Get PJ Media on your Apple

Faster, Please!

The Secret Deals With Iran

May 14th, 2014 - 7:17 pm

ML: “Some of them are publicly known, like the priest and the Marine. Nothing secret there.”

JJA: “Except that the one thing we know for sure about Obama’s dealings with Tehran–his direct appeal to President Rouhani to release those hostages–is never mentioned in the analyses. And yet it’s obviously important, because when he finally got Rouhani on the phone in New York last fall, he raised the issue directly. You’d think that might have stimulated some questions from the press, but it didn’t.”

ML: “And why?”

JJA: “I’m not sure. But I do know some things that have not appeared in print.”

ML: “Such as?”

JJA: “Such as a number of CIA agents who are in Iranian prisons. One of them, an Iranian-American woman, was ransomed for a tidy sum several months ago, and is now back in the US.”

ML: “How did all that happen?”

JJA: “She flew to Tehran from Dubai, of all places. Not smart. The Iranians are all over Dubai, and they were waiting for her at the Tehran Airport.”

ML: “Not a great moment in the history of American espionage.”

JJA: “A scandal!”

ML: “So the administration wouldn’t want anyone to look too carefully into the hostage question, huh?”

At which point the damn ouija board started to generate static.

JJA: “And the poor bastard from FBI and CIA who was grabbed on Qarq Island…you wrote a few years back…dead…and what about Bill Clinton personally meeting with Iranian officials to talk about hostages?”

And he was gone. In case you’re wondering, the story about the lady agent was given to two of our most famous reporters, but they haven’t written a word about it. And the failed attempts at espionage aren’t the only reason Obama & Co. wouldn’t welcome such a story. It would remind people–those few with working memories of such things–about the terrible mess Ronald Reagan got into when he insisted on negotiating with the Iranians for the release of American hostages.

I don’t think that’s the sort of comparison this president seeks.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
Bedfellows for "the cause".

Revolutionaries bumping uglies and pretending to oppose each other while their Propagandists bury signs of the tryst.

The One World Socialists who want to punish the colonizers, looking for payback and willing to achieve it by any means necessary.

There is no law that will protect us because they are not restrained by any law. There is no threat of being found out because the media is a traitorous conspirator and the Republican Party is by and large hapless and feckless.

We keep trying to soft peddle the reality. Our government has been seized. It is a raging case of political flesh eating parasites. They hate Israel, they hate America, they hate the free market, they hate Judeo-Christian values, they hate US.

ALL their "confusing" moves become clear...if only...we wake up, wisen up, and grow up.

A war where only one side treats the other as the enemy has a 100% predictable outcome. We lose, every time,
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
One of the most helpful clues I have ever come across in trying to understand the post colonial mentality that is currently driving American foreign policy was an outburst during the Iraq war from George Galloway (The red mayor of London) who declared the islamists "the last best hope of the revolution". Our leaders look at Islamists and see heroic victims of colonialism, not totalitarian religious reactionaries. Even Hillary, who prior to her days at State didn't appear to be a post colonialist, expressed surprise at the behavior of her allies in Benghazi. But Obama has been absolutely consistent. He has never lifted a finger against the Iranian regime and he has constantly tried to make things as difficult as possible for Israel. I don't think Bibi is squirming - just sharpening his knives and pursuing new alliances. And as preposterous as it seems there really is an Iran, North Korea, Venezuelan axis out there. But it is the left that is deluded in this alliance as is born out by the experience of the left in Iran in 1970 which supported the islamists until the Islamists executed them.
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
There's something here that for some reason still seems not to be fully understood ("for some reason".... Heh, heh...):

1. Iran may hate everything the USA (and the west) stands for, but Iran is NOT the enemy of the Obama administration. Israel is the enemy (along with the GOP and a USA, which must be "fundamentally transformed").
2. Israel, too, must be fundamentally transformed (AKA "saved from itself"). Until it no longer exists (but then, that would be Israel's own fault).
3. The name of the game is, "Make Israel (and Bibi) Squirm". It's easy to play and anyone can (and does) join in.
4. Obama's (and the EU's) support for the Ayatollahs---as well as their support for Abbas (that great "man of peace")---is the essence of the "Make Israel (and Bibi) Squirm" game.
5. One of the more successful strategies used in playing the game is to honestly pretend that Abbas does not wish to destroy Israel---and to pay no heed (or even scoff or yawn) when the Iranians, Hezbullah and Hamas (and the PA) declare that their goal is Israel's destruction. In fact, one will get even more points if one claims on the one hand that Iran, Hezbullah and Hamas (and the PA) really don't wish to destroy Israel (despite their numerous claims that that is exactly what they wish and plan to do), and on the other declare complete understanding (and even sympathy) with Iran, Hezbullah and Hamas (and the PA) say that they wish to do so.
6. Needless to say, one of the essential rules of the game is that Israel must be regarded as the party responsible for there being no peace with the Palestinians (and for that matter, no peace in the Middle East---and, why not?, no peace in the world).
7. Yep, it's a great game and anyone can play. Just remember who the enemy is and who your allies are. (Iran an Obama/Kerry/Jarrett/EU ally? You bet.)

