Comments on: Vindicated By Muslims Against Sharia Law.

By: Christopher

Christopher — Sun, 17 May 2009 04:58:06 +0000

Muslims Against Sharia is a fraud. Did the writer of this article do any research at all? Just because they translate their site into other languages and have some people from other countries sending them money that does not make them an international organization.

Show us some lectures that they have given.

By: LadyPredator

LadyPredator — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:23:13 +0000

I suggest that anyone who has been defamed by Mr. Warner call the state of Florida Mr. Warner’s license number is C 9900446 his agency WBI license is A 9500364

Complaints/Unlicensed Activity

The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Licensing, investigates complaints regarding the security industry, private investigative industry, and the recovery industry. If you have a complaint, contact the regional office in your area, or contact us by mail, phone, or email.

Bureau of Regulation and Enforcement
Post Office Box 6687
Tallahassee, Florida 32314-6687
(850) 245-5499
Lisa Trimble

By: LadyPredator

LadyPredator — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:15:35 +0000

Don’t believe anything Mr. Bill Warner or his cohort in fabrication, Mr. Jim Sutter posts about anyone. So far the only legitimate objection to MASh is the fact that doesn’t appear to be Muslims in the traditional sense. Also all the offensive foul language doesn’t help Khalim Massoud’s cause. However the “expose” that these two narcissists have come up is pure fiction

Mr. Sutter, the source for alleged criminal activity is himself a multiple felon (6th Circuit Court #1:94-cr-00010-SHB).Projection perhaps?

Mr. Sutter who claims that MASh is alleged evading taxes is a person who was caught cheating the IRS in three consecutive years (Cleveland Common Pleas Court #2003200305289086). Projecting again?

Mr. Sutter, who claims that MASh is perpetrating religious deception, is someone who has been masquerading as a Catholic priest and Baptist pastor for at least 17 years. More projection.

Sutter’s and Warner’s “claims” that the FBI is investigating Muslims against Sharia is based on the fact that they supposedly filled out a web form on the FBI’s page.

Warner’s source, Jim Sutter, is a two time felon who projects his criminal behavior on others. On September 17, 1990, Sutter pled guilty to making false accusations (on which another person was wrongfully arrested) and was sentenced to 60 days house detention and three years probation.

http://tinyurl.com/cnvctb
http://tinyurl.com/ddxuq4

Sutter’s past criminal history reveals that it is he who has committed the crimes of stalking, forgery, making false police reports, using interstate communications to make personal threats, (he uses his blog to defame persons who don’t conform to his “whims and wishes” also known as extortion) credit card theft, impersonating an Navy officer, and impersonating mental health professional. (See his separation from the Navy after eight months here http://tinyurl.com/c9vw7r)

Warner is not much of a PI if he uses the compulsive liar Jim Sutter for a source of information!!

See: phonyrev.com
exposingsutter.com

By: vivvy

vivvy — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:10:04 +0000

I completely agree with FFFFF. It is a misogyny that corrupts the whole family and forces women to be complicit (sometimes) with the murder of her child. The mother will have been degraded from birth, very often beaten and lived in fear of being labelled as ‘not devout’. As victims of masculine brutality and oppression, they side with their ‘masters’, to show how they disapprove of their daughter’s conduct (thus proving how pure they themselves are) and protect themselves from the beatings or death that would follow if they dared to protest. It has been shown many times that victims of brutality end up siding with their aggressors for self survival.
To reduce these facts to name calling about hating all men is infantile and simplistic.
Both men and women as individuals have their flaws and I have noticed as many men as women (outside the misogynistic mindset) abhor these ‘honour killings’. However, it is a patriarchal religion that dreams up these horrors to be inflicted on women and I did groan inwardly when even honour killings are twisted around so that even these are now the fault of women ( isn’t everything) and once again men are whiter than white and even in a patriarchal, woman hating society it’s the women’s fault that they are being murdered.

By: Muslims Against Sharia

Muslims Against Sharia — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:27:27 +0000

Two deranged individuals, Jim Sutter and Bill Warner, are joining forces to defame Muslims Against Sharia. Before you buy into their lies and distortions, please consider the sources: http://www.phonyrev.com/ & http://insanepi.blogspot.com/.

By: bill warner

bill warner — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:07:52 +0000

FBI INTERNET CRIME COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST KHALIM MASSOUD AND MUSLIMS AGAINST SHARIA

http://www.billwarnerpi.com/2009/03/fbi-internet-crime-complaint-filed.html

By: joeblough

joeblough — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:13:46 +0000

Phyllis congrats.

A bit of victory must taste nice. You deserve it, and much much more.

Hang in there.

And thanks.

By: mama palama

mama palama — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 02:34:50 +0000

What evil comes to bear
All who participate in it share
Ultimately the fragility of life
And as such unending strife
What endures is spilt
Unto a world civilization built!

One has to wonder the impact on Islamic women whose pleasure center and its impingement if not outright disconnection from the capacity to choose a man. This in fact is the intention of cliterectomy and worse in some Islamic States countries labiaectomy in which she serves as do beasts of burden the male population. May is be assumed as well impact the attitude towards her children? Is the body not responsive in all its capacity of pleasure and pain somehow connected to giving birth to a child and having passed through the corridor of pain once born love removes the memory of the pain endured?

Could the destruction of the pleasure center in such women, for arguments sake, as well enable the kind of distancing from love it takes to preserve a child from a culture, a religion (Islam) and society in which her children are to be sacrificed, whose lives are destroyed in order to destroy the lives of others? The impetus to violence? The impact of such violence in which the mother herself bring the daughter in her childhood – from about 3 to five years of age – to have such pain inflicted as cliterectomy while the mother holds her down? Surely – bringing to bear the consequence in which mothers overcome the innate instinct to preserve the child born from her womb?

By: marymcl

marymcl — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:39:31 +0000

@11 FFFFF

I understand Islam just fine, OK? Everyone is dogmeat and women and girls have it worst of all, and in that order. And as for your closing threat, or promise, or whatever it is:

~”Just one thing: if you try to portray me as an unserious person, please be aware of the fact that I won’t allow you spreading such kind of lies.”

Oh, please, what are you going to do, throw your keyboard at me? Snap out of it, OK? If I think your reasoning is superficial, I’ll say so, and I’ll say why. You’ll either get it or you won’t. You’re not in any position to disallow it, any more than I could (or would) stop you from saying what you think. If you’re too thin-skinned to argue, don’t post.

But you gave me a good laugh at the end of a long day

By: Gary Ogletree

Gary Ogletree — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:48:14 +0000

No to Sharia means no to Islam. Islam is a dying religion rooted in greed, hatred and delusion. I see little worth keeping from Islam besides the wonderful traditional architecture. How about goodbye and good riddance to the rest of it? Waiting to be indicted by the UN.