<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TOWARDS A UNIVERSAL DOCTRINE OF HUMAN RIGHTS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 20:06:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chesler Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/#comment-52314</link>
		<dc:creator>Chesler Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards-a-universal-doctrine-of-human-rights/#comment-52314</guid>
		<description>[...] Towards a Universal Doctrine of Human Rights October 9, 2007 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Towards a Universal Doctrine of Human Rights October 9, 2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercurior</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>mercurior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards-a-universal-doctrine-of-human-rights/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>who die more often in wars, in disaster areas, who die more of violence towards them.

MEN.  more men are killed due to violence, than women.  (i am not saying violence against women is right perish the thought but more men die each year than women due to violent acts).

yes have shelters for women but also have shelters for men, as they get abused just the same as women.

its all about equality, and it shouldnt be one sex gets more than another.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who die more often in wars, in disaster areas, who die more of violence towards them.</p>
<p>MEN.  more men are killed due to violence, than women.  (i am not saying violence against women is right perish the thought but more men die each year than women due to violent acts).</p>
<p>yes have shelters for women but also have shelters for men, as they get abused just the same as women.</p>
<p>its all about equality, and it shouldnt be one sex gets more than another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Ray</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards-a-universal-doctrine-of-human-rights/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>So why aren&#039;t we organized to force battered women&#039;s shelters to be built with the ten million the UN has in their Trust to end violence against women globally? (UNIFEM’S Trust Fund in Support of Actions to Eliminate Violence Against Women)  The UN is stealing that money just like they stoled the oil for food money. So why aren&#039;t we organized to force the State Dept&#039;s Office of International Women&#039;s Issues to build shelters and connect US women with women leaders who are organizing globally?

I agree with your comments about the left, but is anyone writing on this blog stupid enough to think that the answer is on the right?

Phyllis Shafely to the rescue?

We need a Global Feminists for Women&#039;s Rights Organization whose focus is to shape the foreign policy of the US to feminist ends.  This is a heroic endeavor and saying the same things over and over to each other over will not make it happen.  Whose purpose does talk without action serve?

It is tragic that those &quot;feminists&quot; who were organized, or rather who held the sheds of those institutions real feminists built in their greedy hands, did nothing to use the middle east war to help Muslim women.  They were too lost in supporting the boys on the left, shouting anti Bush slogans to recognize the opportunities to liberate women.  The few who did see the war as a strong hand lifting the rock of oppression ended up talking to ourselves in a shriller and shriller voice.

Now what?  More of the same?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why aren&#8217;t we organized to force battered women&#8217;s shelters to be built with the ten million the UN has in their Trust to end violence against women globally? (UNIFEM’S Trust Fund in Support of Actions to Eliminate Violence Against Women)  The UN is stealing that money just like they stoled the oil for food money. So why aren&#8217;t we organized to force the State Dept&#8217;s Office of International Women&#8217;s Issues to build shelters and connect US women with women leaders who are organizing globally?</p>
<p>I agree with your comments about the left, but is anyone writing on this blog stupid enough to think that the answer is on the right?</p>
<p>Phyllis Shafely to the rescue?</p>
<p>We need a Global Feminists for Women&#8217;s Rights Organization whose focus is to shape the foreign policy of the US to feminist ends.  This is a heroic endeavor and saying the same things over and over to each other over will not make it happen.  Whose purpose does talk without action serve?</p>
<p>It is tragic that those &#8220;feminists&#8221; who were organized, or rather who held the sheds of those institutions real feminists built in their greedy hands, did nothing to use the middle east war to help Muslim women.  They were too lost in supporting the boys on the left, shouting anti Bush slogans to recognize the opportunities to liberate women.  The few who did see the war as a strong hand lifting the rock of oppression ended up talking to ourselves in a shriller and shriller voice.</p>
<p>Now what?  More of the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classical Values</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Classical Values</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards-a-universal-doctrine-of-human-rights/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;new blog exposes hideous double standards&lt;/strong&gt;

Via Dr. Helen, I learned that Dr. Phyllis Chesler (author of The New Anti-Semitism -- a great book!) now has a Pajamas Media blog. There&#039;s already a lot of great stuff there, but I was drawn to a reference in...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>new blog exposes hideous double standards</strong></p>
<p>Via Dr. Helen, I learned that Dr. Phyllis Chesler (author of The New Anti-Semitism &#8212; a great book!) now has a Pajamas Media blog. There&#8217;s already a lot of great stuff there, but I was drawn to a reference in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sissy Willis</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Sissy Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards-a-universal-doctrine-of-human-rights/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Phyllis: I think you will get a kick out of &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sisu.typepad.com/sisu/saint_hillary/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Girls will be girls&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; an illustration by Anita Kunz, whose words betray a refexive multi-cultural relativist mentality:

“Based on their clothing, none of those women are physically free,&quot; Kunz told The Phoenix. “I’ve had lots of reaction that baffles me. I’ve been called anti-woman, a racist, anti-Semitic, anti-American, you name it!”

