You and all your warmongering readers are completely out of your finds if you think attacking Iran is a reasonable solution to any threat, real or imaginary, posed by their nuclear program. The only reason Iran is involved in Iraq is because Bush decided to invade and destroy the status quo balance of power, which in case any forgets, benefited us. With this mess next door, how can anyone expect Iran to not be actively involved in working things to their advantage? They put up with a beligerent Iraq for decades, and now is their big chance to keep that from happening again (thanks to Bush, of course).
In any event, what gives the US the right to atack Iran over their nuclear program? We have tolerated plenty of nuclear regimes (most recently North Korea). What makes Iran and different? Recent analyses show they will need the power in the near future. Mutually assured destruction worked just fine with the USSR and China, and neither of them were exactly models of rational thinking.
ML:
I am against invading Iran, stop putting words in my mouth. And as for Iran being as rational as Russia/China, I must say I do not remember Stalin praying for the return of the “vanished” Karl Marx in order to bring about the end of the world…
