Get PJ Media on your Apple

Faster, Please!

Iran ‘Elections’: Lots of Circus, Not So Much Bread

May 16th, 2013 - 7:31 pm

Election Day:  In the center ring, this is the big show.  The leader wants to be able to tell the world that the regime has huge popular support, even though everybody knows it would be overwhelmingly voted out in any honest election, as it was in 2009.  So lots of citizens will be ordered to the voting booths, and lots of Basijis and Revolutionary Guards will be bussed all over the place–Potemkin-style–casting ballots early and often.  Some will get paid for their work, others will get fed.  Foreign journalists will be instructed to report a monster turnout and great popular enthusiasm.  The stories, save for the name of the new president, could be written today.

The Winner:  The “count” will be announced in the evening.  Usually there’s a clear winner (the “rules” provide for a runoff between the top two if nobody gets a majority), and it would be surprising if there were a second round, because that would provide a legitimate excuse for large numbers of people to assemble in the streets.  The regime does not want that.  They remember 2009.  Hundreds of thousands of citizens demanded that Mir Hossein Mousavi be certified as the winner.  Today he’s locked away under a form of house arrest/internal exile.

Don’t pay attention to the circus.  Keep your eye on the ball.  This is a hollow regime, it’s riven beyond description, and even its foreign legion, Hezbollah, is very unhappy about fighting and dying for Sunni Arabs in Syria.  Secretary Kerry, with his extraordinary ability to miss the main issues, actually went to the Senate and asked the world’s greatest deliberative body to hold off on tougher sanctions through the “election” period.  He’s got it backasswards.  After all, he’s now in charge of leading with our national behind.

 

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (5)
All Comments   (5)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
"The mid-June circus will play out in three rings. First, the selection of the candidates, then voting day, and finally the announcement of the winner. In each ring, you may be tempted to watch the acrobats (candidates), but the real action is in the dark rooms of the leader."

Ring a bell?
47 weeks ago
47 weeks ago Link To Comment
uh, no. Perhaps I'm hopelessly ignorant, but I truly have no idea about that which you're hinting.

Some Leftist criticism of the US perhaps? Maybe 150 years ago -- but frankly, even then (and for *every* election prior to that until Washington) -- while *candidates* may have been chosen in "back rooms," the president most certainly was not.

This fact demonstrates perhaps the singularly most remarkable aspect of the USA: government of the people, by the people, (and) for the people -- a revolutionary principle underlying a country if there ever was one!
47 weeks ago
47 weeks ago Link To Comment
The last half of the 20th century was about equally divided by our two political parties while the same can be said of the beginnings of the 21th century. The point being, that every presidents administration has followed the same 'plan' for Iran and share equally in all the failures over the many decades. Somebodys long term middle east plan has proven over and over and over, not very.............
47 weeks ago
47 weeks ago Link To Comment
Mr. Ledeen:

Interesting article, but I do have a few questions:

1. The regeime may not be popular, but why should that matter to it? As long as the Revolutionary Guards and the secret police are loyal, the regeime is invulnerable, is it not? And, it is my understanding that the regeime does enjoy the approval of the rural masses for whom it provides bread.

2. Panem et Circensses works today as well as it did in Roman times. As long as the government has oil, it will have money. As long as it has money, it will have bread. As long as it has bread, the people, army and secret police are loyal.

3. And more importantly, whatever economic problems Iran may have, their nuclear program is going full blast - and the Obama administration is doing nothing to stop them. Perhaps we should stop focussing on the Iranian people, who either support that program or can do nothing to stop it, and start looking at what happens when Iran ushers in the age of nuclear terrorism.
47 weeks ago
47 weeks ago Link To Comment
i've dealt with these good questions over many years, Battle, let me try to give you thumbnails:

1. The regime fears its people, it expects a big uprising and does everything possible to forestall it. If the West supported the people, the regime could well be overturned. Maybe even fast.

2. "Loyalty" is not word I'd use about Iranians, whether in the streets, the army or the security forces. Some fanatics are willing to die for Khamenei, but not many.

3. Yes the nuclear program proceeds apace (careful about "full blast," heh). I wouldn't say nothing is being done to stop it; they don't seem to have the bomb yet...the best way to act is to further regime change...as even the Washington Post has said...
47 weeks ago
47 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All