OOOPS! Another mullah confession
Remember Ahmadi-Nezhad’s boast at Columbia University that there were no gays in Iran? Well, it turns out that at a recent “peace” conference, Mohsen Yahyavi let it slip that, while there might be none, if the regime laid its hands on a homosexual, they killed him/her/it.
Homosexuals deserve to be executed or tortured and possibly both, an Iranian leader told British MPs during a private meeting at a peace conference, The Times has learnt.
Mohsen Yahyavi is the highest-ranked politician to admit that Iran believes in the death penalty for homosexuality after a spate of reports that gay youths were being hanged.
I don’t expect this story to make headlines, but hey, it’s in the London “Times” so you never know. Let’s hope. It is one of those dazzling statements that, so to speak, tears the veil away from the illusion the mullahs try to cultivate in Western circles.
Today it was officially said here that Albaradei will visit Iran most probably before his new report is issued.
I think Albaradei must be very angry with the US sanction on Iranian banks. All these years he could receive his bribe through the banking channels but this time he should come here to get the all-in-cash bonus in person.
I am sure his luggage on his return will be unbearably heavy and the poor guy will have a tough time to carry them.
How sad!
I’ll say this much – Mohsen Yahyavi and those he speaks for: they are stubborn cusses.
Either there are homosexuals, or there arn’t, in Iran.
So, Michael, do you think exile to Biarritz is in the cards for those running Iran into the ground? Because they will not countenance where we are coming from, lest they become those they demonize.
For, we would say, “either there are homosexuals in Iran, or there are none.”
Sadly the story will be ignored by the MSM because it doesn’t fit their narrative. According to the bastions of good journalistic taste, Bush is the real threat to gay people and he wants to make war on Islamic nations to steal their oil, defend Israel, ect.
To dwell on the barbaric behavior of Iran is considered very boorish and uncouth.
Mullahs and their evil people are not even good liars…
Since no one posted anything, may I use this opportunity to suggest a short but great moment of laugh.
It’s a bit about Amadi…something…jad at some point. So…
http://www.worldleaderreviews.com/reviews.php
ML:
many thanks. always up for a good chuckle.
This comes under the heading “I knew exactly what Ahmedenijihad meant”. No one else seemed to pick up on it but I understood. I don’t think he even knew how honest he was being when asked this question while at Columbia. He responded that we don’t have this phenomenon in Iran. He’s right. They don’t have this precisely because anyone even remotely engaging in the activity is put to death. Therefore if all known to practice the deemed offense are put away, the phenomenon doesn’t exist…………