File under: Rules of the game.
(show less)
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (15)
All Comments   (15)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
"JJA: “But we know they did the same thing in Iraq! (He was getting worked up, and started coughing. Are there Camel cigarettes where he is?). They supported both Sunnis and Shi’ites, and both sides of some tribal conflicts as well. They desperately wanted civil war, figuring they would benefit from all the killing.""

Michael, I believe that you are AGAINST this, but I can say it honestly: "These filthy bloodthirsty evil regimes and their followers of the Islamic terrorists groups "al Qaeda, ISIL, Hizbullah and Hamas" and also the horrified communist regimes, without a nuclear strike on their heads to change their cities to ash, never can demolish, the mullahs regime and that evil satanic black dark filthy culture, never can be tear down without a shattering war. This is the Best Way To Deal With them. the war should take place EVERYWHERE!!!"
30 weeks ago
30 weeks ago Link To Comment
Those of us who remember the "Iranian Hostage Crisis" will never believe anything they say. Americans were treated brutally....Carter acted like a naïve fool and must people at my advanced age do all the remembering what being a relatively unarmed country is like. Prior to Pearl Harbor, American soldiers practiced with WOODEN GUNS....It took months and many deaths to bring Americans up to winning capacity. Many Americans went through Hell. I knew someone in the Bataan DEATH MARCH. DID YOU?
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
Ledeen, you said, "a number of CIA agents who are in Iranian prisons. One of them, an Iranian-American woman, was ransomed for a tidy sum several months ago, and is now back in the US.
...
In case you’re wondering, the story about the lady agent was given to two of our most famous reporters, but they haven’t written a word about it."
-->Wow! Wow! and Double-Wow! I am being serious. I find this absolutely sickening, if not almost "treasonous." What reporter would not want to write a story about a courageous CIA agent caught and them ransomed by Iran.

Now certainly if the CIA "forced" said reporters not to write anything, I suppose that's different. But I imagine that in this country they could have still at least written about the story in an obtuse way so as not to reveal anything of note (right?).

Please respond and indicate whether you feel this is correct. I assume from your pointing it out to begin with that you also feel some amount of disgust at the lack of reporting on Iran (in all its terrorism-directing glory) in general. I certainly share this feeling and I fully concur with you regarding the apparent attempt to hide any preliminary agreements by Obama W/R/T a deal with Iran.

In fact, Evelyn Gordon and Jonathan Tobin at Commentary have both made similar points in pieces yesterday (5/14) and today (5/15). Frankly, I'm damned worried at this point that Obama/Kerry are *indeed* about to close a "bad deal" as opposed to "no deal." That being in *direct contravention* to their promise repeated over and again and once again even yesterday by Susan Rice in Israel.

-- FF
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
I have always thought Obama has extreme prejudice toward Moslem countries and have never been convinced that he is not a Moslem himself. Just saying otherwise doesn't make it so. I don't care if his birth certificate says Hawaii or Kenya....it's his attitude that counts.
Time and again the man has told lies.....and eventually admitting that. We cannot pick and choose what to believe. GET REAL!
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
yes i am appalled at the lack of coverage of the current hostage situation. as we learned in Iran-Contra, negotiating hostage releases can overwhelm serious policy concerns. that may be happening again. it's a serious matter, but the bigtime reporters don't seem interested.
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
There is a large Lebanese Shiite colony in Sierra Leone. They buy cheap blood diamonds and launder the profits thru Hezbollah
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
Isn't the obvious explanation for the Obama fecklessness on Iran (and virtually every other part of their foreign "policy") the following:

Obama WANTS Iran to have a nuke, so as to simultaneously cut Israel down to size (it's pretty obvious he's always wanted that outcome) and simultaneously cause America to also lose influence in the Middle East (it's reality, whether or not he intended it so ... I just happen to believe that this is a feature, not a bug, of the Obama foreign policy).

I mean, Barack Obama is like history's most obvious America hater, despite having to make strained efforts to appear otherwise as our Commander in Chief ... which mindset he inherited from his flaky mother and learned from his real father, Frank Marshall Davis, who was a Communist spy based in Hawaii (the whole "Obama Senior" deal was just a cover story to benefit his grandfather, who was a CIA spook and couldn't afford to let it get out that his daughter was impregnated by one of his own professional targets). Conveniently, Davis stuck around to continue mentoring young Obama, even after he returned to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. That last part is in his book - I didn't make that up.

BO's only got two years and eight months left to do his life's work before the next President inherits the office and who, regardless of whoever it will be, won't be on Obama's anti-American wavelength.

