Comments on: Exiling Islamic Terrorists, Leaving Islam Behind: Two Solutions and Counting.

By: john.y

john.y — Sat, 02 May 2009 16:46:48 +0000

Here’s an idea for the US: how about a constitutional amendment stating:
“Religious beliefs being a matter for individual conscience and not subject to coercion, the right to leave a religion is absolute and shall not be infringed. Any religious group that enacts threatened or actual sanctions against members if they express a wish to leave the group shall lose its constitutional First Amendment protections, and be considered not a religion, but a criminal organization.”
The great thing about this idea is that it would only affect Islam and a few extremist cults, like Scientology. Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism and Hinduism would be completely unaffected. To those who say “that’s unfair”, I would say, “No, it’s not. It only formalizes legally what has already been understood in America since the founding of the Republic, and Islam threatens to undermine.”
Another benefit is that the automatic re-designation as a criminal organization would allow legal prosecutions of Islamic organizations under the existing RICO statute. No more American Muslims funneling money to Hamas and Hezbollah.

By: deguello

deguello — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:25:04 +0000

Exile them to New york City,LA,Chicago,etc,they’re not really America,and if they misbehave,the only ones hurt are OVTARDS (Obama voting retards).

By: Al Rassooli (author of “Lifting the Veil: The True Faces of Muhammad and Islam”)

Al Rassooli (author of “Lifting the Veil: The True Faces of Muhammad and Islam”) — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:42:10 +0000

PS. Sorry but for some reason I missed off the link to that interesting video (showing a mother explaining why she longed to have her many children murder people and die in the processes).

Here it is;

http://www.liveleak.com/e/bc4_1234284944

Kind Regards,
Al Rassooli

By: Al Rassooli (author of “Lifting the Veil: The True Faces of Muhammad and Islam”)

Al Rassooli (author of “Lifting the Veil: The True Faces of Muhammad and Islam”) — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:38:14 +0000

I’m generally most impressed with Phyllis Chesler and always very much enjoy reading her articles. Once again she is making excellent sense and many excellent points here. There’s just one small but utterly crucial difference of opinion between us on this occasion, however; In her very last sentence she says “I challenge my religious Muslim readers to explain how they can remain Muslims in an era in which jihadists are defining what Islam is”. Perhaps it’ll come as a surprise to many who believe themselves to be Muslims as much as everyone else but Jihad and Islam are inseparable and indivisible! You cannot have one without the other! And by “jihad” I don’t mean some theoretical inner struggle or whatnot – I’m talking about an affront and attack (whether covertly through stealth or all-out violent assault) on all “non-believers” for all time until there are none left! This is a very serious problem and one that should never be ignored or overlooked. When it comes to Jihad there are essentially three sorts of Muslim; Those who actively and openly participate in full-on Jihad in all its forms. Those who pretend not to know anything about it, or pretend not to participate or support it or even selectively misquote the Quran in an attempt to pretend it is even forbidden by Islam (when the exact opposite is, and always has been true – it is required and mandated). There are many Arabic words and terms for this sort of lying and deception (Arabic is my native tongue so I should know). “al-Taqiyya” is a well know one. Those who genuinely are innocent and either know nothing about what’s going on and wouldn’t condone or support it if they did. I can assure you these people are not “true” Muslims and are not actively practicing the unchanging “faith” handed down to them over the centuries that is in reality a death-cult of extreme violence and hate. Incidentally if you’ve ever wondered why Muslim women don’t do all in their power to prevent their children from murdering people and dying in the process here’s an interesting movie clip that might enlighten you; they really believe that there is nothing worth living for and only in death (when they go to a fantasy brothel in the sky they call “Paradise”) will they start to enjoy themselves. There’s even something for the mothers – if you watch to the end of the clip you’ll be amazed to find they dream of presiding over their son’s “black-eyed” virgins whom the mothers can treat as servants or slaves! What extraordinarily deluded and twisted people!? Kind Regards, Al Rassooli (author of “Lifting the Veil: The True Faces of Muhammad and Islam”) http://www.amazon.com/dp/1434392023 ) [please see also the YouTube Channel http://www.youtube.com/user/AhmadsQuran3 ]

By: wondering

wondering — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:30:15 +0000

To 15 Cameron
Re your statement
“Why would numerous mosques be running “anti-terrorism” programs attempting to persuade “youths” not turning into terrorists if Islam had nothing to do with Jihadism? ”

Have you visited “numerous” mosques speaking and understanding the language spoken in mosques to Islamic adherents?

Have you veted the source/sources to verify such comment? The propensity for duel language – indeed opposite language – depending on who is being addressed is an essential factor when attributing what is said or not in mosques or Islamic interest topics.

See http://jihadwatch.org and familiarize yourself with the educational opportunities provided to Islamic adherents in regards to running “anti-terrorism” programs.”

By: blight

blight — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:08:20 +0000

BTW, how do you deport 3 million British Muslims?

You convince them to leave voluntarily by whatever means necessary.

By: Camaron

Camaron — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:02:22 +0000

I’m pessimistic too. It is hard to make a distinction between “radical Islam” and “Islam.” In effect, they are parts of the same monster – one breeds the other. Why would numerous mosques be running “anti-terrorism” programs attempting to persuade “youths” not turning into terrorists if Islam had nothing to do with Jihadism?

What is the answer for the Islamic tsunami? At the present no government has the guts to efficiently deal with the issue; one day we will have a bloody clash of civilizations, I’m afraid. According the
Interpol Secretary General’s report, we are not even trying. We lack both the will and means.

BTW, how do your deport 3 million British Muslims? How do you turn them into Brits? The clock is ticking …

By: Alfredo

Alfredo — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:49:06 +0000

We must confront this Islam scourge everywhere and every time. Gaubatz’s effort in investigating Islamic organizations in the US and providing troubling information, when it exists, to authorities is to be lauded and we should donate to his effort.

Confront it at work, in social gathering, with families and friends, as they are counting on people’s naivete to expand theirt hate and their Sharia law.

http://dgaubatz.blogspot.com/effort in

By: David W. Lincoln

David W. Lincoln — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:52:40 +0000

Exile, and if they come back, execution.

After all, it isn’t only about rights, it is
also about responsibility, and government has
an ancient responsibility to protect.

By: George Jochnowitz

George Jochnowitz — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:14:45 +0000

Larsen E. Whipsnade,

Political systems repond to needs and pressures. Politics makes strange bedfellows, as everyone knows. Religions are based on faith and are incorruptible. Hamas can’t be bribed with a state. It has to do what it believes is virtuous: to die in a jihad while killing Jews.

As my wife, Carol says, “A person who is up for sale need never be all bad.”