Get PJ Media on your Apple

PJM Lifestyle

The Superior Virtue of the Oppressed

A review of Unhitched: The Trial of Christopher Hitchens by Richard Seymour.

by
Robert Wargas

Bio

March 3, 2013 - 7:00 am

And who better to conduct such violent proceedings than a Marxist-Leninist? Seymour is a British writer who runs a blog called “Lenin’s Tomb.” Please note that his username on the blog is indeed “lenin,” lowercase and everything, and that I cannot detect any hint of irony or shame in his use of the moniker. His other work includes a book titled The Liberal Defence of Murder, in which he investigates how Western liberal “imperialists” have justified military intervention in the dubious name of humanitarianism. (The inherent “imperialism” of “liberal capitalist” societies is a concept that, for Seymour, has achieved the same epistemic status as Mount Everest or the germ theory of disease.) You might feel uncomfortable reading moral judgments from someone who proudly bears the name of one of the great terrorist-murderers of the 20th century. Then again, Seymour isn’t himself a murderer; he just plays one on the Internet.

Unhitched is an attempt to demonstrate that its subject’s career was defined by a thoroughgoing intellectual shoddiness and “gratuitous self-display”: nostalgia for empire, racism, misogyny, etc. I can only say that this book is about as close to a waste of time as you can get, unless you’re being paid to review it. It tries very hard not to appear to be what it is: revenge against a deserter of the faith. As someone who turned away from “anti-imperialism” to defend the freedoms of the West (terms that are, in this book, permanently ensconced in scare quotes), Hitchens is the ultimate target for the hard left, confirming Alexander Cockburn’s observation that, for Marxists, the idea of political debate is to stand in a circle, point the guns inward, and pull the trigger.

Seymour alleges that Hitchens’s nastiness even took the form of piracy. He writes, for instance, that Hitchens’s book The Missionary Position, an indictment of Mother Teresa, was actually the work of an uncredited Indian author:

The manuscript was judged to need rewriting, and was purchased by Verso with the intention of offering the idea to an Anglophone author. Hitchens, with his acknowledged contempt for religion and propensity for refined iconoclasm, could hardly have been more well suited. What he produced was an intelligently written indictment, but the original hardback made no acknowledgment of the input of several colleagues.

This makes Verso, the publisher of the very book in which these words appear, complicit in what Seymour obviously regards as plagiarism. If they bought the manuscript, they knew to whom partial credit should be given, no? And yet no editor or executive chose to give it. Perhaps Seymour’s next book should be The Trial of Verso, published, of course, by Verso. The only source for the charge is an “interview” (more likely a barroom chat) with Tariq Ali, a figure who appears regularly in these pages to fire random shots at Hitchens’s character. It’s amusing but ultimately tiresome: Ali is an admitted defender of “the resistance” in Iraq, including those who “resist” by blowing up fellow resisters. Anything he says is tinged with the same moral cretinism of which Seymour accuses Hitchens.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (4)
All Comments   (4)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
We are all now psychologists interpreting personality, developmental history and outcome traits of people we neither know nor have ever seen in the flesh - statistics doncha know. based on the stories they tell.

It seems "appropriate" then to diagnose the psychology - perhaps better psycho-social - pathology of people like Richard Seymour and his fellows who call tlhemselves "liberals". Now outed as "progressives". in the service of government engineers with the wherewithal to put their programs into effect, e.g. in Great Britain James Callaghann with his "winter of discontent and in the USA All the Kennedys, both the Clintons and now of course the fina ising stamp in the hands of their BH Obama.

Their style in discourse that of ravening psychopath with delusions of grandeur over people i.e. the poor and disadvantaged professedly championed but used primarily as tools/instruments for their New pyramidal constructions.

With aims for absolutef life and death powers over people as Pharoahs, kings, emperors (with or without new clothes) and Tsars.

Using contrived famine starvation of masses IN CASE of resistance to their "Dreams", show trials and summary execution, under guise of lawful behaviour, of public oppoinents, Lyubienko and gulag to enforce continued obedience.

"Re-training" of the population with extensive rewards for any who "bring glory" to their designs in, being no fools, complete obedience to their powers.

Their spokespersons in their public "information" and entertainment media bang their drums and blow theri trumpet. How could they possible lose?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
The book sounds like an excellent teaching tool, a textbook illustration of circular reasoning and bad faith.
I like this line in the review best, "You needn’t consider reality since reality is specifically the thing against which you’re arguing." Sums up the ideological psychosis of the Left very well.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
First (and last) impression.

The author of this book can't hold a candle to the wit and intellect of Christopher Hitchens.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
This book sounds like the sort of non-fiction with which I have no patience whatsoever. When the English language, in its simpler form, is inadequate to express the elegance of your thoughts (typically because you're doing something like excusing mass murder) it usually helps to concoct some silly jargon or impressive turn of phrase, which makes you sound intelligent and sophisticated. Those lower classes who don't comprehend your brilliant rhetoric are hopefully intimidated by how complex your thought processes are (conservatives evil; liberals sort of evil; communist dictators good!) and so will be restrained from questioning your brilliant opinions, so that the mass murderers can continue their good work...or something. It's the sort of thing that would get laughed out of any intelligent conversation, but gets you tenure at many universities and even apparently gets your books published. Hopefully few people buy this drivel; he's probably gotten enough attention as it is.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All