As I said in my own post on the subject -- &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sisu.typepad.com/sisu/saint_hillary/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;At the intersection of vanity and liberalism&lt;/a&gt;&quot; -- &quot;Like old age, moral relativism is not for the faint of heart.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phyllis: I think you will get a kick out of &#8220;<a href="http://sisu.typepad.com/sisu/saint_hillary/index.html" rel="nofollow">Girls will be girls</a>,&#8221; an illustration by Anita Kunz, whose words betray a refexive multi-cultural relativist mentality:</p>
<p>“Based on their clothing, none of those women are physically free,&#8221; Kunz told The Phoenix. “I’ve had lots of reaction that baffles me. I’ve been called anti-woman, a racist, anti-Semitic, anti-American, you name it!”</p>
<p>As I said in my own post on the subject &#8212; &#8220;<a href="http://sisu.typepad.com/sisu/saint_hillary/index.html" rel="nofollow">At the intersection of vanity and liberalism</a>&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;Like old age, moral relativism is not for the faint of heart.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercurior</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>mercurior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards-a-universal-doctrine-of-human-rights/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>the whole ide of female genital mutilation has had a lot of press, and that is how it should be.

yet millions of men suffer a similar form of genital mutilation, and nothing is said.  this is why these feminist (read anti male organisations), want this thing to happen, they dont want it to stop, once all women are treated the same as men, then there will be no need for them, and no organisation will voluntarily kill themselves once they have finished their job.

they revel and they will enjoy creating more problems for them to &quot;solve&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the whole ide of female genital mutilation has had a lot of press, and that is how it should be.</p>
<p>yet millions of men suffer a similar form of genital mutilation, and nothing is said.  this is why these feminist (read anti male organisations), want this thing to happen, they dont want it to stop, once all women are treated the same as men, then there will be no need for them, and no organisation will voluntarily kill themselves once they have finished their job.</p>
<p>they revel and they will enjoy creating more problems for them to &#8220;solve&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njcommuter</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>njcommuter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards-a-universal-doctrine-of-human-rights/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>And the moral bankruptcy of a movement that demands the silence.  This is rule by force and fear, not public debate using free speech of free people.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the moral bankruptcy of a movement that demands the silence.  This is rule by force and fear, not public debate using free speech of free people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SGT Ted</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>SGT Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards-a-universal-doctrine-of-human-rights/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Today, many western feminists and progressives are multi-cultural relativists, not universalists. This means that they are more concerned with being (falsely) condemned as “racists” or “colonialists” than they are concerned with opposing gross violations of women’s bodies and minds.&lt;/i&gt;

It also points to a moral bankruptcy that prefers to remain silent to avoid being called a name, rather than do the right thing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Today, many western feminists and progressives are multi-cultural relativists, not universalists. This means that they are more concerned with being (falsely) condemned as “racists” or “colonialists” than they are concerned with opposing gross violations of women’s bodies and minds.</i></p>
<p>It also points to a moral bankruptcy that prefers to remain silent to avoid being called a name, rather than do the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards-a-universal-doctrine-of-human-rights/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>&quot;This means that they are more concerned with being (falsely) condemned as “racists” or “colonialists”

This is why leftist and radical libertarian political candidates must be resoundingly defeated at the ballot box.  They can, at best, offer no more then a half-hearted response to the Islamic terrorists. The dark skinned thugs are presumed similar to dogs that have been mistreated.  Their rabid behavior is ultimately our fault.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This means that they are more concerned with being (falsely) condemned as “racists” or “colonialists”</p>
<p>This is why leftist and radical libertarian political candidates must be resoundingly defeated at the ballot box.  They can, at best, offer no more then a half-hearted response to the Islamic terrorists. The dark skinned thugs are presumed similar to dogs that have been mistreated.  Their rabid behavior is ultimately our fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards_a_universal_doctrine_o/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2007/10/09/towards-a-universal-doctrine-of-human-rights/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>An excellent article.  I&#039;ve asked the same question for years.  Why are the feminists so quiet when it comes to Muslim treatment of women?  There is no good answer, in fact there is no answer at all from them on the subject when pinned down for one.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent article.  I&#8217;ve asked the same question for years.  Why are the feminists so quiet when it comes to Muslim treatment of women?  There is no good answer, in fact there is no answer at all from them on the subject when pinned down for one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