Look for it to get much dicier before January 20, 2017.
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
bigtime
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
I would be very very happy to be proved wrong in this prediction ...
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
Bedfellows for "the cause".

Revolutionaries bumping uglies and pretending to oppose each other while their Propagandists bury signs of the tryst.

The One World Socialists who want to punish the colonizers, looking for payback and willing to achieve it by any means necessary.

There is no law that will protect us because they are not restrained by any law. There is no threat of being found out because the media is a traitorous conspirator and the Republican Party is by and large hapless and feckless.

We keep trying to soft peddle the reality. Our government has been seized. It is a raging case of political flesh eating parasites. They hate Israel, they hate America, they hate the free market, they hate Judeo-Christian values, they hate US.

ALL their "confusing" moves become clear...if only...we wake up, wisen up, and grow up.

A war where only one side treats the other as the enemy has a 100% predictable outcome. We lose, every time,
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
No mystery here. Terrorism works. The Department of State and the CIA have been thoroughly cowed by Iran.
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
There's something here that for some reason still seems not to be fully understood ("for some reason".... Heh, heh...):

1. Iran may hate everything the USA (and the west) stands for, but Iran is NOT the enemy of the Obama administration. Israel is the enemy (along with the GOP and a USA, which must be "fundamentally transformed").
2. Israel, too, must be fundamentally transformed (AKA "saved from itself"). Until it no longer exists (but then, that would be Israel's own fault).
3. The name of the game is, "Make Israel (and Bibi) Squirm". It's easy to play and anyone can (and does) join in.
4. Obama's (and the EU's) support for the Ayatollahs---as well as their support for Abbas (that great "man of peace")---is the essence of the "Make Israel (and Bibi) Squirm" game.
5. One of the more successful strategies used in playing the game is to honestly pretend that Abbas does not wish to destroy Israel---and to pay no heed (or even scoff or yawn) when the Iranians, Hezbullah and Hamas (and the PA) declare that their goal is Israel's destruction. In fact, one will get even more points if one claims on the one hand that Iran, Hezbullah and Hamas (and the PA) really don't wish to destroy Israel (despite their numerous claims that that is exactly what they wish and plan to do), and on the other declare complete understanding (and even sympathy) with Iran, Hezbullah and Hamas (and the PA) say that they wish to do so.
6. Needless to say, one of the essential rules of the game is that Israel must be regarded as the party responsible for there being no peace with the Palestinians (and for that matter, no peace in the Middle East---and, why not?, no peace in the world).
7. Yep, it's a great game and anyone can play. Just remember who the enemy is and who your allies are. (Iran an Obama/Kerry/Jarrett/EU ally? You bet.)

File under: Rules of the game.
(show less)
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
After reading Ledeen's earlier essay on how things are better than they appear because our enemies Venezuela, Russia, Iran et al are weaker was than they appear.

In particular the Iranian leadership look like nothing more than a bunch of great apes vying for social position and power so they can have the biggest harem and thus biggest brood. In the end these silverbacks or silver back wanna bes will kill each other. They cannot betray their DNA.

There is hope in Iran. Many are turning to Christianity. Maybe then we can "all try try to get along" instead playing at alpha male and leaving the biggest brood. Of course once Islam is played out, the Machiavellian among us will try to use the precepts of Christianity to their advantage like they have in the past and will again.

The worst of it is that the Left wants to use Islam against their enemies (as people have pointed out here). they are playing the same game as the Iranian silverbacks.
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
One of the most helpful clues I have ever come across in trying to understand the post colonial mentality that is currently driving American foreign policy was an outburst during the Iraq war from George Galloway (The red mayor of London) who declared the islamists "the last best hope of the revolution". Our leaders look at Islamists and see heroic victims of colonialism, not totalitarian religious reactionaries. Even Hillary, who prior to her days at State didn't appear to be a post colonialist, expressed surprise at the behavior of her allies in Benghazi. But Obama has been absolutely consistent. He has never lifted a finger against the Iranian regime and he has constantly tried to make things as difficult as possible for Israel. I don't think Bibi is squirming - just sharpening his knives and pursuing new alliances. And as preposterous as it seems there really is an Iran, North Korea, Venezuelan axis out there. But it is the left that is deluded in this alliance as is born out by the experience of the left in Iran in 1970 which supported the islamists until the Islamists executed them.
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
"The last best hope of The Revolution"

...finally, A LEFTIST BEING HONEST about their feelings towards Islamic Jihad.

Though I kind of think you're slightly off about the Left seeing them as "heroic". The Left knows quite well they're a fanatical army of barbaric killers.

They're just trying to figure out how they can bring that army here and set them loose on the Enemies of the Left.

Amnesty and Open Borders are the route the Left prefers.
31 weeks ago
31 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “The Secret Deals With Iran”