Only good Islamofascist is a dead one!

I believe Hollywood and the media are actually intimidated and that is the reason for their silence and attempt to limit justifiable outrage by parsing words and ignoring the types of things Ms. Chesler points out. The failure to publish the Mohammed cartoons stands as a stark indictment of our newspapers.

I pray for your safety, Phyllis, and that of your family and pets.

True enough. But experience suggests that this majority will not stir until it is directly threatened. It took Pearl Harbor to bring us into a war we should have been engaged in three to five years earlier. Any Jew, Hindu or Sikh who looks to Christians or Christianity for salvation needs his head examined.

The wholesale slaughter of innocents during WWII drew only one feeble protest from the Vatican, Mit Brennender Sorge, a Papal encyclical mainly lamenting the euthanasia of Germans with debilities. Nazi priests leaked word of the encyclical’s preparation and the Gestapo responded instantly with arrests of priests on charges of pedophilia. The Vatican quietly shelved its encyclical and remained silent until the end of the war when, like Austria, it claimed innocent victimhood by Hitler. The Vatican concordat with Hitler as well as many unambiguous statements from individual bishops leaves no doubt that, in its heart, the Church supported Hitler’s authoritarian program.

The Lutherans were even more openly enthusiastic in their support of the Fuhrer. They launched an effort to de-Judaize Christianity—an enterprise roughly equivalent to removing Hydrogen from H2 O and imagining that the result will be wet and drinkable.

So don’t count on the “crusaders,” Miamaman. The Islamists program is two-fold: Terrorize and narcotize. The “crusaders” are in dreamland and, odds are, they won’t wake up until it’s too late.

How bitter is the betrayal of Europe and the UK of women and non-Muslims!

In Britain, Muslims and Islam are Elevated above All Other People and Religions. Is there Anyone in the UK Government Who PROTECTS the Human Rights of NON-MUSLIMS?

Polygamy is against the law in Britain and punished by up to seven years in jail. The law is applied to everyone except Muslims. Provided Muslims marry multiple wives overseas, Muslims are richly rewarded and given welfare benefits for their multiple wives. Some Muslim men maintain two separate homes, driving between each home.

The UK and other European governments have set up supremacist Islamic sharia law courts revealing Western leaders’ utter contempt for the Western justice system of equal rights. Under Islamic law, women are inferior and defenseless non-Muslims have no human rights. Unless a drastic change occurs, due to extremely high Muslim immigration and very high birth-rate, Muslims will become the majority and cruel Islamic sharia law will replace Britain and Europe’s justice system.

MUSLIM Demographics (very alarming)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

The END of EUROPE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfOmQ4Eo_as

A couple of comments on your post:

1) “If Islam is so offensive to so many, why are protests against it so muted?”
I would not call the protest as “muted”. On the contrary, that so many diverse individuals get together to protest a common threat; namely, radical Islam and Sharia Law, tells me of a great desire to be more vocal, and, better, to continue. There is surely a growing need for networking among the different organizations, websites, and groups in the US that consistently unmask radical Islam, Jihad, Sharia Law, and Islamic Gender Apartheid. And there are many, and growing.

2) “Conventional wisdom has it that the American public is fat, comfortable and complacent and not easily aroused. That the danger is perceived to be distant and isn’t viscerally threatening. That we Americans are naturally pluralistic and reflexively averse to prejudice against those whose ways differ from our own, especially in matters of religion.”
This is true, and I think you are correct; however, America is not nearly as monolithic as it was when Pearl Harbor, things are much more complicated and pluralistic nowadays. Difference sectors of society has attained power they never had before, plus there are even new sectors of society that were not existent in the US then. So, which group of Americans do we refer too? Obviously some Jews will be in the forefront of this fight, given the imminent threat to Israel, but there are other growing groups in the US that have taken abuse by radical Islam for centuries in their original homelands, such as the Hindus (including the Sikhs), now Hindu-Americans, that can contribute much to the struggle. But, finally it is the engagement of that often-silent white christian majority that will decide the struggle. It was radical Islam as Al Qaeda who attacked us on 9/11, so it is incumbent to those who know, want, can, and have the call to, such as Robert Spencer and Geert Wilders, to enlighten the American public at large on the stealth Jihad taking place under the application of Al-Hijra, the Islamic doctrine of migration, this is what happened to Europe and where the US is going unless something is done soon. Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi said, “We have 50 million Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe – without swords, without guns, without conquest. The 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.” This is what’s coming to us unless we unite.

Conventional wisdom has it that the American public is fat, comfortable and complacent and not easily aroused. That the danger is perceived to be distant and isn’t viscerally threatening. That we Americans are naturally pluralistic and reflexively averse to prejudice against those whose ways differ from our own, especially in matters of religion.

I have a different theory. My theory is that the elites who dominate policy and public opinion in America view the American public with the same fear and contempt that males who dominate Muslim society view females.

The laughable Muslim male fantasy that excuses the enslavement of women is that women are wild beings–sexually insatiable, irrepressibly immoral and dissolute. If women were not held down continually, the entire male population would be devoured. Women are enslaved for their own good and that of Muslim society at large.

Until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, when America finally declared war on the Axis, anti Nazi and anti German sentiments in American media were as rare as anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment are today. Hollywood directors, including Hitchcock, were not allowed to make films directly insulting to Nazis. Hitlers atrocities were well known in their full horrific detail for years but no newspaper carried the story. The execrable Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jewish publisher of the Times, knew the worst but determinedly kept mention of the wholesale slaughter of innocents in their millions out of the paper of record.

None of this occurred by accident. It was policy. And policy today is no different. The eunuchs in the State Department and their fellow travelers and camp followers in the CIA and the media are determined to keep the American public ignorant and quiescent. They know best how to deal with the Islamic challenge and they make damn sure they have no interference from an aroused and dangerous American citizenry.

I have a suggestion, Dr. Chesler: Get radical. Peaceful demonstrations only play into the enemy’s hands. If the press doesn’t attend, the effort is wasted and the demonstrators are talking to no one but themselves.

Next time you call a demonstration, make it in front of the Saudi embassy not in Times Square. Bring plenty of ribs, ham bones and pork sausages to leave behind. In your signs and placards, honestly and openly depict Mohamed, Muslims and Islam for the pigs and piggery they are.

Be unsophisticated, uncivil and crude. Arouse the faithful, challenge the enemy and wrest control of events from the arrogant and suicidal American elites.