Get PJ Media on your Apple

Unexamined Premises

Why Does Anyone Run for Office?

July 18th, 2013 - 3:23 pm
Because shut up

Because shut up

It was probably inevitable. With even the Constitution itself under attack these days — sure, it’s been going on since President Wilson (see what happens when the GOP splits the vote?), but the creepy neo-Marxists are out and proud these days — it’s small wonder that the Left is open in its contempt for American institutions. We’re witnessing juvenile, Frankfurt School “critical theory” in action, the deranged brainchild of a bunch of folks with plenty of intellect and not an ounce of common sense, who never did understand how their theories contributed to the monstrous evil they eventually had to flee. Secure in their sinecures at Columbia University, they immediately began the process of undermining civilization all over again, with what unhappy Alinskyite results we see all around us.

But hey, scratch a bleeding heart and score a fascist. For the absolutist do-gooders of the world, partial but voluntary compliance is never enough; everyone and everything must bow to their Wille und Weltanschauung in the creation of an imaginary world that only a German could conceive and then pretend to love: what ought to be is what must be — by any means necessary. It is, as they say, a moral imperative, demanded by the fierce urgency of change and fundamental transformation.

Now, it must be noted that Barack Obama is something of an exception to the scrutiny rule. We still know next to nothing about whole swaths of his life, including the trip to Pakistan, the transfer from Occidental to Columbia, the “missing year” there, etc. The annointing media, of course, had no interest in telling us a thing about the man that wasn’t contained in his two books about himself. But whatever you think of the president, he perfectly exemplifies and embodies the modern Left’s drive to power; after hiding his light under a bushel during his years in the Illinois state legislature, “Senator Present” could barely contain his ambition once he arrived in Washington, and didn’t even bother to finish out his first term before seizing the reins of power in Washington. Energy in the executive, as Hamilton said, might be admirable, but naked ambition is not.

Because what are you going to do about it?

Because what are you going to do about it?

And so we move inexorably forward into statism, a nation not of laws but of regulators, men and women who order us around because they can. Long lost is the original meaning of the word “regulate,” as used in the Constitution. Then it meant to make regular, to smooth out, to remove obstacles to the free flow of goods and services — and by extension of ideas. Today, “to regulate” has taken on the force of coercion, government by edict and fiat — not just from some Caligula at the top, but by an Orwellian hell filled with busybody functionaries, people unemployable in the real world but by the grace of OSHA and the EPA and countless other agencies empowered with life and death decisions over the population they ostensibly “serve.”

And so black is white, up is down, in is out; in a perfect execution of “critical theory,” everything that was once good and honored and respected and true is now its exact opposite, and vice versa. Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven says Satan in Paradise Lost. He’d feel right at home in modern America, and he’d have plenty of followers, too. Maybe he already does.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
When the government was small and didn't really have that much power over people, those of a nature to want to dictate to other people and lord over them and get rich from corruption for that mater didn't have that much incentive to go into government - to small and unpowerful so not enough payoff - so you had a much better class of men going into government. Now with government so powerful and so controlling and so rich, low men find it very attractive, and the lower they are the more attractive they find it.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
The disproportionate prevalence of "activist"-types committed to government "service" vs. the level of commitment by those of a conservative bent has always been a frustration for me. But i guess Conservatism is kind of a "hands off" approach. Activism is only required if you disagree with the status quo (I.e., adherence to The Constitution). Judges, legislators and regulators who do not want to be bound by the Constitution must therefore invent stuff to get their way. Unilateral diktats get them there faster.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
Leftists have created hall monitor hell.

The officious intermeddling dweeb who can't fit in or make it in the world of full and fair competition has to game the system from the inside and rig the outcomes, restricting free movement ...forward, upward, onward...because otherwise these losers would do what losers do...lose.

The Hall Monitors grew up and became City Hall Monitors. Look at ANY game in which competition is stifled, meritocracy is destroyed, patronage and graft rule the day...and you will find a sniveling toady leftist surrounded by lesser sniveling toady leftists.

And, failure...bankruptcy...moral and fiscal...will be virulent and widespread. The Red Plague. It is a place where truth goes to die.

"Truthyness" is "good enough". Stale agenda media, stale academia and stale entertainment carry the stench of this sepsis of the soul.

Obama is not merely a carrier. He's Typhoid Barry.

But, Michael...they are not interested in regulating us. It's a much higher plane of intrusion. We are being dominated. Ruled. Bowed.

