wife, even his sister in law with her daughter, eat and lough. This sudden fanatism exploded after he stupid war of the Gulf which destroyed all the good relations betwen the christian Occident and the islamic Orient. Now to talk a bit about these lugubrus clothing, if called burqa, or niqab, or hijab, or tshador. No where, either in the two million hadith of Muhammad, nor anywhere in the commentaries of one of the four juridical schools of the sunnite islam, and not even a point or a virgula of all these crazy clothing, which the islamic schorals call religious convictions, are mentionedin one of the 6.600verses of the Koran. Who invented them, only the belved Allah can tell it. If really these 6 different types of clothing were religious convictions, then why the burqua is only used in Afganistan, and not even in the neighbouring Pakistan, or the tschadoronly in Iran, or the niquab or the integral veil only in Saudi Arabia and not in the close Emirates. If these decency clothing wee as the moslems claim religious convitions, then Muhammad had generalises one overall clothing. Then would you believe that Muhammad forced his young adolescent wifes,all beneath the 15 th of age to wear these clothing with 60° C. in the shadow, as it is known from several surates of the Qur’an that tell us about the regular contests among the harem of Muhammad, girls under 15th of age. Reviewing all, is in this comment an impossible thing so bye bye.

By: Greenconsciousness

Greenconsciousness — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:10:40 +0000

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1197478/Sharia-law-UK–How-Islam-dispensing-justice-side-British-courts.html

Next Sharia courts because “it is their free choice”. Free choice is the biggest hypocrisy of liberals anywhere and it is a reflection of how much woman hatred is internalized.

By: Bandy Burkah

Bandy Burkah — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:55:30 +0000

The sickest thing Obama has done so far is to defend a women’s “right” to cover their faces in America. I regard this as betrayal of women and proof of his dithering about Islam. He might as well sanction polygamy, honor killings and stoning adulterers.

By: Persevere » Blog Archive » Al-Qaeda Threatens France Over Burqa

Persevere » Blog Archive » Al-Qaeda Threatens France Over Burqa — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:06:47 +0000

[...] The burqa, niqab — even hijab — are being used as pawns in the power struggle between jihadic Islam and the West. These dress codes are primarily political in nature. for more click here [...]

By: Marie Claude

Marie Claude — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:34:40 +0000

David H, not yet, but that Guaino’s car(Sarko’s guru) who was accompagning policemen in their guard tour, was stonned the other night

now, policemen will get mini cameras when they go out in these quaters

http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2009/07/03/01016-20090703ARTFIG00333-la-police-de-seine-saint-denis-s-equipe-de-mini-cameras-.php

By: susan

susan — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:33:24 +0000

“and no, not all Italians are racist, but that peculiar one smells”

LOL, if you are looking for smell, try your own armpit. It’s well known fwench never appreciated the use of soap.

By: David H

David H — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:19:24 +0000

Marie Claude, did you read about that recent attack on two policemen going off duty in St Denis?

On a general note (not to Marie Claude), I find that comment Italians are racist frankly insulting, can you define racist, racist means looking down on someone because of the colour of their skin, or believing in differences between races, which is perfectly logical, after all the average Chinese have a higher IQ then the average European, oooops I am being racist.

Or do you perhaps mean Xenophobic, a irrational hatred of the other due to their different customs that they do not understand, but we have had Muslims living in Europe since the 70′s in large numbers, we have Islam rammed down our throats all the time, I think we understand Islam now, so I would suggest that does not work either.

Next up you will use Islamophobic, but people like me would think it entirely rational to be concerned about Islam, it is not an irrational phobia, after all those guests in a luxary hotel in India were most probably Islamophobic just before they were shot by your definitions…

Perhaps Italians discriminate, its like drinking an excellent Chianti as compared to a terrible one. And if they discriminate what are the parameters used for that discrimination, do they see cultural diversity as adding to their society or destroying the very fabric of their society.

Racist, xenophobic and Islamophonic, definitions used by imbeciles when they are unable to make rational arguments…

By: Poll: Should The Burka Be Banned In The U.S.? « Ironic Surrealism v3.0 -Mirror

Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:11:39 +0000

[...] must not dictate an Islamic dress code…(that) the European Union is a union of freedom.” As my readers know, yesterday, al-Qaeda threatened France because President Sarkozy had called for a ban on the [...]

By: Ironic Surrealism v3.0 » Should The Burka Be Banned In The U.S.?

Ironic Surrealism v3.0 » Should The Burka Be Banned In The U.S.? — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:34:01 +0000

By: Dr S McCosker

Dr S McCosker — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:16:37 +0000

Scott: I have had four children and breastfed them all, not fully weaning each child until it was about two and a half (since breastmilk is a great prophylactic against the nasty dehydrating diarrhoea and tummy bugs that kids that age are prone to).

I have breastfed my babies, discreetly, on buses, on trains, on aeroplanes, in church (in a back pew); in a small church I belonged to, I once turned up for communion with my happily-suckling newborn tucked under my shawl; and nobody turned a hair. When I had visitors at home – friends and family – if my baby needed to be fed, did I excuse myself and hide in the bedroom? Nope: I fed my baby and continued the conversation.

If I was at the beach – did I run off to find somewhere to hide? Nope: I fed my baby, right where I was. And my husband basked in the reflected glory of having 1. a wife he deems pretty 2. a wife of proven fecundity 3. a wife who can nourish the baby just as the good Lord intended.

But then I live in Australia, where breastfeeding is encouraged, and women may be seen suckling their babies, quite unselfconsciously, in a corner in a cafe, or sitting on a bench in the middle of the mall when they’re halfway through a shopping trip.

When young babies get hungry, they yell. And yell, and yell, and yell; and they CAN’T wait.

On a crowded bus, which would you prefer? That the infant-in-arms in the next seat screams hungrily and miserably throughout the trip (or perhaps is fobbed off with a ‘modest’ bottle [which is a NUISANCE to prepare and has to be sterilised, kept cool or warmed, etc], or…is tucked in under mother’s shawl or coat, quietly and contentedly feeding?