OK, let’s start, and I mean starting with STATING RECORDED FACTS vs. and made-up things:

“…Obama’s vision of “change”–which is based on class structure and top-down collective enterprises–was not only contemporary but exciting.”

This is categorically and FACTUALLY a false statement. You know it so well that Obama’s approach has always been from BOTTOM UP and not what you stated.

Wow, how can anyone be as dense as this poster. She thinks that collectivist thinking is “Bottom up”. But how can the bottom be brought up unless you attack a phony class structure and tear down the top through high taxes and restrictive regulations.

that’s why socialism always fails. It was originally put forth during the Industrial Revolution. 3 econonic ages ago, and wasn’t perfectly relevant then. Now more than 200 years later, its starting to openly fail, but the servants of Marxist thought only redouble their efforts to get the workers of the world to unite against imaginary oppression.

Obama might win. I’ve accepted that. My father is so anti-Bush he’d vote for a ham sandwich if it was the top of the (D) ticket, and I know a few others who are the same way. They won’t be casting votes for Obama, but against the GOP. However, I’m starting to believe that the (D) party can’t afford an Obama win. Unless his advisors once in office are a ton better than his campaign staff, he’ll do a wonderful job of sinking the economy in a hurry, and in doing so permanently tarnish the Hopey/Changey theme the D party is riding right now.