When it gets to this stage...the adequate responses become severely limited.

There are very few cures for Typhoid Barry and the aftermath of this administration. Certainly no quick ones. Like the worst diseases...once you get it...you've got it.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (15)
All Comments   (15)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Whenever this subject comes up, I am reminded of this passage from Trevanian's Shibumi (1979):

"... the American version of representative government assures that such qualities as intellect and ethics as might equip a man to lead a powerful nation responsibly are precisely the qualities that would prevent him from subjecting himself to the debasing performances of vote begging and delegate swapping. It is a truism of American politics that no man who can win elections deserves to."
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
Why? Money and power - period.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
Why does anyone run for office? Tongue in cheek?

The answer must be obvious to anyone who lives outside the ivory towers of academia, media and government.

Those disdained populations of rednecks, racist-sexist, guns and religion bigots as members of that vast right-wing conspiracy and astro-turf. of the spokespersons for these ivory tower "elite".

The "commoners" so despised except as milch cow and pork these in office so freely and unaccountably dispense to their pet individuals and groups. The quid pro quo immortality in their jobs. Once in never out.

A New Age hereditary nobility, aristocracy and royalty. Aren't those in office however minor treated by the commoners as if princes of the blood?

WHY does anyone run for office?

A few words tells why. If they get lucky and are elected:
1. gravy train. Isn't that what government job with perks and non-contributory pension, elected or not, is?
2. immortality of job tenure with all that entails. Once in never out unless something truly exceptional happens.
3. immunity in law while in office and of course
4. the ability to exempt from any costs or penalties for laws imposed on those hated/despised commoners., e.g ACA aka Obama/Hillarycare.

Why not despise them, the common people? THEY elect by commission and omission - are not forced - the scavengers of government to feed off them. Even after they KNOW they're being abused in being taken for a ride.

38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
With Obama, the USA has our own Nero.

Fiddle on Fool.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
It's actually Caligula in the three pictures above, but right idea.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
Well, let's see, the three oldest jobs in the world are priest, politician [chief], and prostitute. All about power, prestige, and money. In the case of all three, they tended to settle for two out of the three prime attributes: power/prestige/money.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
When the government was small and didn't really have that much power over people, those of a nature to want to dictate to other people and lord over them and get rich from corruption for that mater didn't have that much incentive to go into government - to small and unpowerful so not enough payoff - so you had a much better class of men going into government. Now with government so powerful and so controlling and so rich, low men find it very attractive, and the lower they are the more attractive they find it.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
The 17th Amendment seems to have been a vehicle through which "low men find it very attractive"; being elected by popular vote rather than the original way of being elected by a state's legislative body. I for one; would like to repeal that 17th vehicle; given that we now have evidence of its results.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
Agreed, jimmytbone. I've been saying for years that the 17th Amendment was a disaster. For decades now, we've seen the pathetic results of it.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
"see what happens when the GOP splits the vote?"

As if Teddy Roosevelt was anything but a Dino-Bush

McKinley is to Reagan as T. Roosevelt is to Bush

38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
The disproportionate prevalence of "activist"-types committed to government "service" vs. the level of commitment by those of a conservative bent has always been a frustration for me. But i guess Conservatism is kind of a "hands off" approach. Activism is only required if you disagree with the status quo (I.e., adherence to The Constitution). Judges, legislators and regulators who do not want to be bound by the Constitution must therefore invent stuff to get their way. Unilateral diktats get them there faster.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
Well said, sir. And the angst that I hear from fellow travelers on a daily basis confirms that what you said so eloquently, we all know and have known for some time. At least since Nov. 6, 2012, which was our last chance to save the nation. OK. Maybe the next to last, but I'm losing faith that the original estimate was not, in fact, correct.

I, for one, think that we are doomed. But I've always been known as an Up With People, Glee Club kinda guy.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
Heck, P Henry, the coup was in '08. Where were you? Sleeping?
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
Well the so called media certainly did not vett Obama, instead they promoted him as an almost God. The career politician has replaced the citizen politician, and career politicians do not follow the linitations the Constitution lays on them. "We the People" allowed this transformation of our government through apathy and down right laziness, and this played right into the hands of the ruling class. Good people do not want to run for office because of the stigma of corruption that politicians seem to attract. It's going to take some hard work to wrestle our country back from these self proclaimed Caesars.
38 weeks ago
38 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All